* [Bug fortran/60898] model compile error with gfortran 4.7 and gcc 4.9 on Mac OS 10.9
2014-04-20 3:06 [Bug fortran/60898] New: model compile error with gfortran 4.7 and gcc 4.9 on Mac OS 10.9 shaojuncycle at gmail dot com
@ 2014-04-21 13:02 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2014-04-23 1:49 ` shaojuncycle at gmail dot com
` (23 subsequent siblings)
24 siblings, 0 replies; 26+ messages in thread
From: dominiq at lps dot ens.fr @ 2014-04-21 13:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60898
Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed| |2014-04-21
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> ---
Did you
See <http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html> for instructions.
?
Apparently not. You have to provide the code for plib8b.f90 (along with files
for needed modules and includes). Note that it will help if you can reduce the
code.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 26+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/60898] model compile error with gfortran 4.7 and gcc 4.9 on Mac OS 10.9
2014-04-20 3:06 [Bug fortran/60898] New: model compile error with gfortran 4.7 and gcc 4.9 on Mac OS 10.9 shaojuncycle at gmail dot com
2014-04-21 13:02 ` [Bug fortran/60898] " dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
@ 2014-04-23 1:49 ` shaojuncycle at gmail dot com
2014-04-23 2:49 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
` (22 subsequent siblings)
24 siblings, 0 replies; 26+ messages in thread
From: shaojuncycle at gmail dot com @ 2014-04-23 1:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60898
--- Comment #2 from cycle <shaojuncycle at gmail dot com> ---
Thank you for you reply.
The code file plib8b.f90 is in the attachment.
2014-04-21 21:02 GMT+08:00 dominiq at lps dot ens.fr <
gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60898
>
> Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> changed:
>
> What |Removed |Added
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
> Last reconfirmed| |2014-04-21
> Ever confirmed|0 |1
>
> --- Comment #1 from Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> ---
> Did you
> See <http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html> for instructions.
> ?
>
> Apparently not. You have to provide the code for plib8b.f90 (along with
> files
> for needed modules and includes). Note that it will help if you can reduce
> the
> code.
>
> --
> You are receiving this mail because:
> You reported the bug.
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 26+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/60898] model compile error with gfortran 4.7 and gcc 4.9 on Mac OS 10.9
2014-04-20 3:06 [Bug fortran/60898] New: model compile error with gfortran 4.7 and gcc 4.9 on Mac OS 10.9 shaojuncycle at gmail dot com
2014-04-21 13:02 ` [Bug fortran/60898] " dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2014-04-23 1:49 ` shaojuncycle at gmail dot com
@ 2014-04-23 2:49 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-05-02 10:30 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
` (21 subsequent siblings)
24 siblings, 0 replies; 26+ messages in thread
From: jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-04-23 2:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60898
Jerry DeLisle <jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3 from Jerry DeLisle <jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
After providing all the missing 'USE' items:
plib8b-1.f90: In function ‘master.1.mulyb’:
plib8b-1.f90:1992:0: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
END SUBROUTINE mulbd
^
0x9fa86f crash_signal
../../trunk/gcc/toplev.c:337
0x9f7178 get_identifier(char const*)
../../trunk/gcc/stringpool.c:111
0x619940 generate_namelist_decl
../../trunk/gcc/fortran/trans-decl.c:4179
0x61a066 generate_local_nml_decl
../../trunk/gcc/fortran/trans-decl.c:4967
0x5da673 do_traverse_symtree
../../trunk/gcc/fortran/symbol.c:3575
0x61a1f7 generate_local_vars
../../trunk/gcc/fortran/trans-decl.c:4977
0x61a1f7 gfc_generate_function_code(gfc_namespace*)
../../trunk/gcc/fortran/trans-decl.c:5552
0x5f25a1 gfc_generate_module_code(gfc_namespace*)
../../trunk/gcc/fortran/trans.c:1972
0x5aee59 translate_all_program_units
../../trunk/gcc/fortran/parse.c:4522
0x5aee59 gfc_parse_file()
../../trunk/gcc/fortran/parse.c:4732
0x5ec145 gfc_be_parse_file
../../trunk/gcc/fortran/f95-lang.c:188
>From gcc-bugs-return-449634-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Apr 23 05:03:04 2014
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-449634-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 25332 invoked by alias); 23 Apr 2014 05:03:03 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 25228 invoked by uid 48); 23 Apr 2014 05:02:59 -0000
From: "y.gribov at samsung dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/60924] __attribute__((no_sanitize_address)) and friends should (only?) be allowed at function definitions
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2014 05:03:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: y.gribov at samsung dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-60924-4-0BQGlfjQAS@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-60924-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-60924-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2014-04/txt/msg01654.txt.bz2
Content-length: 756
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id`924
Yury Gribov <y.gribov at samsung dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |y.gribov at samsung dot com
--- Comment #4 from Yury Gribov <y.gribov at samsung dot com> ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #2)
> I don't see why, all other attributes are allowed on both declarations and
> definitions, having some attributes that are only allowed on definitions
> would be extremely confusing to users, and not really useful.
