From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3786 invoked by alias); 30 May 2014 15:58:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 3759 invoked by uid 48); 30 May 2014 15:58:48 -0000 From: "manu at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug preprocessor/61371] cpp: Implement -fno-date-time/-freproducible-dates or similar Date: Fri, 30 May 2014 15:58:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: preprocessor X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement X-Bugzilla-Who: manu at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2014-05/txt/msg02562.txt.bz2 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D61371 Manuel L=C3=B3pez-Ib=C3=A1=C3=B1ez changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |manu at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1 from Manuel L=C3=B3pez-Ib=C3=A1=C3=B1ez --- You can simply redefine them in the command-line: http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-buildservice/2011-04/msg00049.html isn't that enough? >>From gcc-bugs-return-452871-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Fri May 30 16:01:26 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 5483 invoked by alias); 30 May 2014 16:01:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 5436 invoked by uid 48); 30 May 2014 16:01:22 -0000 From: "crrodriguez at opensuse dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug preprocessor/61371] cpp: Implement -fno-date-time/-freproducible-dates or similar Date: Fri, 30 May 2014 16:01:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: preprocessor X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement X-Bugzilla-Who: crrodriguez at opensuse dot org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2014-05/txt/msg02563.txt.bz2 Content-length: 426 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D61371 --- Comment #2 from Cristian Rodr=C3=ADguez --- (In reply to Manuel L=C3=B3pez-Ib=C3=A1=C3=B1ez from comment #1) > You can simply redefine them in the command-line: >=20 > http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-buildservice/2011-04/msg00049.html >=20 > isn't that enough? It would be.. if there wasn't half a ton of packages using -Werror >>From gcc-bugs-return-452872-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Fri May 30 16:02:07 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 7866 invoked by alias); 30 May 2014 16:02:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 7761 invoked by uid 48); 30 May 2014 16:02:04 -0000 From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug preprocessor/61371] cpp: Implement -fno-date-time/-freproducible-dates or similar Date: Fri, 30 May 2014 16:02:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: preprocessor X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2014-05/txt/msg02564.txt.bz2 Content-length: 304 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61371 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- Why don't you poision the use of __DATE__ and __TIME__ in a header file that you -include to force people not to use use those macros which allows you to audit the packages in one go.