public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug sanitizer/61095] New: tsan is broken in gcc trunk, works in 4.9
@ 2014-05-07 11:16 kcc at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-05-07 12:03 ` [Bug sanitizer/61095] " kcc at gcc dot gnu.org
` (15 more replies)
0 siblings, 16 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: kcc at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-05-07 11:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61095
Bug ID: 61095
Summary: tsan is broken in gcc trunk, works in 4.9
Product: gcc
Version: 4.10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: sanitizer
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: kcc at gcc dot gnu.org
CC: dodji at gcc dot gnu.org, dvyukov at gcc dot gnu.org,
jakub at gcc dot gnu.org, kcc at gcc dot gnu.org
tsan seems to be broken in the current gcc trunk
(Tested r210145 on Linux ubuntu 12.04).
gcc 4.9.0 works fine.
There have been no recent libsanitizer merges from upstream so the problem
was likely introduced somewhere in the buildfiles, etc
% /usr/local/gcc-4.9.0/bin/g++ -g -fsanitize=thread -fPIE -pie -static-libtsan
simple_race.cc && ./a.out
==================
WARNING: ThreadSanitizer: data race (pid=31025)
...
% ../gcc-inst/bin/g++ -g -fsanitize=thread -fPIE -pie -static-libtsan
simple_race.cc && ./a.out
FATAL: ThreadSanitizer CHECK failed:
../../../../gcc/libsanitizer/tsan/tsan_rtl.cc:587 "((IsShadowMem((uptr)(p +
size * kShadowCnt / kShadowCell - 1)))) != (0)" (0x0, 0x0)
#0 __tsan::PrintCurrentStackSlow()
../../../../gcc/libsanitizer/tsan/tsan_rtl_report.cc:710 (a.out+0x00000005840c)
#1 __tsan::TsanCheckFailed(char const*, int, char const*, unsigned long
long, unsigned long long)
../../../../gcc/libsanitizer/tsan/tsan_rtl_report.cc:39 (a.out+0x0000000584e2)
#2 __sanitizer::CheckFailed(char const*, int, char const*, unsigned long
long, unsigned long long)
../../../../gcc/libsanitizer/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_common.cc:74
(a.out+0x00000005ea93)
#3 MemoryRangeSet ../../../../gcc/libsanitizer/tsan/tsan_rtl.cc:587
(a.out+0x00000001e1d6)
#4 __tsan::user_alloc(__tsan::ThreadState*, unsigned long, unsigned long,
unsigned long) ../../../../gcc/libsanitizer/tsan/tsan_mman.cc:113
(a.out+0x00000005403a)
#5 calloc ../../../../gcc/libsanitizer/tsan/tsan_interceptors.cc:500
(a.out+0x00000003d4d4)
#6 _dl_allocate_tls <null>:0 (ld-linux-x86-64.so.2+0x000000012074)
#7 __pthread_create_2_1 <null>:0 (libpthread.so.0+0x000000008abc)
#8 pthread_create
../../../../gcc/libsanitizer/tsan/tsan_interceptors.cc:891
(a.out+0x00000003b758)
#9 main /home/kcc/tmp/simple_race.cc:23 (a.out+0x000000079473)
#10 __libc_start_main <null>:0 (libc.so.6+0x00000002176c)
#11 <null> <null>:0 (a.out+0x000000010694)
% cat simple_race.cc
#include <pthread.h>
int Global;
void *Thread1(void *x) {
Global++;
return NULL;
}
int main() {
pthread_t t;
pthread_create(&t, NULL, Thread1, NULL);
Global++;
pthread_join(t, NULL);
}
%
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug sanitizer/61095] tsan is broken in gcc trunk, works in 4.9
2014-05-07 11:16 [Bug sanitizer/61095] New: tsan is broken in gcc trunk, works in 4.9 kcc at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2014-05-07 12:03 ` kcc at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-05-07 12:50 ` [Bug sanitizer/61095] [4.10 Regression] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (14 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: kcc at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-05-07 12:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61095
--- Comment #1 from Kostya Serebryany <kcc at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
I suspect a miscompile,
at least the following patch to the libsanitizer sources fixes the problem:
--- tsan_rtl.cc (revision 210145)
+++ tsan_rtl.cc (working copy)
@@ -584,7 +584,8 @@
if (kGoMode || size < 64*1024) {
u64 *p = (u64*)MemToShadow(addr);
CHECK(IsShadowMem((uptr)p));
- CHECK(IsShadowMem((uptr)(p + size * kShadowCnt / kShadowCell - 1)));
+ volatile uptr xxx = (uptr)(p + size * kShadowCnt / kShadowCell - 1);
+ CHECK(IsShadowMem(xxx));
// FIXME: may overwrite a part outside the region
for (uptr i = 0; i < size / kShadowCell * kShadowCnt;) {
p[i++] = val;
Note the "volatile". W/o volatile tsan still crashes.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug sanitizer/61095] [4.10 Regression] tsan is broken in gcc trunk, works in 4.9
2014-05-07 11:16 [Bug sanitizer/61095] New: tsan is broken in gcc trunk, works in 4.9 kcc at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-05-07 12:03 ` [Bug sanitizer/61095] " kcc at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2014-05-07 12:50 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-05-07 12:55 ` [Bug sanitizer/61095] miscompile: " kcc at gcc dot gnu.org
` (13 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-05-07 12:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61095
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target| |x86_64-*-*
Target Milestone|--- |4.10.0
Summary|tsan is broken in gcc |[4.10 Regression] tsan is
|trunk, works in 4.9 |broken in gcc trunk, works
| |in 4.9
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug sanitizer/61095] miscompile: tsan is broken in gcc trunk, works in 4.9
2014-05-07 11:16 [Bug sanitizer/61095] New: tsan is broken in gcc trunk, works in 4.9 kcc at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-05-07 12:03 ` [Bug sanitizer/61095] " kcc at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-05-07 12:50 ` [Bug sanitizer/61095] [4.10 Regression] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2014-05-07 12:55 ` kcc at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-05-07 13:04 ` [Bug sanitizer/61095] [4.10 Regression] " kcc at gcc dot gnu.org
