public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "rth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/60851] [4.9 Regression] ICE: in extract_constrain_insn_cached, at recog.c:2117 with -flive-range-shrinkage -mdispatch-scheduler -march=bdver4
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2015 16:14:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-60851-4-452YfPRXYe@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-60851-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60851

--- Comment #14 from Richard Henderson <rth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #13)
> In 4.9 branch, the check is located in three different places throughout
> constrain_operands. There was a big cleanup by Richard Sandiford in this
> area [1].

Looks good.
>From gcc-bugs-return-481273-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Mon Mar 23 15:45:42 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-481273-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 5622 invoked by alias); 23 Mar 2015 15:45:42 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 5564 invoked by uid 48); 23 Mar 2015 15:45:36 -0000
From: "redi at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug libstdc++/64967] [5 Regression] Bootstrap fails due to errors in libstdc++ sources with `--enable-symvers=gnu-versioned-namespace'
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2015 16:15:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: libstdc++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: redi at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P4
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: redi at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 5.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-64967-4-znfplVOmPD@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-64967-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-64967-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-03/txt/msg02417.txt.bz2
Content-length: 636

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?idd967

--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #2)
> Or drop the gnu-versioned-namespace support altogether.

I'd like to do that ... maybe for GCC 6 though. It seems a bit late now to
remove it without deprecation.

> Anyway, if you don't, bumping it to _8 and always using the new ABI sounds
> like a good plan to me.

That proved quite difficult. My plan for now is to simply force
--disable-libstdcxx-dual-abi when gnu-versioned-namespace is in use, so it
bootstraps and can be used, just without the new GCC 5 hotness.


  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-03-23 15:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-04-15 19:15 [Bug target/60851] New: " zsojka at seznam dot cz
2014-04-16  9:03 ` [Bug target/60851] [4.9/4.10 Regression] " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-04-16 13:02 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-04-16 14:58 ` rth at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-04-18  7:03 ` zsojka at seznam dot cz
2014-04-22 11:35 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-06-26 13:00 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-07-16 13:27 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-10-30 10:37 ` [Bug target/60851] [4.9/5 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-02-24 11:19 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-03-19  7:30 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/60851] " ubizjak at gmail dot com
2015-03-20  8:32 ` uros at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-03-22 20:16 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/60851] [4.9 " ubizjak at gmail dot com
2015-03-22 21:11 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com
2015-03-23 16:14 ` rth at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2015-03-24  7:50 ` uros at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-03-24  8:13 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-60851-4-452YfPRXYe@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).