From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12306 invoked by alias); 5 May 2014 11:28:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 12274 invoked by uid 48); 5 May 2014 11:28:56 -0000 From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c/61063] Improve -fstack-protector-all Date: Mon, 05 May 2014 11:28:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.3.4 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status cc resolution Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2014-05/txt/msg00260.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61063 Jakub Jelinek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC| |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org Resolution|--- |INVALID --- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek --- Just use -fsanitize=address in GCC 4.8.0 or later, or valgrind, -fstack-protector is not meant to have such a performance hit.