From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31609 invoked by alias); 9 May 2014 11:29:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 31566 invoked by uid 48); 9 May 2014 11:29:19 -0000 From: "zadeck at naturalbridge dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug middle-end/61111] [4.10 regression] Infinite recursion between fold_build2_stat_loc and fold_binary_loc Date: Fri, 09 May 2014 11:29:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.10.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: zadeck at naturalbridge dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.10.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc attachments.created Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2014-05/txt/msg00792.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61111 Kenneth Zadeck changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |zadeck at naturalbridge dot com --- Comment #8 from Kenneth Zadeck --- Created attachment 32767 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32767&action=edit patch to fix. I agree with richi that the mask should have been w bits wide. I test the patch on x86_64 last night and it causes no harm. ok to commit?