http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60722

            Bug ID: 60722
           Summary: __builtin_choose_expr() does not allow 'CONST_EXP'
                    using const variable
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.9.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: c
          Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
          Reporter: yann at droneaud dot fr

Created attachment 32498
  --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32498&action=edit
testcase

Hi,

I'm trying to use __builtin_choose_expr() with a test against a const variable:

#define VALUE 123

int
test(void)
{
    const int value = VALUE;
    int v1, v2;

    v1 = __builtin_choose_expr(__builtin_constant_p(VALUE),
                   (__builtin_choose_expr(VALUE >= 10,
                              2,
                              (__builtin_choose_expr(VALUE >= 0,
                                         1,
                                         0)))),
                    -1);

    v1 = __builtin_choose_expr(__builtin_constant_p(value),
                   (__builtin_choose_expr(value >= 10,
                              2,
                              (__builtin_choose_expr(value >= 0,
                                         1,
                                         0)))),
                   -1);

    return v1 - v2;
}




The first expression is considering a constant defined as a macro.
And the second expression is considering a constant variable.

With gcc 4.9.0 20140313 (experimental), I'm facing the following error:

$ /opt/gcc/bin/gcc -O2 -c test.c 
test.c: In function ‘test’:
test.c:21:11: erreur: first argument to ‘__builtin_choose_expr’ not a constant
          (__builtin_choose_expr(value >= 0,
           ^
test.c:19:9: erreur: first argument to ‘__builtin_choose_expr’ not a constant
        (__builtin_choose_expr(value >= 10,
         ^

(Note: with gcc 4.8, I'm also having the issue with _builtin_constant_p(value),
as bug #19449)


It's a pity gcc is not able to consider (value >= 0) as a constant expression
while its obvious
that 'value' is a constant variable (!).

It makes usage of __builtin_choose_expr() not applicable in my case.
>From gcc-bugs-return-447955-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Mon Mar 31 14:33:04 2014
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-447955-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 8662 invoked by alias); 31 Mar 2014 14:33:04 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 8529 invoked by uid 48); 31 Mar 2014 14:33:01 -0000
From: "burnus at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/60653] [4.9 Regression] gfortran: ICE (segmentation fault) in lra
Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2014 14:33:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.9.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: WAITING
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.9.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: attachments.created
Message-ID: <bug-60653-4-qyF0ruiAGH@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-60653-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-60653-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2014-03/txt/msg02824.txt.bz2
Content-length: 371

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id`653

--- Comment #8 from Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Created attachment 32499
  --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id2499&actioníit
Reduced Fortran test case (use .f or .f90 suffix)

Reduced test case attached. Compile on arm-linux-gnueabihf with "gfortran -O1";
works with "gfortran -O0".