public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "manu at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug preprocessor/60723] Line directives with incorrect system header flag Date: Tue, 01 Apr 2014 09:51:00 -0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <bug-60723-4-0ykypgHXzG@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw) In-Reply-To: <bug-60723-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60723 Manuel López-Ibáñez <manu at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |manu at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #4 from Manuel López-Ibáñez <manu at gcc dot gnu.org> --- Patches go to the gcc-patches mailing list for review. You will also need a testcase formatted for inclusion on the testsuite and test your patch against the GCC testsuite. See also: http://gcc.gnu.org/contribute.html > In a function-like macro expansion, regular tokens are line-marked as being > expanded at the opening parenthesis, while builtins are line-marked as being > expanded at the closing parenthesis (both of these choices are reasonable, > though the inconsistency is probably a design flaw). When a non-builtin > follows a builtin in a multiline macro call, the line numbers of the tokens > are inconsistent, forcing a line directive to be inserted. I don't see how your patch fixes this inconsistency. >From gcc-bugs-return-448011-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Apr 01 09:57:09 2014 Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-448011-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org> Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 2294 invoked by alias); 1 Apr 2014 09:57:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org> List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/> List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org> Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 2244 invoked by uid 55); 1 Apr 2014 09:57:06 -0000 From: "amker at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/60363] [4.9 Regression]: logical_op_short_circuit, gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-dom-thread-4.c scan-tree-dump-times dom1 "Threaded" 4 Date: Tue, 01 Apr 2014 09:57:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.9.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: amker at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Priority: P1 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.9.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: <bug-60363-4-eHmN9gU1AH@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-60363-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-60363-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2014-04/txt/msg00031.txt.bz2 Content-length: 455 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id`363 --- Comment #12 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: amker Date: Tue Apr 1 09:56:29 2014 New Revision: 208980 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev 8980&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR target/60363 * gcc.target/tree-ssa/ssa-dom-thread-4.c: Xfail for logical_op_short_circuit targets. Modified: trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-dom-thread-4.c
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-04-01 9:51 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2014-04-01 1:37 [Bug preprocessor/60723] New: " nicholas.ormrod at hotmail dot com 2014-04-01 1:37 ` [Bug preprocessor/60723] " nicholas.ormrod at hotmail dot com 2014-04-01 1:38 ` nicholas.ormrod at hotmail dot com 2014-04-01 1:39 ` nicholas.ormrod at hotmail dot com 2014-04-01 9:51 ` manu at gcc dot gnu.org [this message] 2014-04-01 15:30 ` nicholas.ormrod at hotmail dot com 2014-06-10 6:21 ` nicholas.ormrod at hotmail dot com 2014-06-10 13:18 ` matt at godbolt dot org 2014-06-15 22:31 ` nicholas.ormrod at hotmail dot com 2014-06-25 15:32 ` dodji at gcc dot gnu.org 2014-07-01 9:18 ` dodji at gcc dot gnu.org 2014-07-01 14:13 ` christophe.lyon at st dot com 2014-07-01 14:16 ` christophe.lyon at st dot com 2014-07-02 13:43 ` dodji at gcc dot gnu.org 2014-07-02 13:44 ` dodji at gcc dot gnu.org 2014-07-03 13:48 ` christophe.lyon at st dot com 2014-07-16 8:58 ` dodji at gcc dot gnu.org 2014-07-16 10:34 ` dodji at gcc dot gnu.org 2014-07-16 13:38 ` dodji at gcc dot gnu.org 2014-07-17 3:36 ` nicholas.ormrod at hotmail dot com 2014-07-22 9:55 ` ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org 2014-07-24 8:22 ` ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-02-05 10:07 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-03-26 23:31 ` egallager at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-10-12 22:16 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=bug-60723-4-0ykypgHXzG@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).