* [Bug c++/60994] gcc does not recognize hidden/shadowed enumeration as valid nested-name-specifier
2014-04-29 7:00 [Bug c++/60994] New: gcc does not recognize hidden/shadowed enumeration as valid nested-name-specifier momchil.velikov at gmail dot com
@ 2014-04-29 7:07 ` trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-04-29 7:56 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
` (9 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: trippels at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-04-29 7:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60994
Markus Trippelsdorf <trippels at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC| |trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |INVALID
--- Comment #1 from Markus Trippelsdorf <trippels at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Implicit enum to int conversion is not provided for a scoped enumeration.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/60994] gcc does not recognize hidden/shadowed enumeration as valid nested-name-specifier
2014-04-29 7:00 [Bug c++/60994] New: gcc does not recognize hidden/shadowed enumeration as valid nested-name-specifier momchil.velikov at gmail dot com
2014-04-29 7:07 ` [Bug c++/60994] " trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2014-04-29 7:56 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-04-29 9:59 ` momchil.velikov at gmail dot com
` (8 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: redi at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-04-29 7:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60994
Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords| |rejects-valid
Status|RESOLVED |NEW
Last reconfirmed| |2014-04-29
Resolution|INVALID |---
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Momchil Velikov from comment #0)
> According to the C++11 Standard, [basic.lookup.qual] #1
>
> "If a :: scope resolution operator in a nested-name-specifier is not
> preceded by a decltype-specifier, lookup of the name preceding that ::
> considers only namespaces, types, and templates whose specializations are
> types."
Confirmed. C++03 said "During the lookup for a name preceding the :: scope
resolution operator, object, function, and enumerator names are ignored."
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/60994] gcc does not recognize hidden/shadowed enumeration as valid nested-name-specifier
2014-04-29 7:00 [Bug c++/60994] New: gcc does not recognize hidden/shadowed enumeration as valid nested-name-specifier momchil.velikov at gmail dot com
2014-04-29 7:07 ` [Bug c++/60994] " trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-04-29 7:56 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2014-04-29 9:59 ` momchil.velikov at gmail dot com
2014-08-28 19:02 ` aaw at gcc dot gnu.org
` (7 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: momchil.velikov at gmail dot com @ 2014-04-29 9:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60994
--- Comment #5 from Momchil Velikov <momchil.velikov at gmail dot com> ---
Proposed fix: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-04/msg01938.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/60994] gcc does not recognize hidden/shadowed enumeration as valid nested-name-specifier
2014-04-29 7:00 [Bug c++/60994] New: gcc does not recognize hidden/shadowed enumeration as valid nested-name-specifier momchil.velikov at gmail dot com
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2014-04-29 9:59 ` momchil.velikov at gmail dot com
@ 2014-08-28 19:02 ` aaw at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-02-12 13:49 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
` (6 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: aaw at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-08-28 19:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60994
Ollie Wild <aaw at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |potswa at mac dot com
--- Comment #6 from Ollie Wild <aaw at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
*** Bug 61492 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/60994] gcc does not recognize hidden/shadowed enumeration as valid nested-name-specifier
2014-04-29 7:00 [Bug c++/60994] New: gcc does not recognize hidden/shadowed enumeration as valid nested-name-specifier momchil.velikov at gmail dot com
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2014-08-28 19:02 ` aaw at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-02-12 13:49 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-02-12 13:53 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: redi at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-02-12 13:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60994
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Another example, with a function template:
struct s
{
static int i;
};
template <typename T>
int s()
{
return s::i;
}
p.cc: In function ‘int s()’:
p.cc:9:10: error: ‘s’ is not a class, namespace, or enumeration
return s::i;
^
Clang and EDG accept it.
