[Bug target/60773] FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/pr60656.c -flto -ffat-lto-objects scan-tree-dump-times vect "vectorized 1 loops" 1

[Bug target/60773] FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/pr60656.c -flto -ffat-lto-objects scan-tree-dump-times vect "vectorized 1 loops" 1

[schwab@linux-m68k.org]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60773

Andreas Schwab <schwab@linux-m68k.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Target Milestone|---                         |4.9.0

[Bug target/60773] New: FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/pr60656.c -flto -ffat-lto-objects scan-tree-dump-times vect "vectorized 1 loops" 1

[schwab@linux-m68k.org]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60773

            Bug ID: 60773
           Summary: FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/pr60656.c -flto -ffat-lto-objects
                    scan-tree-dump-times vect "vectorized 1 loops" 1
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.9.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: target
          Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
          Reporter: schwab@linux-m68k.org
            Target: powerpc64-*-*

configure flags: --prefix=/usr --build=powerpc64-linux
--enable-checking=release --enable-shared --with-system-zlib CFLAGS='-O2 -g'
CXXFLAGS='-O2 -g' --with-cpu-64=power4 --enable-secureplt
--with-long-double-128

$ gcc/xgcc -Bgcc/ ../gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/pr60656.c
-fno-diagnostics-show-caret -fdiagnostics-color=never -flto -ffat-lto-objects
-maltivec -ftree-vectorize -fno-vect-cost-model -fno-common -O2
-fdump-tree-vect-details -lm -m64 -o ./pr60656.exe
$ grep vectorized pr60656.c.114t.vect 
../gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/pr60656.c:12:3: note: ===
vect_mark_stmts_to_be_vectorized ===
../gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/pr60656.c:12:3: note: not vectorized: relevant
stmt not supported: P_6 = (long int) _5;
../gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/pr60656.c:6:1: note: vectorized 0 loops in
function.
../gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/pr60656.c:27:3: note: not vectorized: loop
contains function calls or data references that cannot be analyzed
../gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/pr60656.c:21:1: note: vectorized 0 loops in
function.
../gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/pr60656.c:27:3: note: not vectorized: loop
contains function calls or data references that cannot be analyzed
../gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/pr60656.c:36:5: note: vectorized 0 loops in
function.

[Bug target/60773] FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/pr60656.c -flto -ffat-lto-objects scan-tree-dump-times vect "vectorized 1 loops" 1

[rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60773

Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |congh at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
You miss calling check_vect() from main and checking for vectorizing long
support
(and widening).

[Bug target/60773] [4.9 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/pr60656.c -flto -ffat-lto-objects scan-tree-dump-times vect "vectorized 1 loops" 1

[rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60773

Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Target|powerpc64-*-*               |powerpc64-*-*, i?86-*-*
           Priority|P3                          |P1
            Summary|FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/pr60656.c |[4.9 Regression] FAIL:
                   |-flto -ffat-lto-objects     |gcc.dg/vect/pr60656.c -flto
                   |scan-tree-dump-times vect   |-ffat-lto-objects
                   |"vectorized 1 loops" 1      |scan-tree-dump-times vect
                   |                            |"vectorized 1 loops" 1

[Bug testsuite/60773] [4.9 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/pr60656.c -flto -ffat-lto-objects scan-tree-dump-times vect "vectorized 1 loops" 1

[jakub at gcc dot gnu.org]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60773

--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Apr  9 11:37:14 2014
New Revision: 209241

URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=209241&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-04-09  Cong Hou  <congh@google.com>

    PR testsuite/60773
    * doc/sourcebuild.texi (vect_widen_mult_si_to_di_pattern): Add
    documentation.

    * lib/target-supports.exp:
    (check_effective_target_vect_widen_si_to_di_pattern): New.
    * gcc.dg/vect/pr60656.c: Require vect_long effective target.
    Use scan-tree-dump-times for vect_widen_mult_si_to_di_pattern
    targets only.
    (foo): Fix up formatting.
    (main): Call check_vect.

Modified:
    trunk/gcc/ChangeLog
    trunk/gcc/doc/sourcebuild.texi
    trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
    trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/pr60656.c
    trunk/gcc/testsuite/lib/target-supports.exp

[Bug testsuite/60773] [4.9 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/pr60656.c -flto -ffat-lto-objects scan-tree-dump-times vect "vectorized 1 loops" 1

[jakub at gcc dot gnu.org]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60773

Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |RESOLVED
                 CC|                            |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
         Resolution|---                         |FIXED

--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
I went ahead and committed the fix.

[Bug testsuite/60773] [4.9 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/pr60656.c -flto -ffat-lto-objects scan-tree-dump-times vect "vectorized 1 loops" 1

[congh at google dot com]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60773

--- Comment #5 from Cong Hou <congh at google dot com> ---
Hi Jakub

Thank you very much for the commit!


thanks,
Cong


On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 4:39 AM, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
<gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60773
>
> Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
>
>            What    |Removed                     |Added
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>              Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |RESOLVED
>                  CC|                            |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
>          Resolution|---                         |FIXED
>
> --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
> I went ahead and committed the fix.
>
> --
> You are receiving this mail because:
> You are on the CC list for the bug.