It's not just attributes - type specifiers may also be written only at
declarations and propagated to definitions.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 26+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/60898] model compile error with gfortran 4.7 and gcc 4.9 on Mac OS 10.9
2014-04-20 3:06 [Bug fortran/60898] New: model compile error with gfortran 4.7 and gcc 4.9 on Mac OS 10.9 shaojuncycle at gmail dot com
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2014-04-23 2:49 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2014-05-02 10:30 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2014-07-13 12:51 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
` (20 subsequent siblings)
24 siblings, 0 replies; 26+ messages in thread
From: dominiq at lps dot ens.fr @ 2014-05-02 10:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60898
--- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> ---
> After providing all the missing 'USE' items:
Where did you get them?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 26+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/60898] model compile error with gfortran 4.7 and gcc 4.9 on Mac OS 10.9
2014-04-20 3:06 [Bug fortran/60898] New: model compile error with gfortran 4.7 and gcc 4.9 on Mac OS 10.9 shaojuncycle at gmail dot com
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2014-05-02 10:30 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
@ 2014-07-13 12:51 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2014-07-13 12:55 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
` (19 subsequent siblings)
24 siblings, 0 replies; 26+ messages in thread
From: dominiq at lps dot ens.fr @ 2014-07-13 12:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60898
--- Comment #7 from Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> ---
Created attachment 33116
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33116&action=edit
Reduced test case
This is the smallest test I can get to gives an ICE
plib8b-1_red.f90: In function 'master.3.mulbb':
plib8b-1_red.f90:96:0: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault: 11
END SUBROUTINE mulvb
^
plib8b-1_red.f90:96:0: internal compiler error: Abort trap: 6
gfc: internal compiler error: Abort trap: 6 (program f951)
Abort
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 26+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/60898] model compile error with gfortran 4.7 and gcc 4.9 on Mac OS 10.9
2014-04-20 3:06 [Bug fortran/60898] New: model compile error with gfortran 4.7 and gcc 4.9 on Mac OS 10.9 shaojuncycle at gmail dot com
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2014-07-13 12:51 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
@ 2014-07-13 12:55 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2014-07-13 21:51 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
` (18 subsequent siblings)
24 siblings, 0 replies; 26+ messages in thread
From: dominiq at lps dot ens.fr @ 2014-07-13 12:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60898
--- Comment #8 from Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> ---
Backtrace for the reduced test case
* thread #1: tid = 0x1357c7a, 0x00000001000afb00
f951`count_st_nodes(st=<unavailable>) + 16 at symbol.c:3580, queue =
'com.apple.main-thread', stop reason = EXC_BAD_ACCESS (code=1, address=0x9)
frame #0: 0x00000001000afb00 f951`count_st_nodes(st=<unavailable>) + 16 at
symbol.c:3580
3577 if (!st)
3578 return 0;
3579
-> 3580 nodes = count_st_nodes (st->left);
3581 nodes++;
3582 nodes += count_st_nodes (st->right);
3583
(lldb) bt
* thread #1: tid = 0x1357c7a, 0x00000001000afb00
