From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5567 invoked by alias); 12 Dec 2014 16:13:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 5518 invoked by uid 48); 12 Dec 2014 16:13:33 -0000 From: "ramana at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/60691] Build fails in libstdc++ with --enable-sjlj-exceptions on ARM Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2014 16:13:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.8.2 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: major X-Bugzilla-Who: ramana at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2014-12/txt/msg01446.txt.bz2 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60691 --- Comment #8 from Ramana Radhakrishnan --- (In reply to Fabian Vogt from comment #6) > If sjlj exceptions are not supported for ARM, shouldn't the configure option > be invalid for ARM or at least print a warning? > If an option does exist and it simply crashes the compiler during make, it's > definitely broken and must be removed. If that were a user option then yes, I agree. If folks are building their own toolchains, they should know what they are doing and not just use options because they think it may just work willy-nilly.