>From gcc-bugs-return-477030-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Feb 12 13:49:35 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-477030-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 7818 invoked by alias); 12 Feb 2015 13:49:34 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 7723 invoked by uid 48); 12 Feb 2015 13:49:31 -0000
From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug lto/65012] [5 Regression] systemd fails to build at least on ppc64el, powerpc, arm-inux-gnueabihf and aarch64 with -flto (ICE)
Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2015 13:49:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: lto
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: WAITING
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 5.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status cf_reconfirmed_on cc everconfirmed
Message-ID: <bug-65012-4-B936rJUGP7@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-65012-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-65012-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-02/txt/msg01363.txt.bz2
Content-length: 478
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?ide012
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed| |2015-02-12
CC| |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/60994] gcc does not recognize hidden/shadowed enumeration as valid nested-name-specifier
2014-04-29 7:00 [Bug c++/60994] New: gcc does not recognize hidden/shadowed enumeration as valid nested-name-specifier momchil.velikov at gmail dot com
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2015-02-12 13:49 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-02-12 13:53 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-02-12 14:28 ` momchil.velikov at gmail dot com
` (4 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-02-12 13:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60994
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Have you pinged your patch? If a patch isn't reviewed within a week or two,
you should ping it on gcc-patches.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/60994] gcc does not recognize hidden/shadowed enumeration as valid nested-name-specifier
2014-04-29 7:00 [Bug c++/60994] New: gcc does not recognize hidden/shadowed enumeration as valid nested-name-specifier momchil.velikov at gmail dot com
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2015-02-12 13:53 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-02-12 14:28 ` momchil.velikov at gmail dot com
2015-04-14 15:30 ` jason at gcc dot gnu.org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: momchil.velikov at gmail dot com @ 2015-02-12 14:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60994
--- Comment #9 from Momchil Velikov <momchil.velikov at gmail dot com> ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-05/msg00659.html(In reply to Jakub
Jelinek from comment #8)
> Have you pinged your patch? If a patch isn't reviewed within a week or two,
> you should ping it on gcc-patches.
Yep, I did and got feedback.
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-05/msg00659.html
Unfortunately, I'm kinda busy with other things right now ...
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/60994] gcc does not recognize hidden/shadowed enumeration as valid nested-name-specifier
2014-04-29 7:00 [Bug c++/60994] New: gcc does not recognize hidden/shadowed enumeration as valid nested-name-specifier momchil.velikov at gmail dot com
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2015-02-12 14:28 ` momchil.velikov at gmail dot com
@ 2015-04-14 15:30 ` jason at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-08-04 21:03 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: jason at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-04-14 15:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60994
--- Comment #10 from Jason Merrill <jason at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Author: jason
Date: Tue Apr 14 15:29:21 2015
New Revision: 222094
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=222094&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/60994
* parser.c (cp_parser_class_name): Add enum_ok parameter.
(cp_parser_qualifying_entity): Use it instead of cp_parser_type_name.
(cp_parser_diagnose_invalid_type_name): Don't assume a template is
a class template.
Added:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/scoped_enum3.C
trunk/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/scoped_enum4.C
Modified:
trunk/gcc/cp/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/cp/parser.c
trunk/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp1y/var-templ23.C
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/60994] gcc does not recognize hidden/shadowed enumeration as valid nested-name-specifier
2014-04-29 7:00 [Bug c++/60994] New: gcc does not recognize hidden/shadowed enumeration as valid nested-name-specifier momchil.velikov at gmail dot com
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2015-04-14 15:30 ` jason at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-08-04 21:03 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-08-04 21:04 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-12-02 11:16 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-08-04 21:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60994
Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|--- |6.0
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/60994] gcc does not recognize hidden/shadowed enumeration as valid nested-name-specifier
2014-04-29 7:00 [Bug c++/60994] New: gcc does not recognize hidden/shadowed enumeration as valid nested-name-specifier momchil.velikov at gmail dot com
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2021-08-04 21:03 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-08-04 21:04 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-12-02 11:16 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-08-04 21:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60994
Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |kariya_mitsuru at hotmail dot com
--- Comment #18 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
*** Bug 59921 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/60994] gcc does not recognize hidden/shadowed enumeration as valid nested-name-specifier
2014-04-29 7:00 [Bug c++/60994] New: gcc does not recognize hidden/shadowed enumeration as valid nested-name-specifier momchil.velikov at gmail dot com
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
2021-08-04 21:04 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2023-12-02 11:16 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2023-12-02 11:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60994
--- Comment #19 from GCC Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The master branch has been updated by Roger Sayle <sayle@gcc.gnu.org>:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:193ef02a7f4f3e5349ad9cf8d3d4df466a99b677
commit r14-6075-g193ef02a7f4f3e5349ad9cf8d3d4df466a99b677
Author: Roger Sayle <roger@nextmovesoftware.com>
Date: Sat Dec 2 11:15:14 2023 +0000
RISC-V: Improve style to work around PR 60994 in host compiler.
This simple patch allows me to build a cross-compiler to riscv using
older versions of RedHat's system compiler. The issue is PR c++/60994
where g++ doesn't like the same name (demand_flags) to be used by both
a variable and a (enumeration) type, which is also undesirable from a
(GNU) coding style perspective. One solution is to rename the type
to demand_flags_t, but a less invasive change is to simply use another
identifier for the problematic local variable, renaming demand_flags
to dflags.
2023-12-02 Roger Sayle <roger@nextmovesoftware.com>
gcc/ChangeLog
* config/riscv/riscv-vsetvl.cc (csetvl_info::parse_insn): Rename
local variable from demand_flags to dflags, to avoid conflicting
with (enumeration) type of the same name.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread