[Bug rtl-optimization/60866] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] ICE: in get_seqno_for_a_jump, at sel-sched-ir.c:4068 with -fselective-scheduling -fno-if-conversion

["ubizjak at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60866

Uroš Bizjak <ubizjak at gmail dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|RESOLVED                    |ASSIGNED
         Resolution|FIXED                       |---
            Summary|[4.7/4.8/4.9/4.10           |[4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression]
                   |Regression] ICE: in         |ICE: in
                   |get_seqno_for_a_jump, at    |get_seqno_for_a_jump, at
                   |sel-sched-ir.c:4068 with    |sel-sched-ir.c:4068 with
                   |-fselective-scheduling      |-fselective-scheduling
                   |-fno-if-conversion          |-fno-if-conversion

--- Comment #6 from Uroš Bizjak <ubizjak at gmail dot com> ---
Not yet fixed on release branches.
>From gcc-bugs-return-451605-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed May 14 13:29:47 2014
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-451605-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 11702 invoked by alias); 14 May 2014 13:29:47 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 11662 invoked by uid 48); 14 May 2014 13:29:43 -0000
From: "emsr at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug libstdc++/61166] overflow when parse number in std::duration operator""
Date: Wed, 14 May 2014 13:29:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: libstdc++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.9.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: emsr at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-61166-4-c79pIUsir1@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-61166-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-61166-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2014-05/txt/msg01297.txt.bz2
Content-length: 397

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?ida166

--- Comment #6 from emsr at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Something like parse_number was in the original doc as an implementation
example.  The idea was to select the smallest integral type that could
accommodate the number string with.  This is done with _Select_int.
_Select_type picks the most space-efficient duration ratio type using
_Select_int.