public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "dominiq at lps dot ens.fr" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/60780] Equivalence statements in nested modules results in fast growing duplicate statements in module files
Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2015 10:22:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-60780-4-8o7YriH1pw@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-60780-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60780
--- Comment #5 from Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> ---
I have doubled the number of modules to get the following results
gcc version 4.8.5
21.907u 0.994s 0:23.00 99.5% 0+0k 0+22io 3pf+0w
-rw-r--r-- 1 dominiq staff 2923 Mar 9 10:59 module0.mod
-rw-r--r-- 1 dominiq staff 3079 Mar 9 10:59 module1.mod
-rw-r--r-- 1 dominiq staff 4230 Mar 9 10:59 module2.mod
-rw-r--r-- 1 dominiq staff 6376 Mar 9 10:59 module3.mod
-rw-r--r-- 1 dominiq staff 10512 Mar 9 10:59 module4.mod
-rw-r--r-- 1 dominiq staff 18628 Mar 9 10:59 module5.mod
-rw-r--r-- 1 dominiq staff 34704 Mar 9 10:59 module6.mod
-rw-r--r-- 1 dominiq staff 66700 Mar 9 10:59 module7.mod
-rw-r--r-- 1 dominiq staff 130536 Mar 9 10:59 module8.mod
-rw-r--r-- 1 dominiq staff 258052 Mar 9 10:59 module9.mod
-rw-r--r-- 1 dominiq staff 512931 Mar 9 10:59 module10.mod
-rw-r--r-- 1 dominiq staff 1022530 Mar 9 10:59 module11.mod
-rw-r--r-- 1 dominiq staff 2041569 Mar 9 10:59 module12.mod
-rw-r--r-- 1 dominiq staff 4079488 Mar 9 10:59 module13.mod
-rw-r--r-- 1 dominiq staff 8155167 Mar 9 10:59 module14.mod
-rw-r--r-- 1 dominiq staff 16306366 Mar 9 10:59 module15.mod
-rw-r--r-- 1 dominiq staff 32608774 Mar 9 10:59 module16.mod
gcc version 4.9.3
5.432u 0.389s 0:06.00 96.8% 0+0k 8+19io 1355pf+0w
-rw-r--r-- 1 dominiq staff 485 Mar 9 11:03 module0.mod
-rw-r--r-- 1 dominiq staff 498 Mar 9 11:03 module1.mod
-rw-r--r-- 1 dominiq staff 526 Mar 9 11:03 module2.mod
-rw-r--r-- 1 dominiq staff 560 Mar 9 11:03 module3.mod
-rw-r--r-- 1 dominiq staff 602 Mar 9 11:03 module4.mod
-rw-r--r-- 1 dominiq staff 668 Mar 9 11:03 module5.mod
-rw-r--r-- 1 dominiq staff 770 Mar 9 11:03 module6.mod
-rw-r--r-- 1 dominiq staff 952 Mar 9 11:03 module7.mod
-rw-r--r-- 1 dominiq staff 1279 Mar 9 11:03 module8.mod
-rw-r--r-- 1 dominiq staff 1911 Mar 9 11:03 module9.mod
-rw-r--r-- 1 dominiq staff 3165 Mar 9 11:03 module10.mod
-rw-r--r-- 1 dominiq staff 5650 Mar 9 11:03 module11.mod
-rw-r--r-- 1 dominiq staff 10603 Mar 9 11:03 module12.mod
-rw-r--r-- 1 dominiq staff 20493 Mar 9 11:03 module13.mod
-rw-r--r-- 1 dominiq staff 40276 Mar 9 11:03 module14.mod
-rw-r--r-- 1 dominiq staff 79811 Mar 9 11:03 module15.mod
-rw-r--r-- 1 dominiq staff 158891 Mar 9 11:03 module16.mod
gcc version 5.0.0
5.525u 0.381s 0:06.06 97.3% 0+0k 9+23io 1605pf+0w
-rw-r--r-- 1 dominiq staff 485 Mar 9 11:07 module0.mod
-rw-r--r-- 1 dominiq staff 500 Mar 9 11:07 module1.mod
-rw-r--r-- 1 dominiq staff 529 Mar 9 11:07 module2.mod
-rw-r--r-- 1 dominiq staff 562 Mar 9 11:07 module3.mod
-rw-r--r-- 1 dominiq staff 606 Mar 9 11:07 module4.mod
