From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-446992-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 24821 invoked by alias); 20 Mar 2014 14:34:48 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 24775 invoked by uid 48); 20 Mar 2014 14:34:43 -0000
From: "dominiq at lps dot ens.fr" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/60563] FAIL: g++.dg/ext/sync-4.C on *-apple-darwin*
Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2014 14:34:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.9.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-60563-4-75OYIkn94w@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-60563-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-60563-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2014-03/txt/msg01861.txt.bz2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60563

--- Comment #8 from Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> ---
> Well - when I build the test -O0,O1,Os it passes. 

Confirmed when running the test suite. However the following reduced test

/* { dg-do run { target hppa*-*-hpux* *-*-linux* *-*-gnu* powerpc*-*-darwin*
*-*-darwin[912]* } } */
/* { dg-require-effective-target sync_long_long_runtime } */
/* { dg-options "-fexceptions -fnon-call-exceptions -O2" } */

/* Verify that the builtin functions are correctly marked as trapping
   when using -fnon-call-exceptions.  */

#include <stdlib.h>
#include <signal.h>

typedef int ditype __attribute__ ((mode (DI)));

#define FN(IDX, RET, CALL)                    \
static RET f ## IDX (void *p) __attribute__ ((noinline));    \
static RET                            \
f ## IDX (void *p)                        \
{                                \
  return CALL;                            \
}                                \
static void                            \
t ## IDX ()                            \
{                                \
  try                                \
    {                                \
      f ## IDX(0);                        \
    }                                \
  catch (...)                            \
    {                                \
      return;                            \
    }                                \
  abort();                            \
}

FN(18, void, (__atomic_clear((ditype*)p, __ATOMIC_SEQ_CST)))

static void
handler(int)
{
  sigset_t clear;

  sigfillset (&clear);
  sigprocmask (SIG_UNBLOCK, &clear, NULL);
  throw 0;
}

int
main ()
{
  signal (SIGSEGV, handler);
  signal (SIGBUS, handler);

  t18();

  exit(0);
}

fails with -O1, but not with -O0 (-m32 and -m64).