From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11196 invoked by alias); 28 Jun 2014 07:26:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 11133 invoked by uid 48); 28 Jun 2014 07:26:01 -0000 From: "glisse at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/60770] disappearing clobbers Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2014 07:26:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.9.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: diagnostic X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: glisse at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: attachments.created Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2014-06/txt/msg02269.txt.bz2 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60770 --- Comment #7 from Marc Glisse --- Created attachment 33024 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33024&action=edit replace clobber with default def This passes bootstrap+testsuite with all default languages, but it breaks ada, I get plenty of warnings (as if it was reading objects after clobbering them) and 2 errors about "Unable to coalesce ssa_names [...] which are marked as MUST COALESCE." I am probably doing something wrong in the patch, but ada seems to be using clobbers differently than others since it is the only one that notices (well, I didn't have a chance to check go since ada broke early). It would also be nice to save the info somewhere that this default def actually comes from a clobber, so the uninit pass can give a different warning message. Maybe there is a bit available in the gimple_nop...