https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61407 Dominyk Tiller changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dominyktiller at gmail dot com --- Comment #13 from Dominyk Tiller --- This remains an issue on the latest release of 4.9.1 - xgcc: warning: couldn’t understand kern.osversion ‘14.0.0 In file included from /usr/include/stdio.h:65:0, from ../../.././libgcc/../gcc/tsystem.h:87, from ../../.././libgcc/libgcc2.c:27: /usr/include/Availability.h:174:44: error: missing binary operator before token "(" #if defined(__has_feature) && __has_feature(attribute_availability_with_message) ^ In file included from /usr/include/stdio.h:65:0, from ../../.././libgcc/../gcc/tsystem.h:87, from ../../.././libgcc/libgcc2.c:27: /usr/include/Availability.h:184:44: error: missing binary operator before token "(" #if defined(__has_feature) && __has_feature(attribute_availability_app_extension) ^ make[5]: *** [_muldi3.o] Error 1 make[4]: *** [multi-do] Error 1 make[3]: *** [all-multi] Error 2 make[2]: *** [all-stage1-target-libgcc] Error 2 make[1]: *** [stage1-bubble] Error 2 make: *** [all] Error 2 The patch provided on 4.8.3 also doesn't apply to 4.9.1, which was pretty much expected. Is there status/timeline for folding in 10.10 support? >From gcc-bugs-return-456809-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Sun Jul 20 17:00:06 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 28120 invoked by alias); 20 Jul 2014 17:00:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 27580 invoked by uid 48); 20 Jul 2014 16:59:53 -0000 From: "manu at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c/61854] Warning single-line comment for -stdÈ9? Date: Sun, 20 Jul 2014 17:00:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.10.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: manu at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status cf_reconfirmed_on cc everconfirmed Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2014-07/txt/msg01400.txt.bz2 Content-length: 680 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61854 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed| |2014-07-20 CC| |manu at gcc dot gnu.org Ever confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #1 from Manuel López-Ibáñez --- Perhaps GCC should accept // without comment unless -Wpedantic. The current error is nonsensical. >From gcc-bugs-return-456810-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Sun Jul 20 17:36:00 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 19481 invoked by alias); 20 Jul 2014 17:35:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 18828 invoked by uid 48); 20 Jul 2014 17:35:48 -0000 From: "jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug fortran/61632] Memory corruption on error when writing formatted data Date: Sun, 20 Jul 2014 17:35:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.8.2 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: attachments.isobsolete attachments.created Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2014-07/txt/msg01401.txt.bz2 Content-length: 672 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?ida632 Jerry DeLisle changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #33155|0 |1 is obsolete| | --- Comment #21 from Jerry DeLisle --- Created attachment 33160 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id3160&actioníit Updated patch taking care of valgrind error This patch includes fixing the valgrind error by allocating and setting the NULL byte at the end of the format string.