From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-451320-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 14438 invoked by alias); 12 May 2014 12:47:59 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 14399 invoked by uid 48); 12 May 2014 12:47:55 -0000
From: "christophe.lyon at st dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/61153] [ARM] vbic vorn tests fail
Date: Mon, 12 May 2014 12:47:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.10.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: christophe.lyon at st dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-61153-4-AIUBCUqm4F@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-61153-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-61153-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2014-05/txt/msg01012.txt.bz2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61153

--- Comment #2 from christophe.lyon at st dot com ---
OK, but my tests currently don't inspect the generated code.

They are execution tests, which means the could be PASS using only core
instructions, and no Neon one.

So maybe we should add some optimization level to the existing tests in the
meantime?