public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "patrick at parcs dot ath.cx" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug ipa/61144] [4.9/4.10 Regression] Invalid optimizations for extern vars with local weak definitions
Date: Wed, 02 Jul 2014 12:23:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-61144-4-h4ZK7kuUHU@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-61144-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61144

patrick at parcs dot ath.cx changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |patrick at parcs dot ath.cx

--- Comment #23 from patrick at parcs dot ath.cx ---
(In reply to Rich Felker from comment #22)
> > Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
> >            What    |Removed                     |Added
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >            Priority|P3                          |P2
> 
> Can we please make this P1 rather than P2? It is a wrong-code
> regression and only present in a single release, so by the bug
> management guidelines (https://gcc.gnu.org/bugs/management.html) I
> think it should be P1.
> 
> There is already a working patch, test-case, and discussion on the
> gcc-patches list so I don't see what's blocking fixing it before the
> next release.

It looks like this bug has been recently fixed in the trunk (no testsuite
addition however).  I'm not sure what its status is on the release branches,
though.


  parent reply	other threads:[~2014-07-02 12:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-05-11  1:30 [Bug c/61144] New: " bugdal at aerifal dot cx
2014-05-11  3:20 ` [Bug c/61144] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-05-11  3:32 ` bugdal at aerifal dot cx
2014-05-11  3:33 ` bugdal at aerifal dot cx
2014-05-11 19:05 ` bugdal at aerifal dot cx
2014-05-11 19:41 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-05-11 20:05 ` bugdal at aerifal dot cx
2014-05-12  4:18 ` cloos at jhcloos dot com
2014-05-12 13:23 ` jody at jodybruchon dot com
2014-05-12 13:59 ` cloos at jhcloos dot com
2014-05-12 17:42 ` bugdal at aerifal dot cx
2014-05-12 19:02 ` bugdal at aerifal dot cx
2014-05-12 20:31 ` glisse at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-05-13  3:26 ` bugdal at aerifal dot cx
2014-05-13  8:45 ` glisse at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-05-13 11:19 ` [Bug ipa/61144] [4.9/4.10 Regression] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-05-14  5:08 ` bugdal at aerifal dot cx
2014-05-20  8:31 ` bugdal at aerifal dot cx
2014-05-20 20:28 ` bugdal at aerifal dot cx
2014-06-26 13:05 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-06-26 13:36 ` bugdal at aerifal dot cx
2014-07-02 12:23 ` patrick at parcs dot ath.cx [this message]
2014-07-02 14:47 ` bugdal at aerifal dot cx
2014-07-14 16:12 ` amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-07-14 16:13 ` amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-07-16 13:30 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-07-16 18:17 ` bugdal at aerifal dot cx
2014-07-30  9:14 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-07-31 22:56 ` bugdal at aerifal dot cx
2014-10-05  4:56 ` [Bug ipa/61144] [4.9/5 " hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-10-05  4:56 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-10-05  4:56 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-10-05  4:58 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-61144-4-h4ZK7kuUHU@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).