f951`count_st_nodes(st=<unavailable>) + 16 at symbol.c:3580, queue =
'com.apple.main-thread', stop reason = EXC_BAD_ACCESS (code=1, address=0x9)
* frame #0: 0x00000001000afb00 f951`count_st_nodes(st=<unavailable>) + 16 at
symbol.c:3580
frame #1: 0x00000001000afb09 f951`count_st_nodes(st=<unavailable>) + 25 at
symbol.c:3580
frame #2: 0x00000001000afb09 f951`count_st_nodes(st=<unavailable>) + 25 at
symbol.c:3580
frame #3: 0x00000001000afb09 f951`count_st_nodes(st=<unavailable>) + 25 at
symbol.c:3580
frame #4: 0x00000001000afb09 f951`count_st_nodes(st=<unavailable>) + 25 at
symbol.c:3580
frame #5: 0x00000001000afb09 f951`count_st_nodes(st=<unavailable>) + 25 at
symbol.c:3580
frame #6: 0x00000001000afb09 f951`count_st_nodes(st=<unavailable>) + 25 at
symbol.c:3580
frame #7: 0x00000001000afb09 f951`count_st_nodes(st=<unavailable>) + 25 at
symbol.c:3580
frame #8: 0x00000001000b1a61 f951`do_traverse_symtree(st=<unavailable>,
st_func=0x0000000000000000, sym_func=0x00000001000f6040) + 49 at symbol.c:3617
frame #9: 0x00000001000f7255
f951`gfc_generate_function_code(ns=0x0000000142052e00) + 373 at
trans-decl.c:5126
frame #10: 0x00000001000cb9b2
f951`gfc_generate_module_code(ns=<unavailable>) + 466 at trans.c:1998
frame #11: 0x00000001000817c3 f951`gfc_parse_file() + 167 at parse.c:4934
frame #12: 0x000000010008171c f951`gfc_parse_file() + 1116
frame #13: 0x00000001000c4c56 f951`gfc_be_parse_file + 38 at f95-lang.c:212
frame #14: 0x00000001008ba397 f951`compile_file + 39 at toplev.c:548
frame #15: 0x00000001008bcbbf f951`toplev_main(argc=2,
argv=0x00007fff5fbff440) + 3327 at toplev.c:1946
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 26+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/60898] model compile error with gfortran 4.7 and gcc 4.9 on Mac OS 10.9
2014-04-20 3:06 [Bug fortran/60898] New: model compile error with gfortran 4.7 and gcc 4.9 on Mac OS 10.9 shaojuncycle at gmail dot com
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2014-07-13 12:55 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
@ 2014-07-13 21:51 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-07-15 16:17 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
` (17 subsequent siblings)
24 siblings, 0 replies; 26+ messages in thread
From: jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-07-13 21:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60898
Jerry DeLisle <jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|WAITING |NEW
--- Comment #9 from Jerry DeLisle <jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Confirmed.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 26+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/60898] model compile error with gfortran 4.7 and gcc 4.9 on Mac OS 10.9
2014-04-20 3:06 [Bug fortran/60898] New: model compile error with gfortran 4.7 and gcc 4.9 on Mac OS 10.9 shaojuncycle at gmail dot com
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2014-07-13 21:51 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2014-07-15 16:17 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2014-07-15 16:31 ` [Bug fortran/60898] [4.8/4.9/4.10 Regression] model compile error with gfortran 4.7 and gcc 4.9 dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
` (16 subsequent siblings)
24 siblings, 0 replies; 26+ messages in thread
From: dominiq at lps dot ens.fr @ 2014-07-15 16:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60898
--- Comment #10 from Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #4)
> > After providing all the missing 'USE' items:
>
> Where did you get them?
Adding the following at the beginning of the original test allows to get the
error.
