From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1089 invoked by alias); 7 Aug 2014 13:06:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 1029 invoked by uid 48); 7 Aug 2014 13:06:50 -0000 From: "jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug ipa/61393] [trans-mem] O3 optimization level constant propagation problem Date: Thu, 07 Aug 2014 13:06:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: ipa X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.10.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2014-08/txt/msg00463.txt.bz2 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61393 --- Comment #10 from Martin Jambor --- (In reply to torvald from comment #9) > Alex, can you confirm that this is fixed? If you are asking whether the patch makes the reported testcase work as expected then yes, it does, I have verified that.