From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-450597-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 15014 invoked by alias); 5 May 2014 15:25:32 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 14962 invoked by uid 48); 5 May 2014 15:25:29 -0000
From: "tgard at opentext dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug bootstrap/60984] [4.9 Regression] AIX: gcc-4.9.0 bootstrap fails in stage-2
Date: Mon, 05 May 2014 15:25:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: bootstrap
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.9.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: build, ice-on-valid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: blocker
X-Bugzilla-Who: tgard at opentext dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P1
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.9.1
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-60984-4-iI1j8HsxRm@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-60984-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-60984-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2014-05/txt/msg00289.txt.bz2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D60984

--- Comment #14 from Torbj=C3=B6rn Gard <tgard at opentext dot com> ---
It did not make any difference - but the build was really much faster! Than=
ks
for the info on using bash.
>>From gcc-bugs-return-450598-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Mon May 05 15:41:24 2014
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-450598-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 28538 invoked by alias); 5 May 2014 15:41:23 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 28481 invoked by uid 48); 5 May 2014 15:41:20 -0000
From: "jason at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug ipa/60965] [4.10 Regression] IPA: Devirtualization versus placement new
Date: Mon, 05 May 2014 15:41:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: ipa
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.10.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: jason at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.10.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-60965-4-EkJP45uBu4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-60965-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-60965-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2014-05/txt/msg00290.txt.bz2
Content-length: 499

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60965

--- Comment #14 from Jason Merrill <jason at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Andrew Haley from comment #11)
> (In reply to Jason Merrill from comment #9)
> > As far as I know people always use char arrays for placement new anyway; at
> > least all the examples I've ever seen do.
> 
> I'm not really sure how, given that objects must be aligned.

Either with an alignment attribute or by wrapping the array in a class like
std::aligned_storage.