public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug libstdc++/60658] New: std::atomic<T*> is unexpectedly not lock-free
@ 2014-03-25 17:07 ppluzhnikov at google dot com
2014-03-25 18:45 ` [Bug libstdc++/60658] " redi at gcc dot gnu.org
` (6 more replies)
0 siblings, 7 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: ppluzhnikov at google dot com @ 2014-03-25 17:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60658
Bug ID: 60658
Summary: std::atomic<T*> is unexpectedly not lock-free
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libstdc++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: ppluzhnikov at google dot com
Using current trunk (r208813):
g++ -std=c++11 atomic.cc -latomic && ./a.out
a.out: atomic.cc:20: int main(): Assertion `b.is_lock_free()' failed.
As far as I can tell, this is happening because
std::__atomic_base<Bar*>::_M_type_size()
returns sizeof(Bar) instead of returning sizeof(Bar*).
// atomic.cc
#include <atomic>
#include <assert.h>
struct Foo {
char buf[1];
};
struct Bar {
char buf[100];
};
int
main ()
{
std::atomic<Foo*> a;
assert (a.is_lock_free());
std::atomic<Bar*> b;
assert (b.is_lock_free());
}
Google ref: b/13626319
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug libstdc++/60658] std::atomic<T*> is unexpectedly not lock-free
2014-03-25 17:07 [Bug libstdc++/60658] New: std::atomic<T*> is unexpectedly not lock-free ppluzhnikov at google dot com
@ 2014-03-25 18:45 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-03-25 19:17 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: redi at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-03-25 18:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60658
Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed| |2014-03-25
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Oops - I thought we'd fixed all those kind of bugs in the atomic<T*>
specialization
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug libstdc++/60658] std::atomic<T*> is unexpectedly not lock-free
2014-03-25 17:07 [Bug libstdc++/60658] New: std::atomic<T*> is unexpectedly not lock-free ppluzhnikov at google dot com
2014-03-25 18:45 ` [Bug libstdc++/60658] " redi at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2014-03-25 19:17 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-03-25 19:29 ` [Bug libstdc++/60658] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] " redi at gcc dot gnu.org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: redi at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-03-25 19:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60658
Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |redi at gcc dot gnu.org
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug libstdc++/60658] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] std::atomic<T*> is unexpectedly not lock-free
2014-03-25 17:07 [Bug libstdc++/60658] New: std::atomic<T*> is unexpectedly not lock-free ppluzhnikov at google dot com
2014-03-25 18:45 ` [Bug libstdc++/60658] " redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-03-25 19:17 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2014-03-25 19:29 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-03-25 19:40 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: redi at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-03-25 19:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60658
Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Known to work| |4.6.3
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.4
Summary|std::atomic<T*> is |[4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression]
|unexpectedly not lock-free |std::atomic<T*> is
| |unexpectedly not lock-free
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
This is a regression in all active branches
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug libstdc++/60658] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] std::atomic<T*> is unexpectedly not lock-free
2014-03-25 17:07 [Bug libstdc++/60658] New: std::atomic<T*> is unexpectedly not lock-free ppluzhnikov at google dot com
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2014-03-25 19:29 ` [Bug libstdc++/60658] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] " redi at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2014-03-25 19:40 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-03-25 20:14 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: redi at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-03-25 19:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60658
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Author: redi
Date: Tue Mar 25 19:39:52 2014
New Revision: 208819
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208819&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/60658
* include/bits/atomic_base.h (__atomic_base<_PTp*>::is_lock_free()):
Use sizeof pointer type not the element type.
* testsuite/29_atomics/atomic/60658.cc: New.
Added:
trunk/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/29_atomics/atomic/60658.cc
Modified:
trunk/libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog
trunk/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/atomic_base.h
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug libstdc++/60658] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] std::atomic<T*> is unexpectedly not lock-free
2014-03-25 17:07 [Bug libstdc++/60658] New: std::atomic<T*> is unexpectedly not lock-free ppluzhnikov at google dot com
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2014-03-25 19:40 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2014-03-25 20:14 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-03-25 20:40 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-03-25 20:42 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: redi at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-03-25 20:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60658
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Author: redi
Date: Tue Mar 25 20:13:46 2014
New Revision: 208820
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208820&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/60658
* include/bits/atomic_base.h (__atomic_base<_PTp*>::is_lock_free()):
Use sizeof pointer type not the element type.
* testsuite/29_atomics/atomic/60658.cc: New.
PR libstdc++/60658
* include/bits/atomic_base.h (__atomic_base<_PTp*>::is_lock_free()):
Use sizeof pointer type not the element type.
* testsuite/29_atomics/atomic/60658.cc: New.
Added:
branches/gcc-4_8-branch/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/29_atomics/atomic/60658.cc
Modified:
branches/gcc-4_8-branch/libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog
branches/gcc-4_8-branch/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/atomic_base.h
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug libstdc++/60658] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] std::atomic<T*> is unexpectedly not lock-free
2014-03-25 17:07 [Bug libstdc++/60658] New: std::atomic<T*> is unexpectedly not lock-free ppluzhnikov at google dot com
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2014-03-25 20:14 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2014-03-25 20:40 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-03-25 20:42 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: redi at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-03-25 20:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60658
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Author: redi
Date: Tue Mar 25 20:40:17 2014
New Revision: 208821
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208821&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/60658
* include/bits/atomic_base.h (__atomic_base<_PTp*>::is_lock_free()):
Use sizeof pointer type not the element type.
* testsuite/29_atomics/atomic/60658.cc: New.
Added:
branches/gcc-4_7-branch/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/29_atomics/atomic/60658.cc
Modified:
branches/gcc-4_7-branch/libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog
branches/gcc-4_7-branch/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/atomic_base.h
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug libstdc++/60658] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] std::atomic<T*> is unexpectedly not lock-free
2014-03-25 17:07 [Bug libstdc++/60658] New: std::atomic<T*> is unexpectedly not lock-free ppluzhnikov at google dot com
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2014-03-25 20:40 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2014-03-25 20:42 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: redi at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-03-25 20:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60658
Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Known to fail| |4.7.3, 4.8.2
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Fixed for 4.7.4, 4.8.3 and 4.9.0
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2014-03-25 20:42 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2014-03-25 17:07 [Bug libstdc++/60658] New: std::atomic<T*> is unexpectedly not lock-free ppluzhnikov at google dot com
2014-03-25 18:45 ` [Bug libstdc++/60658] " redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-03-25 19:17 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-03-25 19:29 ` [Bug libstdc++/60658] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] " redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-03-25 19:40 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-03-25 20:14 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-03-25 20:40 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-03-25 20:42 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).