MODULE kinds
integer, parameter :: i_kind = 4, r_single = 4, r_double = 8
END MODULE kinds
MODULE constants
use kinds, only: r_kind => r_double
real(r_kind), parameter :: zero=0.0
real(r_kind), parameter :: one=1.0
real(r_kind), parameter :: two=2.0
real(r_kind), parameter :: three=3.0
real(r_kind), parameter :: four=4.0
real(r_kind), parameter :: five=5.0
real(r_kind), parameter :: half=0.5
END MODULE constants
MODULE MODULE_pmat1
END MODULE MODULE_pmat1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 26+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/60898] [4.8/4.9/4.10 Regression] model compile error with gfortran 4.7 and gcc 4.9
2014-04-20 3:06 [Bug fortran/60898] New: model compile error with gfortran 4.7 and gcc 4.9 on Mac OS 10.9 shaojuncycle at gmail dot com
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2014-07-15 16:17 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
@ 2014-07-15 16:31 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2014-07-15 16:34 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
` (15 subsequent siblings)
24 siblings, 0 replies; 26+ messages in thread
From: dominiq at lps dot ens.fr @ 2014-07-15 16:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60898
Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords| |ice-on-valid-code
Version|unknown |4.10.0
Summary|model compile error with |[4.8/4.9/4.10 Regression]
|gfortran 4.7 and gcc 4.9 on |model compile error with
|Mac OS 10.9 |gfortran 4.7 and gcc 4.9
--- Comment #11 from Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> ---
I have tried to compile the original and reduced tests with various version on
Mac OS 10.6 and 10.9 in order to bisect the revisions. However I have found
that for a given revision the tests compile or not depending on the "state" of
my computer (I'll attach a "session" showing this behavior).
The only revisions that compiles the code without error is 4.5.4 on darwin10
and 4.5.0 (r157963) on darwin13. I am marking the PR as a regression although
the bug is probably latent in 4.5. As pointed by Jerry DeLisle in comment 9,
the tests fail on x86_64-*-linux.
>From the reduced test, I am inclined to blame INTERFACE for ENTRY.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 26+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/60898] [4.8/4.9/4.10 Regression] model compile error with gfortran 4.7 and gcc 4.9
2014-04-20 3:06 [Bug fortran/60898] New: model compile error with gfortran 4.7 and gcc 4.9 on Mac OS 10.9 shaojuncycle at gmail dot com
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2014-07-15 16:31 ` [Bug fortran/60898] [4.8/4.9/4.10 Regression] model compile error with gfortran 4.7 and gcc 4.9 dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
@ 2014-07-15 16:34 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2014-07-15 18:03 ` anlauf at gmx dot de
` (14 subsequent siblings)
24 siblings, 0 replies; 26+ messages in thread
From: dominiq at lps dot ens.fr @ 2014-07-15 16:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60898
--- Comment #12 from Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> ---
Created attachment 33126
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33126&action=edit
Session showing erratic behavior of gfortran
gfortran-fsf-4.5 is 4.5.4,
gfortran-fsf-4.6 is 4.6.4,
gfortran-fsf-4.7 is 4.7.3,
/opt/gcc/gcc4.xp-y are 4.x revision y.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 26+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/60898] [4.8/4.9/4.10 Regression] model compile error with gfortran 4.7 and gcc 4.9
2014-04-20 3:06 [Bug fortran/60898] New: model compile error with gfortran 4.7 and gcc 4.9 on Mac OS 10.9 shaojuncycle at gmail dot com
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
2014-07-15 16:34 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
@ 2014-07-15 18:03 ` anlauf at gmx dot de
2014-11-19 13:28 ` [Bug fortran/60898] [4.8/4.9/5 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (13 subsequent siblings)
24 siblings, 0 replies; 26+ messages in thread
From: anlauf at gmx dot de @ 2014-07-15 18:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60898
Harald Anlauf <anlauf at gmx dot de> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |anlauf at gmx dot de
--- Comment #13 from Harald Anlauf <anlauf at gmx dot de> ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #11)
> The only revisions that compiles the code without error is 4.5.4 on darwin10
> and 4.5.0 (r157963) on darwin13. I am marking the PR as a regression
> although the bug is probably latent in 4.5. As pointed by Jerry DeLisle in
> comment 9, the tests fail on x86_64-*-linux.
