[Bug rtl-optimization/61357] New: Patch for 60969 causes MIPS regressions in register allocation

[Bug rtl-optimization/61357] New: Patch for 60969 causes MIPS regressions in register allocation

[sje at gcc dot gnu.org]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61357

            Bug ID: 61357
           Summary: Patch for 60969 causes MIPS regressions in register
                    allocation
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.9.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: rtl-optimization
          Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
          Reporter: sje at gcc dot gnu.org

This patch (GIT hash c5d7f2f65740ad3659ec083daa6af1df3a6473a7)

2014-05-22  Vladimir Makarov  <vmakarov@redhat.com>

        PR rtl-optimization/60969
        * ira-costs.c (record_reg_classes): Process NO_REGS for matching
        constraints.  Set up mem cost for NO_REGS case.

Causes some test suite failures for MIPS including
gcc.target/mips/umips-lwp-3.c

Here is a modified version of umips-lwp-3.c:

void foo (int *r4)
{
  int r5 = r4[511];
  int r6 = r4[512];
  r4[2] = r5 * r5;
  {
    register int r5asm asm ("$5") = r5;
    register int r6asm asm ("$6") = r6;
    asm ("#foo" : "=m" (r4[3]) : "d" (r5asm), "d" (r6asm));
  }
}

When compiled with: -S -mgp32 -fpeephole2 -mtune=m14k -mmicromips -O2

it used to generate a lwp (load word paired) instruction.  But after
this check in it generates two lw instructions instead.

[Bug target/61357] Patch for 60969 causes MIPS regressions in register allocation

[pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61357

Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |RESOLVED
          Component|rtl-optimization            |target
         Resolution|---                         |FIXED
   Target Milestone|---                         |4.10.0

--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-07/msg01237.html