public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Ulrich.Windl at rz dot uni-regensburg.de" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c/61063] New: Improve -fstack-protector-all
Date: Mon, 05 May 2014 11:20:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-61063-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61063

            Bug ID: 61063
           Summary: Improve -fstack-protector-all
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.3.4
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: enhancement
          Priority: P3
         Component: c
          Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
          Reporter: Ulrich.Windl at rz dot uni-regensburg.de

I had made a programming error that I could not find with
-fstack-protector-all, but I think it should have helped:
My bug was related to pthread_join() when the thread return parameter received
a pointer to an integer (as the thread actually returns an integer).
Unfortunately on x86_64 sizeof(int) != sizeof(void *), so my program overwrote
the stack.
Interestingly with -O0 things seemed to work, but with -O2 things went grazy.
When the program eventually caused a SIGSEGV the stack was completely unusable
(program crashed on return).

AFAIK, stack-protect pads some magic bytes around on the stack that are checked
before return. As it didn't help much diagnosing my problem, I'd like to
suggest the following enhancements:

1) Don't add some magic bytes at one place on the stack, but add magic bytes
around _every_ variable on the stack.

2) Don't just call the integrity test for the magic bytes before return, but
every time a variable on the stack is modified.

I know it will hit performance hard, but I wasted several hours until I found
why my code broke.


             reply	other threads:[~2014-05-05 11:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-05-05 11:20 Ulrich.Windl at rz dot uni-regensburg.de [this message]
2014-05-05 11:28 ` [Bug c/61063] " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-61063-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).