Funny. I see a failure with -m64 with 4.3.5, 4.4.5 etc.,
but never with -m32 or with i686-pc-linux-gnu.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 26+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/60898] [4.8/4.9/5 Regression] model compile error with gfortran 4.7 and gcc 4.9
2014-04-20 3:06 [Bug fortran/60898] New: model compile error with gfortran 4.7 and gcc 4.9 on Mac OS 10.9 shaojuncycle at gmail dot com
` (10 preceding siblings ...)
2014-07-15 18:03 ` anlauf at gmx dot de
@ 2014-11-19 13:28 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-12-01 11:57 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (12 subsequent siblings)
24 siblings, 0 replies; 26+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-11-19 13:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60898
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|--- |4.8.4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 26+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/60898] [4.8/4.9/5 Regression] model compile error with gfortran 4.7 and gcc 4.9
2014-04-20 3:06 [Bug fortran/60898] New: model compile error with gfortran 4.7 and gcc 4.9 on Mac OS 10.9 shaojuncycle at gmail dot com
` (11 preceding siblings ...)
2014-11-19 13:28 ` [Bug fortran/60898] [4.8/4.9/5 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2014-12-01 11:57 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-12-01 22:30 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
` (11 subsequent siblings)
24 siblings, 0 replies; 26+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-12-01 11:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60898
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Priority|P3 |P4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 26+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/60898] [4.8/4.9/5 Regression] model compile error with gfortran 4.7 and gcc 4.9
2014-04-20 3:06 [Bug fortran/60898] New: model compile error with gfortran 4.7 and gcc 4.9 on Mac OS 10.9 shaojuncycle at gmail dot com
` (12 preceding siblings ...)
2014-12-01 11:57 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2014-12-01 22:30 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-12-19 13:35 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (10 subsequent siblings)
24 siblings, 0 replies; 26+ messages in thread
From: burnus at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-12-01 22:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60898
Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #14 from Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The following "fixes" the issue - but it leaks memory. The problem is that one
calls gfc_traverse_symtree with resolve_symbol. One then one fills all symtrees
from ns->sym_root into the vector st_vec. – If one now calls the sym_func(),
one might delete the symbol (gfc_release_symbol), but one later can access the
symbol via the copied symtree.
--- a/gcc/fortran/resolve.c
+++ b/gcc/fortran/resolve.c
@@ -12987,7 +12987,7 @@ resolve_symbol (gfc_symbol *sym)
{
this_symtree = gfc_find_symtree (gfc_current_ns->sym_root,
sym->name);
- gfc_release_symbol (sym);
+ // gfc_release_symbol (sym); // FIXME
symtree->n.sym->refs++;
this_symtree->n.sym = symtree->n.sym;
return;
>From gcc-bugs-return-469145-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Mon Dec 01 23:09:07 2014
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-469145-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 790 invoked by alias); 1 Dec 2014 23:09:06 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 730 invoked by uid 48); 1 Dec 2014 23:09:02 -0000
From: "hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug lto/64043] [5 Regression] ICE (segfault) with LTO: in tree_check/tree.h:2758 get_binfo_at_offset/tree.c:11914
Date: Mon, 01 Dec 2014 23:09:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: lto
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P1
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 5.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status assigned_to
Message-ID: <bug-64043-4-WGAEfBwob5@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-64043-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-64043-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2014-12/txt/msg00152.txt.bz2
Content-length: 449
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?idd043
Jan Hubicka <hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 from Jan Hubicka <hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Mine.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 26+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/60898] [4.8/4.9/5 Regression] model compile error with gfortran 4.7 and gcc 4.9
2014-04-20 3:06 [Bug fortran/60898] New: model compile error with gfortran 4.7 and gcc 4.9 on Mac OS 10.9 shaojuncycle at gmail dot com
` (13 preceding siblings ...)
