public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug target/61331] New: [ARM] GCC build broken since r210964/r210954
@ 2014-05-27 14:58 christophe.lyon at st dot com
2014-05-27 14:58 ` [Bug target/61331] " christophe.lyon at st dot com
` (8 more replies)
0 siblings, 9 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: christophe.lyon at st dot com @ 2014-05-27 14:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61331
Bug ID: 61331
Summary: [ARM] GCC build broken since r210964/r210954
Product: gcc
Version: 4.10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: christophe.lyon at st dot com
Build of GCC trunk is broken since commits 210964 and 210965 for ARM targets.
$
/work1/lyon/Work/ARM/Linaro/builds/gcc-fsf-trunk/obj-arm-none-linux-gnueabihf/gcc1/./gcc/xgcc
-B/work1/lyon/Work/ARM/Linaro/builds/gcc-fsf-trunk/obj-arm-none-linux-gnueabihf/gc\
c1/./gcc/
-B/work1/lyon/Work/ARM/Linaro/builds/gcc-fsf-trunk/tools/arm-none-linux-gnueabihf/bin/
-B/work1/lyon/Work/ARM/Linaro/builds/gcc-fsf-trunk/tools/arm-none-linux-gnueabihf\
/lib/ -g -O2 -fPIC -fno-inline -g -fbuilding-libgcc -fno-stack-protector
-fPIC -fno-inline -o unwind-arm.o -fexceptions -c unwind-arm.i
-fvisibility=hidden
/work1/lyon/Work/ARM/Linaro/sources/gcc-fsf/trunk/libgcc/config/arm/unwind-arm.c:
In function '_Unwind_VRS_Pop':
/work1/lyon/Work/ARM/Linaro/sources/gcc-fsf/trunk/libgcc/config/arm/unwind-arm.c:446:1:
internal compiler error: in lra_update_insn_recog_data, at lra.c:1363
}
^
0x86af74 lra_update_insn_recog_data(rtx_def*)
/work1/lyon/Work/ARM/Linaro/sources/gcc-fsf/trun/gcc/lra.c:1362
0x881692 eliminate_regs_in_insn
/work1/lyon/Work/ARM/Linaro/sources/gcc-fsf/trunk/gcc/lra-eliminations.c:1077
0x881c44 process_insn_for_elimination
/work1/lyon/Work/ARM/Linaro/sources/gcc-fsf/trunk/gcc/lra-eliminations.c:1344
0x881c44 lra_eliminate(bool,bool)
/work1/lyon/Work/ARM/Linaro/sources/gcc-fsf/trunk/gcc/lra-eliminations.c:1408
0x87bc0a lra_constraints(bool)
/work1/lyon/Work/ARM/Linaro/sources/gcc-fsf/trunk/gcc/lra-constraints.c:4049
0x86c84c lra(_IO_FILE*)
/work1/lyon/Work/ARM/Linaro/sources/gcc-fsf/trunk/gcc/lra.c:2332
0x82b80e do_reload
/work1/lyon/Work/ARM/Linaro/sources/gcc-fsf/trunk/gcc/ira.c:5444
0x82b80e execute
/work1/lyon/Work/ARM/Linaro/sources/gcc-fsf/trunk/gcc/ira.c:5605
GCC configured with --target=arm-none-linux-gnueabihf --disable-nls
--without-headers --with-newlib --disable-shared --disable-threads
--disable-libssp --disable-libgomp --disable-libmudflap --disable-libatomic
--without-libquadmath --disable-libquadmath --enable-languages=c
--with-float=hard --enable-build-with-cxx --with-mode=arm --with-cpu=cortex-a9
--with-fpu=neon
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/61331] [ARM] GCC build broken since r210964/r210954
2014-05-27 14:58 [Bug target/61331] New: [ARM] GCC build broken since r210964/r210954 christophe.lyon at st dot com
@ 2014-05-27 14:58 ` christophe.lyon at st dot com
2014-05-28 22:56 ` [Bug target/61331] [ARM] GCC build broken since r210964/r210965 bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot de
` (7 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: christophe.lyon at st dot com @ 2014-05-27 14:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61331
--- Comment #1 from christophe.lyon at st dot com ---
Created attachment 32865
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32865&action=edit
unwind-arm.i
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/61331] [ARM] GCC build broken since r210964/r210965
2014-05-27 14:58 [Bug target/61331] New: [ARM] GCC build broken since r210964/r210954 christophe.lyon at st dot com
2014-05-27 14:58 ` [Bug target/61331] " christophe.lyon at st dot com
@ 2014-05-28 22:56 ` bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot de
2014-05-29 6:47 ` rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
` (6 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot de @ 2014-05-28 22:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61331
Bernd Edlinger <bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot de> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |rdsandiford at googlemail dot com
--- Comment #2 from Bernd Edlinger <bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot de> ---
Richard,
the build is still broken, even after r211031.
could you please have a look?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/61331] [ARM] GCC build broken since r210964/r210965
2014-05-27 14:58 [Bug target/61331] New: [ARM] GCC build broken since r210964/r210954 christophe.lyon at st dot com
2014-05-27 14:58 ` [Bug target/61331] " christophe.lyon at st dot com
2014-05-28 22:56 ` [Bug target/61331] [ARM] GCC build broken since r210964/r210965 bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot de
@ 2014-05-29 6:47 ` rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-05-29 7:38 ` bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot de
` (5 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-05-29 6:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61331
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org <rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org <rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Bernd Edlinger from comment #2)
> Richard,
>
> the build is still broken, even after r211031.
