From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-448765-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 9042 invoked by alias); 11 Apr 2014 07:39:17 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 8942 invoked by uid 48); 11 Apr 2014 07:39:12 -0000
From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c/60804] Another CilkPlus ICE in gimplify_expr, at gimplify.c:8335
Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2014 07:39:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.9.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-60804-4-M2K6nLPqXE@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-60804-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-60804-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2014-04/txt/msg00785.txt.bz2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60804

--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
According to
http://software.intel.com/sites/products/documentation/doclib/stdxe/2013/composerxe/compiler/cpp-win/index.htm
as well as
http://www.cilkplus.org/sites/default/files/open_specifications/cilk_plus_language_specification_0_9.pdf
this isn't valid (but we should then diagnose it), but whether these two (and
which one of them) are the latest Cilk+ spec is unclear to me.