2014-12-01 22:30 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2014-12-19 13:35 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-02-10 14:34 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
` (9 subsequent siblings)
24 siblings, 0 replies; 26+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-12-19 13:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60898
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|4.8.4 |4.8.5
--- Comment #15 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
GCC 4.8.4 has been released.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 26+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/60898] [4.8/4.9/5 Regression] model compile error with gfortran 4.7 and gcc 4.9
2014-04-20 3:06 [Bug fortran/60898] New: model compile error with gfortran 4.7 and gcc 4.9 on Mac OS 10.9 shaojuncycle at gmail dot com
` (14 preceding siblings ...)
2014-12-19 13:35 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-02-10 14:34 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-02-10 15:25 ` mikael at gcc dot gnu.org
` (8 subsequent siblings)
24 siblings, 0 replies; 26+ messages in thread
From: jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-02-10 14:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60898
--- Comment #16 from Jerry DeLisle <jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Is anyone working on this one?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 26+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/60898] [4.8/4.9/5 Regression] model compile error with gfortran 4.7 and gcc 4.9
2014-04-20 3:06 [Bug fortran/60898] New: model compile error with gfortran 4.7 and gcc 4.9 on Mac OS 10.9 shaojuncycle at gmail dot com
` (15 preceding siblings ...)
2015-02-10 14:34 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-02-10 15:25 ` mikael at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-02-14 15:27 ` mikael at gcc dot gnu.org
` (7 subsequent siblings)
24 siblings, 0 replies; 26+ messages in thread
From: mikael at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-02-10 15:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60898
Mikael Morin <mikael at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |mikael at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #17 from Mikael Morin <mikael at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Jerry DeLisle from comment #16)
> Is anyone working on this one?
Not before your comment. ;-)
Using Tobias' analysis in comment #14, there is an "obvious" fix, augmenting
the reference count of the symbols present in the vector (untested):
Index: symbol.c
===================================================================
--- symbol.c (révision 220514)
+++ symbol.c (copie de travail)
@@ -3634,17 +3634,25 @@ do_traverse_symtree (gfc_symtree *st, void (*st_fu
{
/* Clear marks. */
for (i = 0; i < nodes; i++)
- st_vec[i]->n.sym->mark = 0;
+ {
+ st_vec[i]->n.sym->mark = 0;
+ st_vec[i]->n.sym->refs++;
+ }
for (i = 0; i < nodes; i++)
- if (!st_vec[i]->n.sym->mark)
+ if (!st_vec[i]->n.sym->mark && st_vec[i]->n.sym->refs > 1)
{
(*sym_func) (st_vec[i]->n.sym);
st_vec[i]->n.sym->mark = 1;
}
+
+ for (i = 0; i < nodes; i++)
+ gfc_release_symbol (st_vec[i]->n.sym);
}
else
for (i = 0; i < nodes; i++)
(*st_func) (st_vec[i]);
+
+ free (st_vec);
}
>From gcc-bugs-return-476699-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Feb 10 15:27:16 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-476699-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 30743 invoked by alias); 10 Feb 2015 15:27:15 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 18832 invoked by uid 48); 10 Feb 2015 15:27:12 -0000
From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/64326] [5 Regression] ICE at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu in check_probability, at basic-block.h:581
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2015 15:27:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P1
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 5.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-64326-4-EABJ9agdTt@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-64326-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-64326-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-02/txt/msg01032.txt.bz2
Content-length: 128
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?idd326
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
So fixed?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 26+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/60898] [4.8/4.9/5 Regression] model compile error with gfortran 4.7 and gcc 4.9
2014-04-20 3:06 [Bug fortran/60898] New: model compile error with gfortran 4.7 and gcc 4.9 on Mac OS 10.9 shaojuncycle at gmail dot com
` (16 preceding siblings ...)
2015-02-10 15:25 ` mikael at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-02-14 15:27 ` mikael at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-02-14 15:42 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
` (6 subsequent siblings)
24 siblings, 0 replies; 26+ messages in thread
From: mikael at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-02-14 15:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60898
--- Comment #18 from Mikael Morin <mikael at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Created attachment 34756
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34756&action=edit
patch fixing comment #7
(In reply to Mikael Morin from comment #17)
> Using Tobias' analysis in comment #14, there is an "obvious" fix, augmenting
> the reference count of the symbols present in the vector (untested):
>
This is not enough.
There is some code in resolve_symbol that reassigns some this_symtree->n.sym,
and may call gfc_release_symbol. The problem being there is no check that
this_symtree->n.sym == sym, so that we may apply gfc_free_symbol to something
that remains reachable through this_symtree->n.sym.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 26+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/60898] [4.8/4.9/5 Regression] model compile error with gfortran 4.7 and gcc 4.9
2014-04-20 3:06 [Bug fortran/60898] New: model compile error with gfortran 4.7 and gcc 4.9 on Mac OS 10.9 shaojuncycle at gmail dot com
` (17 preceding siblings ...)
2015-02-14 15:27 ` mikael at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-02-14 15:42 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2015-02-14 19:00 ` mikael at gcc dot gnu.org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
24 siblings, 0 replies; 26+ messages in thread
From: dominiq at lps dot ens.fr @ 2015-02-14 15:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60898
--- Comment #19 from Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> ---
> patch fixing comment #7
Confirmed, but it doesn't fix the test in comment 2 (with the addition in
comment 10).
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 26+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/60898] [4.8/4.9/5 Regression] model compile error with gfortran 4.7 and gcc 4.9
2014-04-20 3:06 [Bug fortran/60898] New: model compile error with gfortran 4.7 and gcc 4.9 on Mac OS 10.9 shaojuncycle at gmail dot com
` (18 preceding siblings ...)
2015-02-14 15:42 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
@ 2015-02-14 19:00 ` mikael at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-02-15 10:45 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
` (4 subsequent siblings)
24 siblings, 0 replies; 26+ messages in thread
From: mikael at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-02-14 19:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60898
--- Comment #20 from Mikael Morin <mikael at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #19)
> > patch fixing comment #7
>
> Confirmed, but it doesn't fix the test in comment 2 (with the addition in
> comment 10).
Confirmed; for some reason it works with the resolve.c part alone.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 26+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/60898] [4.8/4.9/5 Regression] model compile error with gfortran 4.7 and gcc 4.9
2014-04-20 3:06 [Bug fortran/60898] New: model compile error with gfortran 4.7 and gcc 4.9 on Mac OS 10.9 shaojuncycle at gmail dot com
` (19 preceding siblings ...)
2015-02-14 19:00 ` mikael at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-02-15 10:45 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2015-02-16 14:13 ` mikael at gcc dot gnu.org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
24 siblings, 0 replies; 26+ messages in thread
From: dominiq at lps dot ens.fr @ 2015-02-15 10:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60898
--- Comment #21 from Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> ---
> patch fixing comment #7
This patch breaks bootstrap:
/bin/sh ./libtool --tag=FC --mode=compile /opt/gcc/p_build/./gcc/gfortran
-B/opt/gcc/p_build/./gcc/
-B/opt/gcc/gcc4.10p-220715p2/x86_64-apple-darwin14.1.0/bin/
-B/opt/gcc/gcc4.10p-220715p2/x86_64-apple-darwin14.1.0/lib/ -isystem
/opt/gcc/gcc4.10p-220715p2/x86_64-apple-darwin14.1.0/include -isystem
/opt/gcc/gcc4.10p-220715p2/x86_64-apple-darwin14.1.0/sys-include -L. -Wall
-L../libgfortran -c -o openacc.lo ../../../p_work/libgomp/openacc.f90
libtool: compile: /opt/gcc/p_build/./gcc/gfortran -B/opt/gcc/p_build/./gcc/
-B/opt/gcc/gcc4.10p-220715p2/x86_64-apple-darwin14.1.0/bin/
-B/opt/gcc/gcc4.10p-220715p2/x86_64-apple-darwin14.1.0/lib/ -isystem
/opt/gcc/gcc4.10p-220715p2/x86_64-apple-darwin14.1.0/include -isystem
/opt/gcc/gcc4.10p-220715p2/x86_64-apple-darwin14.1.0/sys-include -L. -Wall
-L../libgfortran -c ../../../p_work/libgomp/openacc.f90 -fno-common -o
.libs/openacc.o
f951: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault: 11
and seems to break almost all the fortran tests in the test suite (gfortran
simply updated instead of a clean bootstrap).
