public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug sanitizer/61293] asan can not find left buffer overflow of new[]-allocated buffer, frontend help needed
Date: Fri, 23 May 2014 13:26:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-61293-4-a9uEnmvIty@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-61293-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61293

Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |jason at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
IMNSHO you can't change the value of extra, that is an ABI issue,
and -fsanitize=address shouldn't be an ABI changing option.  Consider:
struct S { S (); ~S (); };
S *foo (int n) { return new S[n]; }
void bar (S *p) { delete [] p; }
int main () { bar (foo (5)); }
where bar is defined in a different compilation unit/library and something is
built with -fsanitize=address, something is not.

If the padding before structure is at least 64-bit, sure, instrumenting the FE
to put there an __asan_poison_memory_region call after the size is stored there
and in delete[] again to __asan_unpoison_memory_region before reading the size
should not be that hard.

For 32-bit code if the type doesn't need at least 64-bit alignment (again,
alignment of the type is an ABI thing), you are out of luck I'm afraid.
Thus, e.g. tests for this will need to be conditionalized.


  reply	other threads:[~2014-05-23 13:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-05-23 13:08 [Bug sanitizer/61293] New: " kcc at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-05-23 13:26 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2014-05-23 13:51 ` [Bug sanitizer/61293] " kcc at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-05-23 14:14 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-08-28  1:19 ` kcc at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-61293-4-a9uEnmvIty@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).