[Bug other/61091] New: [4.10 Regression] wide-int.h:1172:45: error: incomplete type ‘wi::int_traits<long long unsigned int>’ used in nested name specifier

[Bug other/61091] New: [4.10 Regression] wide-int.h:1172:45: error: incomplete type ‘wi::int_traits<long long unsigned int>’ used in nested name specifier

[danglin at gcc dot gnu.org]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61091

            Bug ID: 61091
           Summary: [4.10 Regression] wide-int.h:1172:45: error:
                    incomplete type ‘wi::int_traits<long long unsigned
                    int>’ used in nested name specifier
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.10.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: other
          Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
          Reporter: danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
              Host: hppa-unknown-linux-gnu
            Target: hppa-unknown-linux-gnu
             Build: hppa-unknown-linux-gnu

g++-4.9 -c   -g -DIN_GCC    -fno-exceptions -fno-rtti
-fasynchronous-unwind-tabl
es -W -Wall -Wno-narrowing -Wwrite-strings -Wcast-qual -Wno-format
-Wmissing-for
mat-attribute -Woverloaded-virtual -pedantic -Wno-long-long
-Wno-variadic-macros
 -Wno-overlength-strings -fno-common  -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../../gcc/gcc
-I
../../gcc/gcc/. -I../../gcc/gcc/../include -I../../gcc/gcc/../libcpp/include 
-I
../../gcc/gcc/../libdecnumber -I../../gcc/gcc/../libdecnumber/dpd
-I../libdecnum
ber -I../../gcc/gcc/../libbacktrace -DCLOOG_INT_GMP    -o loop-iv.o -MT
loop-iv.
o -MMD -MP -MF ./.deps/loop-iv.TPo ../../gcc/gcc/loop-iv.c
In file included from ../../gcc/gcc/real.h:25:0,                 from
../../gcc/gcc/rtl.h:27,
                 from ../../gcc/gcc/loop-iv.c:54:
../../gcc/gcc/wide-int.h: In instantiation of
‘fixed_wide_int_storage<N>::fixed_
wide_int_storage(const T&) [with T = long long unsigned int; int N =
160]’:../../gcc/gcc/wide-int.h:724:15:   required from
‘generic_wide_int<T>::generic_w
ide_int(const T&) [with T = long long unsigned int; storage =
fixed_wide_int_sto
rage<160>]’
../../gcc/gcc/loop-iv.c:2628:48:   required from here
../../gcc/gcc/wide-int.h:1172:45: error: incomplete type ‘wi::int_traits<long
lo
ng unsigned int>’ used in nested name specifier
   WI_BINARY_RESULT (T, FIXED_WIDE_INT (N)) *assertion ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED;
   WI_BINARY_RESULT (T, FIXED_WIDE_INT (N)) *assertion ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED;
                                             ^
../../gcc/gcc/wide-int.h:1173:47: error: incomplete type ‘wi::int_traits<long
lo
ng unsigned int>’ used in nested name specifier
   wi::copy (*this, WIDE_INT_REF_FOR (T) (x, N));
                                               ^
Makefile:1058: recipe for target 'loop-iv.o' failed
make[3]: *** [loop-iv.o] Error 1
>From gcc-bugs-return-450747-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed May 07 04:38:06 2014
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-450747-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 11229 invoked by alias); 7 May 2014 04:38:05 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 11202 invoked by uid 48); 7 May 2014 04:38:01 -0000
From: "greened at obbligato dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/61082] [x86-64 Itanium ABI] g++ uses wrong return location for class with head padding
Date: Wed, 07 May 2014 04:38:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.9.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: major
X-Bugzilla-Who: greened at obbligato dot org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-61082-4-w070zIuTDS@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-61082-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-61082-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2014-05/txt/msg00439.txt.bz2
Content-length: 388

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?ida082

--- Comment #3 from David Greene <greened at obbligato dot org> ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2)
> Y is a non-POD.

So...?

The ABI doesn't talk about POD vs. non-POD.  It talks about copy constructors
and destructors.

Can you explain what POD has to do with this and why Intel generates the return
value in (RAX, RDX)?

[Bug other/61091] [4.10 Regression] wide-int.h:1172:45: error: incomplete type ‘wi::int_traits<long long unsigned int>’ used in nested name specifier

[rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61091

Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Target Milestone|---                         |4.10.0

[Bug other/61091] [4.10 Regression] wide-int.h:1172:45: error: incomplete type ‘wi::int_traits<long long unsigned int>’ used in nested name specifier

[rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61091

rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org <rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |WAITING
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2014-05-07
                 CC|                            |rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
     Ever confirmed|0                           |1

--- Comment #1 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org <rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Should be fixed by r210149 (Richard B's patch to make HOST_WIDE_INT
64 bits wide)

[Bug other/61091] [4.10 Regression] wide-int.h:1172:45: error: incomplete type ‘wi::int_traits<long long unsigned int>’ used in nested name specifier

[dave.anglin at bell dot net]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61091

--- Comment #2 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
On 5/7/2014 6:31 AM, rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> Should be fixed by r210149 (Richard B's patch to make HOST_WIDE_INT
> 64 bits wide)
Will test tonight.

Dave

[Bug other/61091] [4.10 Regression] wide-int.h:1172:45: error: incomplete type ‘wi::int_traits<long long unsigned int>’ used in nested name specifier

[danglin at gcc dot gnu.org]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61091

John David Anglin <danglin at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|WAITING                     |RESOLVED
         Resolution|---                         |FIXED

--- Comment #3 from John David Anglin <danglin at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Fixed.