[Bug c++/61018] [5 Regression] -Wvarargs does not print warning for member functions

["manu at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61018

Manuel López-Ibáñez <manu at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |manu at gcc dot gnu.org
   Target Milestone|---                         |5.0
            Summary|-Wvarargs does not print    |[5 Regression] -Wvarargs
                   |warning for member          |does not print warning for
                   |functions                   |member functions

--- Comment #1 from Manuel López-Ibáñez <manu at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
It seems a regression, because GCC 4.4.5 did warn.
>From gcc-bugs-return-466275-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Mon Nov 10 16:55:43 2014
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-466275-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 16218 invoked by alias); 10 Nov 2014 16:55:43 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 16154 invoked by uid 48); 10 Nov 2014 16:55:39 -0000
From: "howarth at bromo dot med.uc.edu" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/61407] Build errors on latest OS X 10.10 Yosemite with Xcode 6 on GCC 4.8.3
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2014 16:55:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: howarth at bromo dot med.uc.edu
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-61407-4-bnzl140H5N@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-61407-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-61407-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2014-11/txt/msg00747.txt.bz2
Content-length: 1301

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?ida407

howarth at bromo dot med.uc.edu changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |howarth at bromo dot med.uc.edu

--- Comment #46 from howarth at bromo dot med.uc.edu ---
(In reply to Francois-Xavier Coudert from comment #45)
> (In reply to Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia from comment #42)
> > The committed patch is incorrect.  It makes an invalid assumption which
> > breaks the usage of deployment targets such as 10.9.3.
>
> All Apple doc I can find has deployment targets of the form 10.x or 10.x.0
> (where x is integer, but not only one digit).

If Jeremy really disagreed on that change, he hasn't acted on it in the gcc49
MacPorts packaging that he maintains (which still uses the original proposed
patch from https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-08/msg02428.html). FYI, as
far as llvm-gcc 4.2.1 is concerned, in my fink legacy package for Apple's
llvm-gcc 4.2.1, I used a back port of our patch,
http://fink.cvs.sourceforge.net/viewvc/fink/dists/10.7/stable/main/finkinfo/languages/llvm-gcc42-yosemite.patch.
Neither gcc 4.9.2 nor the patched llvm-gcc 4.2.1 has shown any problems on OS X
10.9.5.