From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18530 invoked by alias); 23 Apr 2014 01:49:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 16101 invoked by uid 55); 23 Apr 2014 01:49:08 -0000 From: "shaojuncycle at gmail dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug fortran/60898] model compile error with gfortran 4.7 and gcc 4.9 on Mac OS 10.9 Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2014 01:49:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: shaojuncycle at gmail dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: WAITING X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2014-04/txt/msg01649.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60898 --- Comment #2 from cycle --- Thank you for you reply. The code file plib8b.f90 is in the attachment. 2014-04-21 21:02 GMT+08:00 dominiq at lps dot ens.fr < gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60898 > > Dominique d'Humieres changed: > > What |Removed |Added > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING > Last reconfirmed| |2014-04-21 > Ever confirmed|0 |1 > > --- Comment #1 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > Did you > See for instructions. > ? > > Apparently not. You have to provide the code for plib8b.f90 (along with > files > for needed modules and includes). Note that it will help if you can reduce > the > code. > > -- > You are receiving this mail because: > You reported the bug. >