` (12 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: kcc at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-05-07 12:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61095
Kostya Serebryany <kcc at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target|x86_64-*-* |
Priority|P3 |P1
Target Milestone|4.10.0 |---
Summary|[4.10 Regression] tsan is |miscompile: tsan is broken
|broken in gcc trunk, works |in gcc trunk, works in 4.9
|in 4.9 |
--- Comment #2 from Kostya Serebryany <kcc at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
fresh gcc optimizes away a piece of code. minimal repro:
int FOO(unsigned long addr) {
unsigned long *p = (unsigned long*)((addr & 0xffff83fffffffff8UL) * 4);
unsigned long xxx = (unsigned long)(p + 1);
return xxx >= 0x3c000000000UL;
}
gcc 4.9:
/usr/local/gcc-4.9.0/bin/gcc -S z.c -O2 -o - | grep -A 10 FOO:
FOO:
.LFB0:
.cfi_startproc
movabsq $-136339441844232, %rax
andq %rax, %rdi
movabsq $4123168604159, %rax
leaq 8(,%rdi,4), %rdx
cmpq %rax, %rdx
seta %al
movzbl %al, %eax
ret
trunk:
../gcc-inst/bin/gcc -S z.c -O2 -o - | grep -A 10 FOO:
FOO:
.LFB0:
.cfi_startproc
xorl %eax, %eax
ret
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug sanitizer/61095] [4.10 Regression] miscompile: tsan is broken in gcc trunk, works in 4.9
2014-05-07 11:16 [Bug sanitizer/61095] New: tsan is broken in gcc trunk, works in 4.9 kcc at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2014-05-07 12:55 ` [Bug sanitizer/61095] miscompile: " kcc at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2014-05-07 13:04 ` kcc at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-05-07 13:25 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (11 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: kcc at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-05-07 13:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61095
Kostya Serebryany <kcc at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target| |x86_64-*-*
Target Milestone|--- |4.10.0
Summary|miscompile: tsan is broken |[4.10 Regression]
|in gcc trunk, works in 4.9 |miscompile: tsan is broken
| |in gcc trunk, works in 4.9
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug sanitizer/61095] [4.10 Regression] miscompile: tsan is broken in gcc trunk, works in 4.9
2014-05-07 11:16 [Bug sanitizer/61095] New: tsan is broken in gcc trunk, works in 4.9 kcc at gcc dot gnu.org
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2014-05-07 13:04 ` [Bug sanitizer/61095] [4.10 Regression] " kcc at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2014-05-07 13:25 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-05-07 13:27 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (10 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-05-07 13:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61095
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed| |2014-05-07
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Confirmed.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug sanitizer/61095] [4.10 Regression] miscompile: tsan is broken in gcc trunk, works in 4.9
2014-05-07 11:16 [Bug sanitizer/61095] New: tsan is broken in gcc trunk, works in 4.9 kcc at gcc dot gnu.org
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2014-05-07 13:27 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2014-05-07 13:27 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-05-07 13:29 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (8 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-05-07 13:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61095
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
CCP2 does this to
<bb 2>:
_2 = addr_1(D) & 18446607734267707384;
_3 = _2 * 4;
p_4 = (long unsigned int *) _3;
_5 = p_4 + 8;
xxx_6 = (long unsigned int) _5;
_7 = xxx_6 > 4123168604159;
_8 = (int) _7;
return _8;
but not CCP1 to
<bb 2>:
_2 = addr_1(D) & 18446607734267707384;
_3 = _2 * 4;
p_4 = (long unsigned int *) _3;
_5 = p_4 + 8;
xxx_6 = (long unsigned int) _5;
_7 = xxx_6 > 4123168604159;
_8 = (int) _7;
return _8;
that's weird.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug sanitizer/61095] [4.10 Regression] miscompile: tsan is broken in gcc trunk, works in 4.9
2014-05-07 11:16 [Bug sanitizer/61095] New: tsan is broken in gcc trunk, works in 4.9 kcc at gcc dot gnu.org
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2014-05-07 13:25 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2014-05-07 13:27 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-05-07 13:27 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (9 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-05-07 13:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61095
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Started with r210113.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug sanitizer/61095] [4.10 Regression] miscompile: tsan is broken in gcc trunk, works in 4.9
2014-05-07 11:16 [Bug sanitizer/61095] New: tsan is broken in gcc trunk, works in 4.9 kcc at gcc dot gnu.org
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2014-05-07 13:27 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2014-05-07 13:29 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-05-07 16:28 ` rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
` (7 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-05-07 13:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61095
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Diffs:
@@ -53,31 +53,31 @@
Visiting statement:
p_4 = (long unsigned int *) _3;
which is likely CONSTANT
-Lattice value changed to CONSTANT 0x0 (0x0ffffffffffffffe0). Adding SSA edges
to worklist.
