From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-451396-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 28899 invoked by alias); 13 May 2014 05:10:48 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 28851 invoked by uid 48); 13 May 2014 05:10:43 -0000
From: "tromey at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c/61162] possibly bad error location with -Wc++-compat
Date: Tue, 13 May 2014 05:10:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c
X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: tromey at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.10.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-61162-4-W4fmwjIwk6@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-61162-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-61162-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2014-05/txt/msg01088.txt.bz2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D61162

--- Comment #2 from Tom Tromey <tromey at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Note that it is also wrong for a conversion diagnosed
in a "return":

enum e { ZERO =3D 0, ONE };

enum e f(void)
{
  return 0;
}


barimba. gcc --syntax-only -Wc++-compat r.c
r.c: In function =E2=80=98f=E2=80=99:
r.c:5:3: warning: enum conversion in return is invalid in C++ [-Wc++-compat]
   return 0;
   ^


I think it should point to the expression.
>>From gcc-bugs-return-451397-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue May 13 05:32:21 2014
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-451397-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 5198 invoked by alias); 13 May 2014 05:32:20 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 5166 invoked by uid 48); 13 May 2014 05:32:15 -0000
From: "mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c/61162] possibly bad error location with -Wc++-compat
Date: Tue, 13 May 2014 05:32:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c
X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.10.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-61162-4-dGSjFUeZEl@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-61162-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-61162-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2014-05/txt/msg01089.txt.bz2
Content-length: 208

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61162

--- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek <mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
I posted a patch, but the location for a return stmt will need more surgery
than that.