From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5339 invoked by alias); 2 Apr 2014 17:49:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 5302 invoked by uid 48); 2 Apr 2014 17:49:29 -0000 From: "brooks at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/60732] FAIL: g++.dg/ext/altivec-7.C -std=* scan-assembler _Z3fooDv* Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2014 17:49:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.9.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: brooks at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2014-04/txt/msg00163.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60732 --- Comment #4 from Brooks Moses --- Interesting. As noted, with -fabi-version=[1 to 3] on Linux, I was getting both sets. Mike, what do you think is the best solution here? We could use Dominique's patch with a comment to the effect that "New-ABI symbols are always emitted on Linux, but only with -fabi-version=4 or later on Darwin." We could revert my change and hardcode -fabi-version=2 for all targets. Or we could take the suggestion from your original review email and duplicate the test into new-ABI and old-ABI versions, and do both of those. (If we duplicate the test, is altivec-7a.C a reasonable name for the duplicate-with-different-ABI, or does it need to be altivec-18.C or whatever the next available number is?)