+Lattice value changed to CONSTANT 0x0 (0xffffffe0). Adding SSA edges to
workli
st.
adding stmt 3 to worklist
...
Visiting statement:
xxx_6 = (long unsigned int) _5;
which is likely CONSTANT
-Lattice value changed to CONSTANT 0x8 (0x0ffffffffffffffe0). Adding SSA edges
to worklist.
+Lattice value changed to CONSTANT 0x8 (0xffffffe0). Adding SSA edges to
worklist.
adding stmt 5 to worklist
...
Visiting statement:
_7 = xxx_6 > 4123168604159;
which is likely CONSTANT
-Lattice value changed to CONSTANT 0x0 (0x1). Adding SSA edges to worklist.
+Lattice value changed to CONSTANT 0. Adding SSA edges to worklist.
adding stmt 6 to worklist
weird.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug sanitizer/61095] [4.10 Regression] miscompile: tsan is broken in gcc trunk, works in 4.9
2014-05-07 11:16 [Bug sanitizer/61095] New: tsan is broken in gcc trunk, works in 4.9 kcc at gcc dot gnu.org
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2014-05-07 13:29 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2014-05-07 16:28 ` rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-05-07 18:01 ` rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
` (6 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-05-07 16:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61095
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org <rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC| |rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #7 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org <rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Patch part way through testing. It was a silly
"int | unsigned int -> HOST_WIDE_INT" extension bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug sanitizer/61095] [4.10 Regression] miscompile: tsan is broken in gcc trunk, works in 4.9
2014-05-07 11:16 [Bug sanitizer/61095] New: tsan is broken in gcc trunk, works in 4.9 kcc at gcc dot gnu.org
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2014-05-07 16:28 ` rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2014-05-07 18:01 ` rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-05-08 4:35 ` kcc at gcc dot gnu.org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-05-07 18:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61095
--- Comment #8 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org <rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Author: rsandifo
Date: Wed May 7 18:00:59 2014
New Revision: 210181
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=210181&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/
PR tree-optimization/61095
* tree-ssanames.c (get_nonzero_bits): Fix type extension in wi::shwi.
Modified:
trunk/gcc/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/tree-ssanames.c
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug sanitizer/61095] [4.10 Regression] miscompile: tsan is broken in gcc trunk, works in 4.9
2014-05-07 11:16 [Bug sanitizer/61095] New: tsan is broken in gcc trunk, works in 4.9 kcc at gcc dot gnu.org
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
2014-05-07 18:01 ` rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2014-05-08 4:35 ` kcc at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-05-08 4:39 ` kcc at gcc dot gnu.org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: kcc at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-05-08 4:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61095
--- Comment #9 from Kostya Serebryany <kcc at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
I confirm that the minimized reproducer is fixed, but tsan is still crashing on
the same CHECK:
../gcc-inst/bin/g++ -g -fsanitize=thread -fPIE -pie -static-libtsan
simple_race.cc && ./a.out
FATAL: ThreadSanitizer CHECK failed:
../../../../gcc/libsanitizer/tsan/tsan_rtl.cc:587 "((IsShadowMem((uptr)(p +
size * kShadowCnt / kShadowCell - 1)))) != (0)" (0x0, 0x0)
#0 __tsan::PrintCurrentStackSlow()
../../../../gcc/libsanitizer/tsan/tsan_rtl_report.cc:710 (a.out+0x00000005840c)
#1 __tsan::TsanCheckFailed(char const*, int, char const*, unsigned long
long, unsigned long long)
../../../../gcc/libsanitizer/tsan/tsan_rtl_report.cc:39 (a.out+0x0000000584e2)
#2 __sanitizer::CheckFailed(char const*, int, char const*, unsigned long
long, unsigned long long)
../../../../gcc/libsanitizer/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_common.cc:74
(a.out+0x00000005ea93)
#3 MemoryRangeSet ../../../../gcc/libsanitizer/tsan/tsan_rtl.cc:587
(a.out+0x00000001e1d6)
Maybe there is another similar issue somewhere nearby
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug sanitizer/61095] [4.10 Regression] miscompile: tsan is broken in gcc trunk, works in 4.9
2014-05-07 11:16 [Bug sanitizer/61095] New: tsan is broken in gcc trunk, works in 4.9 kcc at gcc dot gnu.org
` (10 preceding siblings ...)
