public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "trippels at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/61360] [5 Regression] ICE: in lra_update_insn_recog_data, at lra.c:1363 with -mtune=bdver4 Date: Sat, 06 Sep 2014 12:22:00 -0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <bug-61360-4-cZGX8YoEaQ@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw) In-Reply-To: <bug-61360-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61360 --- Comment #11 from Markus Trippelsdorf <trippels at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to GGanesh from comment #9) > Patch that fixes this issue has been submitted > https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-08/msg02179.html > > The idea is to prohibit changes to the "enabled" attribute during lra and > reload pass. Here's a small testcase that still ICE's even with your patch applied: % cat utils.i int a, b, c, e, f, g, h; long *d; __attribute__((cold)) void fn1() { int i = g | 1; for (; g; h++) { for (; a; e++) d[0] = c; if (0.002 * i) break; for (; b; f++) d[h] = 0; } } % gcc -march=amdfam10 -O2 -c utils.i utils.i: In function ‘fn1’: utils.i:10:1: internal compiler error: in lra_update_insn_recog_data, at lra.c:1223 } ^ 0x8ddb6c lra_update_insn_recog_data(rtx_insn*) ../../gcc/gcc/lra.c:1222 0x8f4595 eliminate_regs_in_insn ../../gcc/gcc/lra-eliminations.c:1077 0x8f4595 process_insn_for_elimination ../../gcc/gcc/lra-eliminations.c:1344 0x8f4595 lra_eliminate(bool, bool) ../../gcc/gcc/lra-eliminations.c:1408 0x8df81e lra(_IO_FILE*) ../../gcc/gcc/lra.c:2278 0x89ddf6 do_reload ../../gcc/gcc/ira.c:5311 0x89ddf6 execute ../../gcc/gcc/ira.c:5470 Please submit a full bug report, with preprocessed source if appropriate. Please include the complete backtrace with any bug report. See <http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html> for instructions. >From gcc-bugs-return-461355-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Sat Sep 06 13:11:08 2014 Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-461355-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org> Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 27679 invoked by alias); 6 Sep 2014 13:11:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org> List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/> List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org> Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 27609 invoked by uid 48); 6 Sep 2014 13:11:00 -0000 From: "trippels at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/63194] New: [4.9/5 Regression] ICE in maybe_explain_implicit_delete, at cp/method.c:1552 Date: Sat, 06 Sep 2014 13:11:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: new X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: trippels at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter cc Message-ID: <bug-63194-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2014-09/txt/msg01189.txt.bz2 Content-length: 3327 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63194 Bug ID: 63194 Summary: [4.9/5 Regression] ICE in maybe_explain_implicit_delete, at cp/method.c:1552 Product: gcc Version: 5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: trippels at gcc dot gnu.org CC: jason at gcc dot gnu.org Reduced from a huge boost testcase: markus@x4 tmp % cat horzcollisionbar.ii template <int> class A { public: A() noexcept(noexcept(0)) = default; }; class B { A<0> m_points; }; void fn1(A<0>, A<0>) { B(); } markus@x4 tmp % g++ -c -std=c++11 horzcollisionbar.ii horzcollisionbar.ii: In function ‘void fn1(A<0>, A<0>)’: horzcollisionbar.ii:9:26: error: use of deleted function ‘B::B()’ void fn1(A<0>, A<0>) { B(); } ^ horzcollisionbar.ii:6:7: note: ‘B::B()’ is implicitly deleted because the default definition would be ill-formed: class B { ^ horzcollisionbar.ii:6:7: error: use of deleted function ‘A<<anonymous> >::A() [with int <anonymous> = 0]’ horzcollisionbar.ii:4:3: internal compiler error: in maybe_explain_implicit_delete, at cp/method.c:1552 A() noexcept(noexcept(0)) = default; ^ 0x6ea0d8 maybe_explain_implicit_delete(tree_node*) ../../gcc/gcc/cp/method.c:1552 0x653df0 mark_used(tree_node*, int) ../../gcc/gcc/cp/decl2.c:4877 0x57233e build_over_call ../../gcc/gcc/cp/call.c:7019 0x57df65 build_new_method_call_1 ../../gcc/gcc/cp/call.c:8098 0x57df65 build_new_method_call(tree_node*, tree_node*, vec<tree_node*, va_gc, vl_embed>**, tree_node*, int, tree_node**, int) ../../gcc/gcc/cp/call.c:8168 