From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-451103-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 4357 invoked by alias); 9 May 2014 11:35:23 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 4287 invoked by uid 55); 9 May 2014 11:35:20 -0000
From: "rguenther at suse dot de" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug middle-end/61111] [4.10 regression] Infinite recursion between fold_build2_stat_loc and fold_binary_loc
Date: Fri, 09 May 2014 11:35:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.10.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenther at suse dot de
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.10.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-61111-4-YQkk7IJPad@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-61111-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-61111-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2014-05/txt/msg00795.txt.bz2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61111

--- Comment #9 from rguenther at suse dot de <rguenther at suse dot de> ---
On Fri, 9 May 2014, zadeck at naturalbridge dot com wrote:

> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61111
> 
> Kenneth Zadeck <zadeck at naturalbridge dot com> changed:
> 
>            What    |Removed                     |Added
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>                  CC|                            |zadeck at naturalbridge dot com
> 
> --- Comment #8 from Kenneth Zadeck <zadeck at naturalbridge dot com> ---
> Created attachment 32767
>   --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32767&action=edit
> patch to fix.
> 
> I agree with richi that the mask should have been w bits wide.
> I test the patch on x86_64 last night and it causes no harm.
> 
> ok to commit?

Ok.