>
> could you please have a look?
r211031 wasn't related to this. Please see:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-05/msg02312.html
for the patch I'd suggested.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/61331] [ARM] GCC build broken since r210964/r210965
2014-05-27 14:58 [Bug target/61331] New: [ARM] GCC build broken since r210964/r210954 christophe.lyon at st dot com
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2014-05-29 6:47 ` rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2014-05-29 7:38 ` bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot de
2014-05-29 8:00 ` rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot de @ 2014-05-29 7:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61331
--- Comment #4 from Bernd Edlinger <bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot de> ---
(In reply to rsandifo@gcc.gnu.org from comment #3)
> (In reply to Bernd Edlinger from comment #2)
> > Richard,
> >
> > the build is still broken, even after r211031.
> >
> > could you please have a look?
>
> r211031 wasn't related to this. Please see:
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-05/msg02312.html
>
> for the patch I'd suggested.
Ok, this would fix the boot-strap problem.
Are you gonna apply it now?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/61331] [ARM] GCC build broken since r210964/r210965
2014-05-27 14:58 [Bug target/61331] New: [ARM] GCC build broken since r210964/r210954 christophe.lyon at st dot com
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2014-05-29 7:38 ` bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot de
@ 2014-05-29 8:00 ` rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-05-29 8:14 ` bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot de
` (3 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-05-29 8:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61331
--- Comment #5 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org <rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Bernd Edlinger from comment #4)
> (In reply to rsandifo@gcc.gnu.org from comment #3)
> > (In reply to Bernd Edlinger from comment #2)
> > > Richard,
> > >
> > > the build is still broken, even after r211031.
> > >
> > > could you please have a look?
> >
> > r211031 wasn't related to this. Please see:
> >
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-05/msg02312.html
> >
> > for the patch I'd suggested.
>
> Ok, this would fix the boot-strap problem.
> Are you gonna apply it now?
It needs to be approved by a maintainer first.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/61331] [ARM] GCC build broken since r210964/r210965
2014-05-27 14:58 [Bug target/61331] New: [ARM] GCC build broken since r210964/r210954 christophe.lyon at st dot com
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2014-05-29 8:00 ` rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2014-05-29 8:14 ` bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot de
2014-05-31 13:49 ` bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot de
` (2 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot de @ 2014-05-29 8:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61331
--- Comment #6 from Bernd Edlinger <bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot de> ---
(In reply to rsandifo@gcc.gnu.org from comment #5)
> (In reply to Bernd Edlinger from comment #4)
> > (In reply to rsandifo@gcc.gnu.org from comment #3)
> > > (In reply to Bernd Edlinger from comment #2)
> > > > Richard,
> > > >
> > > > the build is still broken, even after r211031.
> > > >
> > > > could you please have a look?
> > >
> > > r211031 wasn't related to this. Please see:
> > >
> > > https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-05/msg02312.html
> > >
> > > for the patch I'd suggested.
> >
> > Ok, this would fix the boot-strap problem.
> > Are you gonna apply it now?
>
> It needs to be approved by a maintainer first.
well, did not explicitly ask for approval?
The message should be marked as PATCH,
and contain a statement like:
"Boot-strapped and regression-tested on arm-xyz-eabi,
OK for thunk"?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/61331] [ARM] GCC build broken since r210964/r210965
2014-05-27 14:58 [Bug target/61331] New: [ARM] GCC build broken since r210964/r210954 christophe.lyon at st dot com
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2014-05-29 8:14 ` bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot de
@ 2014-05-31 13:49 ` bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot de
2014-06-02 11:33 ` rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-07-10 9:07 ` ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot de @ 2014-05-31 13:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61331
--- Comment #7 from Bernd Edlinger <bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot de> ---
Fixed with r211050. Thanks!
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/61331] [ARM] GCC build broken since r210964/r210965
2014-05-27 14:58 [Bug target/61331] New: [ARM] GCC build broken since r210964/r210954 christophe.lyon at st dot com
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2014-05-31 13:49 ` bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot de
@ 2014-06-02 11:33 ` rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-07-10 9:07 ` ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-06-02 11:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61331
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org <rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |naroyce at hotmail dot com
--- Comment #8 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org <rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
*** Bug 61353 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/61331] [ARM] GCC build broken since r210964/r210965
2014-05-27 14:58 [Bug target/61331] New: [ARM] GCC build broken since r210964/r210954 christophe.lyon at st dot com
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2014-06-02 11:33 ` rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2014-07-10 9:07 ` ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-07-10 9:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61331
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target| |arm*
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Known to work| |4.9.0
Keywords| |build
CC| |ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Target Milestone|--- |4.10.0
Known to fail| |4.10.0
--- Comment #9 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
This has been fixed it seems
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2014-07-10 9:07 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2014-05-27 14:58 [Bug target/61331] New: [ARM] GCC build broken since r210964/r210954 christophe.lyon at st dot com
2014-05-27 14:58 ` [Bug target/61331] " christophe.lyon at st dot com
2014-05-28 22:56 ` [Bug target/61331] [ARM] GCC build broken since r210964/r210965 bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot de
2014-05-29 6:47 ` rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-05-29 7:38 ` bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot de
2014-05-29 8:00 ` rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-05-29 8:14 ` bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot de
2014-05-31 13:49 ` bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot de
2014-06-02 11:33 ` rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-07-10 9:07 ` ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).