0x6e00ef locate_fn_flags ../../gcc/gcc/cp/method.c:906 0x6e2eca walk_field_subobs ../../gcc/gcc/cp/method.c:1193 0x6e3a34 synthesized_method_walk ../../gcc/gcc/cp/method.c:1435 0x6e9f7f maybe_explain_implicit_delete(tree_node*) ../../gcc/gcc/cp/method.c:1541 0x653df0 mark_used(tree_node*, int) ../../gcc/gcc/cp/decl2.c:4877 0x572cc2 build_over_call ../../gcc/gcc/cp/call.c:7381 0x57df65 build_new_method_call_1 ../../gcc/gcc/cp/call.c:8098 0x57df65 build_new_method_call(tree_node*, tree_node*, vec<tree_node*, va_gc, vl_embed>**, tree_node*, int, tree_node**, int) ../../gcc/gcc/cp/call.c:8168 0x57eed9 build_special_member_call(tree_node*, tree_node*, vec<tree_node*, va_gc, vl_embed>**, tree_node*, int, int) ../../gcc/gcc/cp/call.c:7712 0x6d83ab build_value_init(tree_node*, int) ../../gcc/gcc/cp/init.c:350 0x620e74 build_functional_cast(tree_node*, tree_node*, int) ../../gcc/gcc/cp/typeck2.c:1928 0x687643 cp_parser_functional_cast ../../gcc/gcc/cp/parser.c:23581 0x68118b cp_parser_postfix_expression ../../gcc/gcc/cp/parser.c:5936 0x683e73 cp_parser_unary_expression ../../gcc/gcc/cp/parser.c:7287 0x684c38 cp_parser_binary_expression ../../gcc/gcc/cp/parser.c:8030 Please submit a full bug report, with preprocessed source if appropriate. Please include the complete backtrace with any bug report. Started with r203989. >From gcc-bugs-return-461356-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Sat Sep 06 13:20:39 2014 Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-461356-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org> Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 31299 invoked by alias); 6 Sep 2014 13:20:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org> List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/> List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org> Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 31268 invoked by uid 48); 6 Sep 2014 13:20:35 -0000 From: "trippels at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/63194] [5 Regression] ICE in maybe_explain_implicit_delete, at cp/method.c:1552 Date: Sat, 06 Sep 2014 13:20:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: trippels at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cf_known_to_work short_desc cf_known_to_fail Message-ID: <bug-63194-4-BquPSpkg4P@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-63194-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-63194-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2014-09/txt/msg01190.txt.bz2 Content-length: 716 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?idc194 Markus Trippelsdorf <trippels at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Known to work| |4.8.3, 4.9.0 Summary|[4.9/5 Regression] ICE in |[5 Regression] ICE in |maybe_explain_implicit_dele |maybe_explain_implicit_dele |te, at cp/method.c:1552 |te, at cp/method.c:1552 Known to fail| |5.0 --- Comment #1 from Markus Trippelsdorf <trippels at gcc dot gnu.org> --- Actually gcc-4.9 compiles the testcase without any warning.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-09-06 12:22 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2014-05-29 18:14 [Bug target/61360] New: [4.10 " zsojka at seznam dot cz 2014-06-02 7:59 ` [Bug target/61360] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2014-06-13 10:25 ` trippels at gcc dot gnu.org 2014-06-13 17:15 ` trippels at gcc dot gnu.org 2014-06-14 10:27 ` rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org 2014-06-26 10:45 ` Ganesh.Gopalasubramanian at amd dot com 2014-06-26 17:04 ` zsojka at seznam dot cz 2014-07-07 13:23 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2014-07-10 14:24 ` trippels at gcc dot gnu.org 2014-07-17 6:32 ` trippels at gcc dot gnu.org 2014-08-20 7:47 ` [Bug target/61360] [5 " dcb314 at hotmail dot com 2014-08-26 6:48 ` Ganesh.Gopalasubramanian at amd dot com 2014-08-26 7:25 ` trippels at gcc dot gnu.org 2014-09-06 12:22 ` trippels at gcc dot gnu.org [this message] 2014-09-15 17:22 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com 2014-09-18 15:41 ` vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org 2014-09-18 15:57 ` vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org 2014-12-15 17:48 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2014-12-15 18:49 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=bug-61360-4-cZGX8YoEaQ@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).