From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25813 invoked by alias); 3 Apr 2014 23:22:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 25790 invoked by uid 48); 3 Apr 2014 23:22:41 -0000 From: "filip.roseen at gmail dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/60753] New: defining an explicit function template specialization as deleted, following a non-deleted declaration, not diagnosted Date: Thu, 03 Apr 2014 23:22:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: new X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.9.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: filip.roseen at gmail dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter attachments.created Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2014-04/txt/msg00262.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60753 Bug ID: 60753 Summary: defining an explicit function template specialization as deleted, following a non-deleted declaration, not diagnosted Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: filip.roseen at gmail dot com Created attachment 32537 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32537&action=edit testcase.cpp template void func (T); template<> void func (int); template<> void func (int) = delete; int main () { } ------------------------------------------------------------------------ `gcc` accepts the above snippet. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ The previous snippet is ill-formed according to [dcl.fct.def.delete]p4: > A deleted definition of a function shall be the first declaration > of the function or, for an explicit specialization of a function > template, the first declaration of that specialization. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ `clang` correctly issues the following diagnostic: testcase.cpp:4:35: error: deleted definition must be first declaration template<> void func (int) = delete; ^ testcase.cpp:3:17: note: previous declaration is here template<> void func (int); ^ ------------------------------------------------------------------------