From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17730 invoked by alias); 13 Jan 2015 08:37:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 17678 invoked by uid 48); 13 Jan 2015 08:37:13 -0000 From: "zsojka at seznam dot cz" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/61047] [4.9/5 Regression] wrong code at -O1 on x86_64-linux Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2015 08:37:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: rtl-optimization X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: zsojka at seznam dot cz X-Bugzilla-Status: SUSPENDED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.9.3 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2015-01/txt/msg00915.txt.bz2 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61047 --- Comment #15 from Zdenek Sojka --- (In reply to Eric Botcazou from comment #9) > Not worth fixing until we have a bug report for real-life software. So do you prefer leaving the bug in until it hits a real-life software? Is this a common opinion among the GCC dev team, or does it apply only to this particular case?