public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug c++/61066] New: [4.8 Regression] Many testcase failures
@ 2014-05-05 13:33 rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-05-05 13:34 ` [Bug c++/61066] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (7 more replies)
0 siblings, 8 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-05-05 13:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61066
Bug ID: 61066
Summary: [4.8 Regression] Many testcase failures
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
Native configuration is x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
=== g++ tests ===
Running target unix/
FAIL: g++.dg/conversion/dr195.C -std=c++98 (test for warnings, line 21)
FAIL: g++.dg/conversion/dr195.C -std=c++98 (test for warnings, line 22)
FAIL: g++.dg/conversion/dr195.C -std=c++98 (test for warnings, line 25)
FAIL: g++.dg/conversion/dr195.C -std=c++98 (test for warnings, line 26)
FAIL: g++.dg/conversion/dr195.C -std=c++98 (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.dg/conversion/dr195.C -std=c++11 (test for warnings, line 21)
FAIL: g++.dg/conversion/dr195.C -std=c++11 (test for warnings, line 22)
FAIL: g++.dg/conversion/dr195.C -std=c++11 (test for warnings, line 25)
FAIL: g++.dg/conversion/dr195.C -std=c++11 (test for warnings, line 26)
FAIL: g++.dg/conversion/dr195.C -std=c++11 (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.dg/expr/cast2.C -std=c++98 (test for warnings, line 4)
FAIL: g++.dg/expr/cast2.C -std=c++98 (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.dg/expr/cast2.C -std=c++11 (test for warnings, line 4)
FAIL: g++.dg/expr/cast2.C -std=c++11 (test for excess errors)
(this was with checking enabled, but I doubt that matters)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* [Bug c++/61066] [4.8 Regression] Many testcase failures
2014-05-05 13:33 [Bug c++/61066] New: [4.8 Regression] Many testcase failures rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2014-05-05 13:34 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-05-05 13:38 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (6 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-05-05 13:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61066
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Priority|P3 |P1
Target Milestone|--- |4.8.3
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* [Bug c++/61066] [4.8 Regression] Many testcase failures
2014-05-05 13:33 [Bug c++/61066] New: [4.8 Regression] Many testcase failures rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-05-05 13:34 ` [Bug c++/61066] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2014-05-05 13:38 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-05-05 14:03 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-05-05 13:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61066
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
r209292 is ok, r210069 is broken.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* [Bug c++/61066] [4.8 Regression] Many testcase failures
2014-05-05 13:33 [Bug c++/61066] New: [4.8 Regression] Many testcase failures rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-05-05 13:34 ` [Bug c++/61066] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-05-05 13:38 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2014-05-05 14:03 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-05-05 14:05 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-05-05 14:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61066
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed| |2014-05-05
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Also see http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-regression/2014-05/msg00019.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* [Bug c++/61066] [4.8 Regression] Many testcase failures
2014-05-05 13:33 [Bug c++/61066] New: [4.8 Regression] Many testcase failures rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2014-05-05 14:03 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2014-05-05 14:05 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-05-05 14:14 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
` (3 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-05-05 14:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61066
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |daniel.gutson@tallertechnol
| |ogies.com
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Points to
2014-04-28 Daniel Gutson <daniel.gutson@tallertechnologies.com>
* typeck.c (build_reinterpret_cast_1): Pass proper argument to
warn() in pedantic.
please fix ASAP (or revert).
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* [Bug c++/61066] [4.8 Regression] Many testcase failures
2014-05-05 13:33 [Bug c++/61066] New: [4.8 Regression] Many testcase failures rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2014-05-05 14:05 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2014-05-05 14:14 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2014-05-05 16:50 ` daniel.gutson at tallertechnologies dot com
` (2 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: dominiq at lps dot ens.fr @ 2014-05-05 14:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61066
--- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> ---
> r209292 is ok, r210069 is broken.
r209870, pr60850.
The tests should be updated by replacing dg-warning with dg-error (not tested,
but obvious) or prevent the use of -pedantic-errors and use -pedantic.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* [Bug c++/61066] [4.8 Regression] Many testcase failures
2014-05-05 13:33 [Bug c++/61066] New: [4.8 Regression] Many testcase failures rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2014-05-05 14:14 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
@ 2014-05-05 16:50 ` daniel.gutson at tallertechnologies dot com
2014-05-13 16:07 ` jason at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-05-13 16:29 ` daniel.gutson at tallertechnologies dot com
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: daniel.gutson at tallertechnologies dot com @ 2014-05-05 16:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61066
--- Comment #5 from Daniel Gutson <daniel.gutson at tallertechnologies dot com> ---
It seems some tests didn't run when I tested the patch, sorry about that.
I'll try to run all the tests and update them as needed.
I will post the new patch as soon as possible.
Sorry for the inconveniences.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* [Bug c++/61066] [4.8 Regression] Many testcase failures
2014-05-05 13:33 [Bug c++/61066] New: [4.8 Regression] Many testcase failures rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2014-05-05 16:50 ` daniel.gutson at tallertechnologies dot com
@ 2014-05-13 16:07 ` jason at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-05-13 16:29 ` daniel.gutson at tallertechnologies dot com
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: jason at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-05-13 16:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61066
Jason Merrill <jason at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC| |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill <jason at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Corrected the tests.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* [Bug c++/61066] [4.8 Regression] Many testcase failures
2014-05-05 13:33 [Bug c++/61066] New: [4.8 Regression] Many testcase failures rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2014-05-13 16:07 ` jason at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2014-05-13 16:29 ` daniel.gutson at tallertechnologies dot com
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: daniel.gutson at tallertechnologies dot com @ 2014-05-13 16:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61066
--- Comment #7 from Daniel Gutson <daniel.gutson at tallertechnologies dot com> ---
Sorry my lack of time.
Thanks Jason.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2014-05-13 16:29 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2014-05-05 13:33 [Bug c++/61066] New: [4.8 Regression] Many testcase failures rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-05-05 13:34 ` [Bug c++/61066] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-05-05 13:38 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-05-05 14:03 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-05-05 14:05 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-05-05 14:14 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2014-05-05 16:50 ` daniel.gutson at tallertechnologies dot com
2014-05-13 16:07 ` jason at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-05-13 16:29 ` daniel.gutson at tallertechnologies dot com
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).