-rw-r--r-- 1 dominiq staff 672 Mar 9 11:07 module5.mod
-rw-r--r-- 1 dominiq staff 774 Mar 9 11:07 module6.mod
-rw-r--r-- 1 dominiq staff 956 Mar 9 11:07 module7.mod
-rw-r--r-- 1 dominiq staff 1283 Mar 9 11:07 module8.mod
-rw-r--r-- 1 dominiq staff 1915 Mar 9 11:07 module9.mod
-rw-r--r-- 1 dominiq staff 3170 Mar 9 11:07 module10.mod
-rw-r--r-- 1 dominiq staff 5650 Mar 9 11:07 module11.mod
-rw-r--r-- 1 dominiq staff 10603 Mar 9 11:07 module12.mod
-rw-r--r-- 1 dominiq staff 20493 Mar 9 11:07 module13.mod
-rw-r--r-- 1 dominiq staff 40276 Mar 9 11:07 module14.mod
-rw-r--r-- 1 dominiq staff 79811 Mar 9 11:07 module15.mod
-rw-r--r-- 1 dominiq staff 158891 Mar 9 11:07 module16.mod
gcc version 5.0.0 with the patch in pr40958 comment 18
0.045u 0.034s 0:00.24 29.1% 0+0k 12+18io 1767pf+0w
-rw-r--r-- 1 dominiq staff 485 Mar 9 11:07 module0.mod
-rw-r--r-- 1 dominiq staff 500 Mar 9 11:07 module1.mod
-rw-r--r-- 1 dominiq staff 515 Mar 9 11:09 module2.mod
-rw-r--r-- 1 dominiq staff 527 Mar 9 11:09 module3.mod
-rw-r--r-- 1 dominiq staff 539 Mar 9 11:09 module4.mod
-rw-r--r-- 1 dominiq staff 552 Mar 9 11:09 module5.mod
-rw-r--r-- 1 dominiq staff 567 Mar 9 11:09 module6.mod
-rw-r--r-- 1 dominiq staff 578 Mar 9 11:09 module7.mod
-rw-r--r-- 1 dominiq staff 590 Mar 9 11:09 module8.mod
-rw-r--r-- 1 dominiq staff 603 Mar 9 11:09 module9.mod
-rw-r--r-- 1 dominiq staff 621 Mar 9 11:09 module10.mod
-rw-r--r-- 1 dominiq staff 632 Mar 9 11:09 module11.mod
-rw-r--r-- 1 dominiq staff 647 Mar 9 11:09 module12.mod
-rw-r--r-- 1 dominiq staff 663 Mar 9 11:09 module13.mod
-rw-r--r-- 1 dominiq staff 677 Mar 9 11:09 module14.mod
-rw-r--r-- 1 dominiq staff 692 Mar 9 11:09 module15.mod
-rw-r--r-- 1 dominiq staff 728 Mar 9 11:09 module16.mod
Without the patch the module sizes double each time a module is added
(asymptotic behavior) while the prefactor for 4.9 and 5.0 is ~200 smaller
compared to 4.8. With the patch, the compile time is negligible and the module
sizes increase is quite small (linear?).
May be the patch should be submitted to fortran@gcc.gnu.org (for next stage1).
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-03-09 10:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-04-07 17:27 [Bug fortran/60780] New: " russelldub at gmail dot com
2014-04-07 17:41 ` [Bug fortran/60780] " russelldub at gmail dot com
2014-04-09 8:27 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2014-10-08 1:58 ` russelldub at gmail dot com
2014-10-08 2:00 ` russelldub at gmail dot com
2015-03-09 10:22 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr [this message]
2015-03-09 18:49 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-03-09 18:57 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2015-03-11 5:12 ` russelldub at gmail dot com
2015-06-05 16:55 ` kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-06-05 20:41 ` kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-06-05 20:42 ` kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bug-60780-4-8o7YriH1pw@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
--to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).