From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11479 invoked by alias); 21 May 2014 17:15:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 10994 invoked by uid 48); 21 May 2014 17:15:53 -0000 From: "redi at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/61276] warn about possible coding errors with logical not (!) Date: Wed, 21 May 2014 17:15:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.9.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: diagnostic X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: redi at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: keywords Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2014-05/txt/msg01882.txt.bz2 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D61276 Jonathan Wakely changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |diagnostic --- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Manuel L=C3=B3pez-Ib=C3=A1=C3=B1ez from comment #3) > Just to mention that I cloned PR 61271 to not forget about implementing t= he > warning once the problematic code is fixed. So this PR should be about > implementing the warning, rather than fixing any particular problems. Oops, sorry I didn't read it properly! (In reply to Manuel L=C3=B3pez-Ib=C3=A1=C3=B1ez from comment #4) > Can't Google/RedHat/Oracle/Suse/Mentor/ARM/Linaro poll resources and have= at > least one GCC developer committed to diagnostic issues? Just a single one > full-time developer will make such a huge difference. Although I agree with the sentiment it's just not practical, a full-time developer can't really have seven different employers. >>From gcc-bugs-return-452191-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed May 21 17:23:50 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 17192 invoked by alias); 21 May 2014 17:23:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 17147 invoked by uid 55); 21 May 2014 17:23:41 -0000 From: "jason at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/61133] g++ doesn't implement DR1760 Date: Wed, 21 May 2014 17:23:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.10.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: accepts-invalid X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jason at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2014-05/txt/msg01883.txt.bz2 Content-length: 551 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61133 --- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Wed May 21 17:23:07 2014 New Revision: 210720 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=210720&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/61133 * lambda.c (build_capture_proxy, add_capture): Treat normal captures and init-captures identically. Added: trunk/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp1y/lambda-init8.C Modified: trunk/gcc/cp/ChangeLog trunk/gcc/cp/lambda.c trunk/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp1y/lambda-init6.C