* [Bug debug/61014] [4.7/4.8/4.9/4.10 Regression] gdb can't find symbol of derived data type array in nested subroutine
2014-04-30 11:54 [Bug fortran/61014] New: [4.6/4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] gdb can't find symbol of derived data type array in nested subroutine sven.buijssen at math dot uni-dortmund.de
@ 2014-04-30 12:20 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-04-30 12:20 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (16 subsequent siblings)
17 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-04-30 12:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61014
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed| |2014-04-30
Component|fortran |debug
Known to work| |4.5.4
Summary|[4.6/4.7/4.8/4.9 |[4.7/4.8/4.9/4.10
|Regression] gdb can't find |Regression] gdb can't find
|symbol of derived data type |symbol of derived data type
|array in nested subroutine |array in nested subroutine
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Known to fail| |4.8.2
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
I get (gdb 7.7):
Breakpoint 1, module::foo (bar=...) at module.f90:10
10 call subfoo()
(gdb) p bar
$1 = (( -1 ))
(gdb) p bar(1)%i
$2 = -1
(gdb) s
module::subfoo () at module.f90:14
14 bar(1)%i = 1
(gdb) p bar(1)%i
value being subranged must be in memory
(gdb) p bar
$3 = <optimized out>
seems that nested function lowering and debugging don't play well together.
Confirmed that it works well with 4.5.x.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* [Bug debug/61014] [4.7/4.8/4.9/4.10 Regression] gdb can't find symbol of derived data type array in nested subroutine
2014-04-30 11:54 [Bug fortran/61014] New: [4.6/4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] gdb can't find symbol of derived data type array in nested subroutine sven.buijssen at math dot uni-dortmund.de
2014-04-30 12:20 ` [Bug debug/61014] [4.7/4.8/4.9/4.10 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2014-04-30 12:20 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-04-30 13:17 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
` (15 subsequent siblings)
17 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-04-30 12:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61014
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* [Bug debug/61014] [4.7/4.8/4.9/4.10 Regression] gdb can't find symbol of derived data type array in nested subroutine
2014-04-30 11:54 [Bug fortran/61014] New: [4.6/4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] gdb can't find symbol of derived data type array in nested subroutine sven.buijssen at math dot uni-dortmund.de
2014-04-30 12:20 ` [Bug debug/61014] [4.7/4.8/4.9/4.10 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-04-30 12:20 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2014-04-30 13:17 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-04-30 13:24 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
` (14 subsequent siblings)
17 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: burnus at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-04-30 13:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61014
Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Sven Buijssen from comment #0)
> (I am not exactly sure whether gfortran or gdb are to blame for this issue,
> but I tend towards the former.)
> $ gfortran -O0 -g -fno-inline -Wall -Wextra -fno-lto debug.f90 module.o
> $ gdb --version
> $ ifort -O0 -g -Warn all debug.o module.o
> $ idbc a.out
As you also have "idb" at hand: You could cross check whether the GCC/gfortran
binary works with idbc - and the ifort binary with gdb. They both use the same
debugging format (which can differ slightly between versions).
> subroutine foo(bar)
> type(myint), dimension(:) :: bar
This line implies that gfortran uses array descriptors; those are not yet
supported in GDB - except that some vendor's versions (e.g. Red Hat/Fedora and
(open)SUSE have some basic support.
There is an on-going effort to add arrays-descriptor support to GDB; the first
step, the support of C99's varying-length arrays has been added a few weeks ago
to the GDB trunk. The Fortran support is supposed to come next, but it still
will take a couple of weeks. See also:
https://github.com/intel-gdb/vla/branches - but the Fortran branch there is a
bit outdated.
However, ...
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> I get (gdb 7.7):
...
> seems that nested function lowering and debugging don't play well together.
> Confirmed that it works well with 4.5.x.
The combination that it works with 4.5 and that also a SUSE-build of gdb shows
the problem, makes it more likely that the problem lies elsewhere.
(It might be still a combination of changed dwarf generation in GCC and
incomplete GDB support.)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* [Bug debug/61014] [4.7/4.8/4.9/4.10 Regression] gdb can't find symbol of derived data type array in nested subroutine
2014-04-30 11:54 [Bug fortran/61014] New: [4.6/4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] gdb can't find symbol of derived data type array in nested subroutine sven.buijssen at math dot uni-dortmund.de
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2014-04-30 13:17 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2014-04-30 13:24 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-04-30 13:44 ` sven.buijssen at math dot uni-dortmund.de
` (13 subsequent siblings)
17 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: burnus at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-04-30 13:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61014
--- Comment #3 from Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Tobias Burnus from comment #2)
> As you also have "idb" at hand
I now did it myself with gcc 4.10 and idbc 13.0. (I don't have ifort.)
Result:
In line 10, I get:
(idb) p bar
$3 = {i = -1}
but in line 14, I get:
`module::foo::subfoo () at /dev/shm/h4j.f90:14
14 bar(1)%i = 1
(idb) p bar
Info: symbol bar is defined but not allocated (optimized away)
Thus, as Richard wrote:
> seems that nested function lowering and debugging don't play well together.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* [Bug debug/61014] [4.7/4.8/4.9/4.10 Regression] gdb can't find symbol of derived data type array in nested subroutine
2014-04-30 11:54 [Bug fortran/61014] New: [4.6/4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] gdb can't find symbol of derived data type array in nested subroutine sven.buijssen at math dot uni-dortmund.de
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2014-04-30 13:24 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2014-04-30 13:44 ` sven.buijssen at math dot uni-dortmund.de
2014-05-02 19:26 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
` (12 subsequent siblings)
17 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: sven.buijssen at math dot uni-dortmund.de @ 2014-04-30 13:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61014
--- Comment #4 from Sven Buijssen <sven.buijssen at math dot uni-dortmund.de> ---
I tried gdb 7.7 with Intel Fortran 10.1.023, 11.1.080, 12.1.7.367, 13.0.1.117,
13.1.3.192 and 14.0.2.144, respectively and get wrong results at breakpoint 1
(value of bar(1)%i = 0) and either "no symbol" or "cannot access memory" at
breakpoint 2:
ifort 10.1.023:
Breakpoint 1, MODULE::foo (bar=..., bar=...) at module.f90:10
10 call subfoo()
(gdb) p bar
$1 = (( 0 ))
(gdb) c
Continuing.
Breakpoint 2, 0x0000000000402af8 in modulefoo_mp_subfoo_ ()
(gdb) p bar
No symbol "bar" in current context.
#
ifort 11.1.080 & 12.1.7.367 & 13.0.1.117 & 13.1.3.192:
Breakpoint 1, MODULE::foo (bar=...) at module.f90:10
10 call subfoo()
(gdb) p bar
$1 = (( 0 ))
(gdb) c
Continuing.
Breakpoint 2, MODULE::subfoo () at module.f90:14
14 bar(1)%i = 1
(gdb) p bar
$2 = (( 0 ))
(gdb) p bar(1)%i
Cannot access memory at address 0x4
#
ifort 14.0.2.144:
Breakpoint 1, MODULE::foo (bar=...) at module.f90:10
10 call subfoo()
(gdb) p bar
$1 = (( 0 ))
(gdb) c
Continuing.
Breakpoint 2, modulefoo_mp_subfoo_ () at module.f90:14
14 bar(1)%i = 1
(gdb) p bar
No symbol "bar" in current context.
(gdb) p bar(1)%i
No symbol "bar" in current context.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* [Bug debug/61014] [4.7/4.8/4.9/4.10 Regression] gdb can't find symbol of derived data type array in nested subroutine
2014-04-30 11:54 [Bug fortran/61014] New: [4.6/4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] gdb can't find symbol of derived data type array in nested subroutine sven.buijssen at math dot uni-dortmund.de
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2014-04-30 13:44 ` sven.buijssen at math dot uni-dortmund.de
@ 2014-05-02 19:26 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-05-07 17:38 ` tromey at gcc dot gnu.org
` (11 subsequent siblings)
17 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: burnus at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-05-02 19:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61014
--- Comment #6 from Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
For crossref, that was the patch r167201:
"[patch] Enable Ada bootstrap with LTO"
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-11/msg02644.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* [Bug debug/61014] [4.7/4.8/4.9/4.10 Regression] gdb can't find symbol of derived data type array in nested subroutine
2014-04-30 11:54 [Bug fortran/61014] New: [4.6/4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] gdb can't find symbol of derived data type array in nested subroutine sven.buijssen at math dot uni-dortmund.de
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2014-05-02 19:26 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2014-05-07 17:38 ` tromey at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-06-12 13:49 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (10 subsequent siblings)
17 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: tromey at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-05-07 17:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61014
Tom Tromey <tromey at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |tromey at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #7 from Tom Tromey <tromey at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
> seems that nested function lowering and debugging don't play well together.
Note that sometimes nested functions appear to work in gdb -- but
actually they do not, and if you get the right answer it is largely
just luck. gdb ignores DW_AT_static_link.
My attempt to make gdb understand this failed due to gcc bug #53927.
In this particular bug I am going to guess that the problem is the
use of non-constant array bounds in the DWARF, which gdb still
doesn't understand. There's an ongoing project to fix this.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* [Bug debug/61014] [4.7/4.8/4.9/4.10 Regression] gdb can't find symbol of derived data type array in nested subroutine
2014-04-30 11:54 [Bug fortran/61014] New: [4.6/4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] gdb can't find symbol of derived data type array in nested subroutine sven.buijssen at math dot uni-dortmund.de
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2014-05-07 17:38 ` tromey at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2014-06-12 13:49 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-12-01 12:00 ` [Bug debug/61014] [4.8/4.9/5 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (9 subsequent siblings)
17 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-06-12 13:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61014
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|4.7.4 |4.8.4
--- Comment #8 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The 4.7 branch is being closed, moving target milestone to 4.8.4.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* [Bug debug/61014] [4.8/4.9/5 Regression] gdb can't find symbol of derived data type array in nested subroutine
2014-04-30 11:54 [Bug fortran/61014] New: [4.6/4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] gdb can't find symbol of derived data type array in nested subroutine sven.buijssen at math dot uni-dortmund.de
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2014-06-12 13:49 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2014-12-01 12:00 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-12-19 13:44 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (8 subsequent siblings)
17 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-12-01 12:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61014
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Priority|P3 |P4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* [Bug debug/61014] [4.8/4.9/5 Regression] gdb can't find symbol of derived data type array in nested subroutine
2014-04-30 11:54 [Bug fortran/61014] New: [4.6/4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] gdb can't find symbol of derived data type array in nested subroutine sven.buijssen at math dot uni-dortmund.de
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2014-12-01 12:00 ` [Bug debug/61014] [4.8/4.9/5 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2014-12-19 13:44 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-06-23 8:28 ` [Bug debug/61014] [4.8/4.9/5/6 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (7 subsequent siblings)
17 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-12-19 13:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61014
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|4.8.4 |4.8.5
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
GCC 4.8.4 has been released.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* [Bug debug/61014] [4.8/4.9/5/6 Regression] gdb can't find symbol of derived data type array in nested subroutine
2014-04-30 11:54 [Bug fortran/61014] New: [4.6/4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] gdb can't find symbol of derived data type array in nested subroutine sven.buijssen at math dot uni-dortmund.de
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
2014-12-19 13:44 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-06-23 8:28 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-06-26 20:19 ` [Bug debug/61014] [4.9/5/6 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (6 subsequent siblings)
17 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-06-23 8:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61014
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|4.8.5 |4.9.3
--- Comment #10 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The gcc-4_8-branch is being closed, re-targeting regressions to 4.9.3.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* [Bug debug/61014] [4.9/5/6 Regression] gdb can't find symbol of derived data type array in nested subroutine
2014-04-30 11:54 [Bug fortran/61014] New: [4.6/4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] gdb can't find symbol of derived data type array in nested subroutine sven.buijssen at math dot uni-dortmund.de
` (10 preceding siblings ...)
2015-06-23 8:28 ` [Bug debug/61014] [4.8/4.9/5/6 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-06-26 20:19 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-06-26 20:39 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
17 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-06-26 20:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61014
--- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
GCC 4.9.3 has been released.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* [Bug debug/61014] [4.9/5/6 Regression] gdb can't find symbol of derived data type array in nested subroutine
2014-04-30 11:54 [Bug fortran/61014] New: [4.6/4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] gdb can't find symbol of derived data type array in nested subroutine sven.buijssen at math dot uni-dortmund.de
` (11 preceding siblings ...)
2015-06-26 20:19 ` [Bug debug/61014] [4.9/5/6 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-06-26 20:39 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-05-14 9:47 ` [Bug debug/61014] [9/10/11/12 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
17 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-06-26 20:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61014
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|4.9.3 |4.9.4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* [Bug debug/61014] [9/10/11/12 Regression] gdb can't find symbol of derived data type array in nested subroutine
2014-04-30 11:54 [Bug fortran/61014] New: [4.6/4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] gdb can't find symbol of derived data type array in nested subroutine sven.buijssen at math dot uni-dortmund.de
` (12 preceding siblings ...)
2015-06-26 20:39 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-05-14 9:47 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-06-01 8:06 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
17 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-05-14 9:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61014
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|8.5 |9.4
--- Comment #16 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
GCC 8 branch is being closed.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* [Bug debug/61014] [9/10/11/12 Regression] gdb can't find symbol of derived data type array in nested subroutine
2014-04-30 11:54 [Bug fortran/61014] New: [4.6/4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] gdb can't find symbol of derived data type array in nested subroutine sven.buijssen at math dot uni-dortmund.de
` (13 preceding siblings ...)
2021-05-14 9:47 ` [Bug debug/61014] [9/10/11/12 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-06-01 8:06 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-05-27 9:35 ` [Bug debug/61014] [10/11/12/13 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
17 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-06-01 8:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61014
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|9.4 |9.5
--- Comment #17 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
GCC 9.4 is being released, retargeting bugs to GCC 9.5.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* [Bug debug/61014] [10/11/12/13 Regression] gdb can't find symbol of derived data type array in nested subroutine
2014-04-30 11:54 [Bug fortran/61014] New: [4.6/4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] gdb can't find symbol of derived data type array in nested subroutine sven.buijssen at math dot uni-dortmund.de
` (14 preceding siblings ...)
2021-06-01 8:06 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2022-05-27 9:35 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-06-28 10:30 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-07-07 10:30 ` [Bug debug/61014] [11/12/13/14 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
17 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-05-27 9:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61014
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|9.5 |10.4
--- Comment #18 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
GCC 9 branch is being closed
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* [Bug debug/61014] [10/11/12/13 Regression] gdb can't find symbol of derived data type array in nested subroutine
2014-04-30 11:54 [Bug fortran/61014] New: [4.6/4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] gdb can't find symbol of derived data type array in nested subroutine sven.buijssen at math dot uni-dortmund.de
` (15 preceding siblings ...)
2022-05-27 9:35 ` [Bug debug/61014] [10/11/12/13 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2022-06-28 10:30 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-07-07 10:30 ` [Bug debug/61014] [11/12/13/14 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
17 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-06-28 10:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61014
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|10.4 |10.5
--- Comment #19 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
GCC 10.4 is being released, retargeting bugs to GCC 10.5.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* [Bug debug/61014] [11/12/13/14 Regression] gdb can't find symbol of derived data type array in nested subroutine
2014-04-30 11:54 [Bug fortran/61014] New: [4.6/4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] gdb can't find symbol of derived data type array in nested subroutine sven.buijssen at math dot uni-dortmund.de
` (16 preceding siblings ...)
2022-06-28 10:30 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2023-07-07 10:30 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
17 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2023-07-07 10:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61014
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|10.5 |11.5
--- Comment #20 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
GCC 10 branch is being closed.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread