public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "rguenther at suse dot de" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/61034] Optimizing takes too many passes
Date: Mon, 05 May 2014 12:19:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-61034-4-OSCwy6ZgSG@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-61034-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61034
--- Comment #6 from rguenther at suse dot de <rguenther at suse dot de> ---
On Mon, 5 May 2014, glisse at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61034
>
> --- Comment #5 from Marc Glisse <glisse at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
> (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #4)
> > you might want to check whether that improves things and point me to stuff
> > that is left (FRE related).
>
> The fre2 dump looks much nicer (the .optimized dump is a bit surprising, I
> would need more time to look at it). It is not sufficient, but it clearly
> helps.
>
> In the fre2 dump, I still see (skipping many lines, I may have skipped some
> essential ones):
>
> D.2325.o = _4;
> D.2325.o = _101;
> _105 = _4;
> __builtin_free (_105);
> _96 = D.2325.o;
>
> (instead of _96 = _101)
that's a conditional assignment AFAICS
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-05-05 12:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-05-02 10:52 [Bug tree-optimization/61034] New: " glisse at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-05-05 10:25 ` [Bug tree-optimization/61034] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-05-05 10:33 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-05-05 10:48 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-05-05 11:56 ` glisse at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-05-05 12:19 ` rguenther at suse dot de [this message]
2014-05-05 13:41 ` glisse at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-05-07 11:08 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-05-07 11:50 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-05-07 14:19 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-05-07 15:14 ` glisse at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-05-08 10:00 ` rguenther at suse dot de
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bug-61034-4-OSCwy6ZgSG@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
--to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).