From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26791 invoked by alias); 19 Mar 2014 22:02:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 26755 invoked by uid 48); 19 Mar 2014 22:02:44 -0000 From: "daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/60595] Compiler error when computing default destructor thunk within virtual inheritance hierarchy Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2014 22:02:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.8.2 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2014-03/txt/msg01812.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D60595 Daniel Kr=C3=BCgler changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |daniel.kruegler@googlemail. | |com --- Comment #1 from Daniel Kr=C3=BCgler --- Seems to be fixed for the current 4.9 trunk >>From gcc-bugs-return-446944-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Mar 19 22:14:18 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 2224 invoked by alias); 19 Mar 2014 22:14:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 2185 invoked by uid 48); 19 Mar 2014 22:14:14 -0000 From: "burnus at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug other/60589] Parallel install fails due to multiple cilk.h installs Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2014 22:14:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: other X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.9.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: build X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: burnus at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status cf_reconfirmed_on short_desc everconfirmed Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2014-03/txt/msg01813.txt.bz2 Content-length: 1448 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60589 Tobias Burnus changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed| |2014-03-19 Summary|Parallel install fails |Parallel install fails due | |to multiple cilk.h installs Ever confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus --- (In reply to Yury Gribov from comment #0) > It looks like libcilkrts Makefile tries to install cilk.h twice in parallel > (in install-nodist_cilkinclude_HEADERS and install-cilkincludeHEADERS) and > runs into a conflict. > The error was probably introduced in r208440. Hmm, I wonder why I did not see it when I tried it. I once did a find to see whether "cilk.h" was installed - but the find turned up blank. I now do see several cilk/ include files - including cilk.h. :-( Probably the right choice is to simply revert r208440. > BTW could someone add libcilkrts to list of components? What do you mean by this? I have a pending - and hopefully more sensible - patch at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-03/msg00492.html where -fcilkplus implies -lcilkrts [-pthread], but I am not sure whether that's what you meant.