From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25872 invoked by alias); 21 Jul 2014 12:31:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 25796 invoked by uid 48); 21 Jul 2014 12:31:45 -0000 From: "ubizjak at gmail dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug go/60874] FAIL: go.test/test/recover.go execution Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2014 12:31:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: go X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.9.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: ubizjak at gmail dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: ian at airs dot com X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2014-07/txt/msg01452.txt.bz2 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D60874 Uro=C5=A1 Bizjak changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|WAITING |NEW --- Comment #3 from Uro=C5=A1 Bizjak --- (In reply to Ian Lance Taylor from comment #2) > The patch is committed so this bug may be fixed. I haven't tested it on > Alpha, though. The testcase recover.go doesn't fail outright with not-implemented error. However, tests test11reflect2, test13reflect2 and test14reflect2 currently fail. >>From gcc-bugs-return-456862-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Mon Jul 21 13:01:55 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 32466 invoked by alias); 21 Jul 2014 13:01:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 32416 invoked by uid 48); 21 Jul 2014 13:01:49 -0000 From: "redi at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/61867] gcc can't detect obviously false test Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2014 13:01:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.9.1 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: redi at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2014-07/txt/msg01453.txt.bz2 Content-length: 241 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61867 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely --- I'm pretty sure gcc does detect it and optimizes appropriately, it just doesn't warn (because it's not a static analyzer)