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 26+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/60898] [4.8/4.9/5 Regression] model compile error with gfortran 4.7 and gcc 4.9
2014-04-20 3:06 [Bug fortran/60898] New: model compile error with gfortran 4.7 and gcc 4.9 on Mac OS 10.9 shaojuncycle at gmail dot com
` (20 preceding siblings ...)
2015-02-15 10:45 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
@ 2015-02-16 14:13 ` mikael at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-03-08 11:53 ` mikael at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
24 siblings, 0 replies; 26+ messages in thread
From: mikael at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-02-16 14:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60898
Mikael Morin <mikael at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords| |patch
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |mikael at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #22 from Mikael Morin <mikael at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
patch posted at:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-02/msg00917.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 26+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/60898] [4.8/4.9/5 Regression] model compile error with gfortran 4.7 and gcc 4.9
2014-04-20 3:06 [Bug fortran/60898] New: model compile error with gfortran 4.7 and gcc 4.9 on Mac OS 10.9 shaojuncycle at gmail dot com
` (21 preceding siblings ...)
2015-02-16 14:13 ` mikael at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-03-08 11:53 ` mikael at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-03-12 16:09 ` mikael at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-03-12 17:59 ` mikael at gcc dot gnu.org
24 siblings, 0 replies; 26+ messages in thread
From: mikael at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-03-08 11:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60898
--- Comment #23 from Mikael Morin <mikael at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Author: mikael
Date: Sun Mar 8 11:52:51 2015
New Revision: 221262
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221262&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR fortran/60898
fortran/
* resolve.c (resolve_symbol): Check that the symbol found by
name lookup really is the current symbol being resolved.
testsuite/
* gfortran.dg/entry_20.f90: New.
Added:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/entry_20.f90
Modified:
trunk/gcc/fortran/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/fortran/resolve.c
trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 26+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/60898] [4.8/4.9/5 Regression] model compile error with gfortran 4.7 and gcc 4.9
2014-04-20 3:06 [Bug fortran/60898] New: model compile error with gfortran 4.7 and gcc 4.9 on Mac OS 10.9 shaojuncycle at gmail dot com
` (22 preceding siblings ...)
2015-03-08 11:53 ` mikael at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-03-12 16:09 ` mikael at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-03-12 17:59 ` mikael at gcc dot gnu.org
24 siblings, 0 replies; 26+ messages in thread
From: mikael at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-03-12 16:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60898
--- Comment #24 from Mikael Morin <mikael at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Author: mikael
Date: Thu Mar 12 16:08:48 2015
New Revision: 221395
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221395&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR fortran/60898
fortran/
* resolve.c (resolve_symbol): Check that the symbol found by
name lookup really is the current symbol being resolved.
testsuite/
* gfortran.dg/entry_20.f90: New.
Added:
branches/gcc-4_9-branch/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/entry_20.f90
Modified:
branches/gcc-4_9-branch/gcc/fortran/ChangeLog
branches/gcc-4_9-branch/gcc/fortran/resolve.c
branches/gcc-4_9-branch/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 26+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/60898] [4.8/4.9/5 Regression] model compile error with gfortran 4.7 and gcc 4.9
2014-04-20 3:06 [Bug fortran/60898] New: model compile error with gfortran 4.7 and gcc 4.9 on Mac OS 10.9 shaojuncycle at gmail dot com
` (23 preceding siblings ...)
2015-03-12 16:09 ` mikael at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-03-12 17:59 ` mikael at gcc dot gnu.org
24 siblings, 0 replies; 26+ messages in thread
From: mikael at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-03-12 17:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60898
Mikael Morin <mikael at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #26 from Mikael Morin <mikael at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Fixed for 4.8.5, 4.9.3, 5.0.
Thanks for the bug report.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 26+ messages in thread