2014-05-08 4:35 ` kcc at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2014-05-08 4:39 ` kcc at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-05-08 7:19 ` kcc at gcc dot gnu.org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: kcc at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-05-08 4:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61095
--- Comment #10 from Kostya Serebryany <kcc at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
also, just curious: are such fixes supposed to be accompanied with regression
tests?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug sanitizer/61095] [4.10 Regression] miscompile: tsan is broken in gcc trunk, works in 4.9
2014-05-07 11:16 [Bug sanitizer/61095] New: tsan is broken in gcc trunk, works in 4.9 kcc at gcc dot gnu.org
` (11 preceding siblings ...)
2014-05-08 4:39 ` kcc at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2014-05-08 7:19 ` kcc at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-05-08 7:34 ` rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: kcc at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-05-08 7:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61095
--- Comment #11 from Kostya Serebryany <kcc at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
ignore comment #9, everything seems to work now.
This passes:
make -j 40 -C gcc check-g{cc,++}
RUNTESTFLAGS='--target_board=unix\{-m32,-m64\} tsan.exp'
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug sanitizer/61095] [4.10 Regression] miscompile: tsan is broken in gcc trunk, works in 4.9
2014-05-07 11:16 [Bug sanitizer/61095] New: tsan is broken in gcc trunk, works in 4.9 kcc at gcc dot gnu.org
` (12 preceding siblings ...)
2014-05-08 7:19 ` kcc at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2014-05-08 7:34 ` rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-05-08 8:01 ` rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-05-08 19:29 ` rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-05-08 7:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61095
--- Comment #12 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org <rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Kostya Serebryany from comment #10)
> also, just curious: are such fixes supposed to be accompanied with
> regression tests?
You're right of course. I'll send a testsuite patch soon.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug sanitizer/61095] [4.10 Regression] miscompile: tsan is broken in gcc trunk, works in 4.9
2014-05-07 11:16 [Bug sanitizer/61095] New: tsan is broken in gcc trunk, works in 4.9 kcc at gcc dot gnu.org
` (13 preceding siblings ...)
2014-05-08 7:34 ` rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2014-05-08 8:01 ` rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-05-08 19:29 ` rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-05-08 8:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61095
--- Comment #13 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org <rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Author: rsandifo
Date: Thu May 8 08:00:21 2014
New Revision: 210203
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=210203&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/testsuite/
PR tree-optimization/61095
* gcc.dg/torture/pr61095.c: New test.
Added:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/pr61095.c
Modified:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug sanitizer/61095] [4.10 Regression] miscompile: tsan is broken in gcc trunk, works in 4.9
2014-05-07 11:16 [Bug sanitizer/61095] New: tsan is broken in gcc trunk, works in 4.9 kcc at gcc dot gnu.org
` (14 preceding siblings ...)
2014-05-08 8:01 ` rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2014-05-08 19:29 ` rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-05-08 19:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61095
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org <rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #14 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org <rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Fixed.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2014-05-08 19:29 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2014-05-07 11:16 [Bug sanitizer/61095] New: tsan is broken in gcc trunk, works in 4.9 kcc at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-05-07 12:03 ` [Bug sanitizer/61095] " kcc at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-05-07 12:50 ` [Bug sanitizer/61095] [4.10 Regression] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-05-07 12:55 ` [Bug sanitizer/61095] miscompile: " kcc at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-05-07 13:04 ` [Bug sanitizer/61095] [4.10 Regression] " kcc at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-05-07 13:25 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-05-07 13:27 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-05-07 13:27 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-05-07 13:29 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-05-07 16:28 ` rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-05-07 18:01 ` rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-05-08 4:35 ` kcc at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-05-08 4:39 ` kcc at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-05-08 7:19 ` kcc at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-05-08 7:34 ` rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-05-08 8:01 ` rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-05-08 19:29 ` rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).