* [Bug libfortran/61499] [4.9/410 Regression] Internal read of negative integer broken
2014-06-13 14:55 [Bug libfortran/61499] New: Internal read of negative integer broken in 4.9.0 on krefson at gmail dot com
@ 2014-06-13 17:49 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-06-25 11:16 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (10 subsequent siblings)
11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-06-13 17:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61499
Jerry DeLisle <jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed| |2014-06-13
CC| |jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
Summary|Internal read of negative |[4.9/410 Regression]
|integer broken in 4.9.0 on |Internal read of negative
| |integer broken
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Severity|major |normal
--- Comment #1 from Jerry DeLisle <jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Confirmed. Regression
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [Bug libfortran/61499] [4.9/410 Regression] Internal read of negative integer broken
2014-06-13 14:55 [Bug libfortran/61499] New: Internal read of negative integer broken in 4.9.0 on krefson at gmail dot com
2014-06-13 17:49 ` [Bug libfortran/61499] [4.9/410 Regression] Internal read of negative integer broken jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2014-06-25 11:16 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-06-25 20:08 ` [Bug libfortran/61499] [4.9/4.10 " pault at gcc dot gnu.org
` (9 subsequent siblings)
11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-06-25 11:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61499
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [Bug libfortran/61499] [4.9/4.10 Regression] Internal read of negative integer broken
2014-06-13 14:55 [Bug libfortran/61499] New: Internal read of negative integer broken in 4.9.0 on krefson at gmail dot com
2014-06-13 17:49 ` [Bug libfortran/61499] [4.9/410 Regression] Internal read of negative integer broken jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-06-25 11:16 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2014-06-25 20:08 ` pault at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-06-26 12:49 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (8 subsequent siblings)
11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: pault at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-06-25 20:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61499
Paul Thomas <pault at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |burnus at gcc dot gnu.org,
| |pault at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 from Paul Thomas <pault at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Jerry DeLisle from comment #1)
> Confirmed. Regression
Jerry - any progress on this? I am starting, with Tobias a triage of
regressions prior to the release of 4.9.1
Cheers
Paul
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [Bug libfortran/61499] [4.9/4.10 Regression] Internal read of negative integer broken
2014-06-13 14:55 [Bug libfortran/61499] New: Internal read of negative integer broken in 4.9.0 on krefson at gmail dot com
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2014-06-25 20:08 ` [Bug libfortran/61499] [4.9/4.10 " pault at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2014-06-26 12:49 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-06-27 4:24 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
` (7 subsequent siblings)
11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-06-26 12:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61499
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Priority|P3 |P4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [Bug libfortran/61499] [4.9/4.10 Regression] Internal read of negative integer broken
2014-06-13 14:55 [Bug libfortran/61499] New: Internal read of negative integer broken in 4.9.0 on krefson at gmail dot com
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2014-06-26 12:49 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2014-06-27 4:24 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-06-27 4:27 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
` (6 subsequent siblings)
11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-06-27 4:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61499
--- Comment #3 from Jerry DeLisle <jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Fri Jun 27 04:23:36 2014
New Revision: 212059
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=212059&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-06-26 Jerry DeLisle <jvdelisle@gcc.gnu.org>
PR libgfortran/61499
* io/list_read.c (eat_spaces): Use a 'for' loop instead of
'while' loop to skip the loop if there are no bytes left in the
string. Only seek if actual spaces can be skipped.
Modified:
trunk/libgfortran/ChangeLog
trunk/libgfortran/io/list_read.c
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [Bug libfortran/61499] [4.9/4.10 Regression] Internal read of negative integer broken
2014-06-13 14:55 [Bug libfortran/61499] New: Internal read of negative integer broken in 4.9.0 on krefson at gmail dot com
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2014-06-27 4:24 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2014-06-27 4:27 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-06-27 21:12 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-06-27 4:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61499
--- Comment #4 from Jerry DeLisle <jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Fri Jun 27 04:26:51 2014
New Revision: 212060
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=212060&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-06-26 Jerry DeLisle <jvdelisle@gcc.gnu.org>
PR libgfortran/61499
gfortran.dg/arrayio_15.f90: New test.
Added:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/arrayio_15.f90
Modified:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [Bug libfortran/61499] [4.9/4.10 Regression] Internal read of negative integer broken
2014-06-13 14:55 [Bug libfortran/61499] New: Internal read of negative integer broken in 4.9.0 on krefson at gmail dot com
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2014-06-27 4:27 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2014-06-27 21:12 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-06-27 21:35 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-06-27 21:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61499
--- Comment #5 from Jerry DeLisle <jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Fri Jun 27 21:11:20 2014
New Revision: 212089
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=212089&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-06-27 Jerry DeLisle <jvdelisle@gcc.gnu.org>
Backport from trunk.
PR libgfortran/61499
* io/list_read.c (eat_spaces): Use a 'for' loop instead of
'while' loop to skip the loop if there are no bytes left in the
string. Only seek if actual spaces can be skipped.
Modified:
branches/gcc-4_9-branch/libgfortran/ChangeLog
branches/gcc-4_9-branch/libgfortran/io/list_read.c
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [Bug libfortran/61499] [4.9/4.10 Regression] Internal read of negative integer broken
2014-06-13 14:55 [Bug libfortran/61499] New: Internal read of negative integer broken in 4.9.0 on krefson at gmail dot com
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2014-06-27 21:12 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2014-06-27 21:35 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-06-27 21:38 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-06-27 21:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61499
--- Comment #6 from Jerry DeLisle <jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Author: jvdelisle
Revision: 212060
Modified property: svn:log
Modified: svn:log at Fri Jun 27 21:34:33 2014
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--- svn:log (original)
+++ svn:log Fri Jun 27 21:34:33 2014
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
2014-06-26 Jerry DeLisle <jvdelisle@gcc.gnu.org>
PR libgfortran/61499
- gfortran.dg/arrayio_15.f90: New test.
+ * gfortran.dg/arrayio_15.f90: New test.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [Bug libfortran/61499] [4.9/4.10 Regression] Internal read of negative integer broken
2014-06-13 14:55 [Bug libfortran/61499] New: Internal read of negative integer broken in 4.9.0 on krefson at gmail dot com
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2014-06-27 21:35 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2014-06-27 21:38 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-07-03 18:51 ` pault at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-06-27 21:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61499
--- Comment #7 from Jerry DeLisle <jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Fri Jun 27 21:38:06 2014
New Revision: 212090
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=212090&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-06-27 Jerry DeLisle <jvdelisle@gcc.gnu.org>
Backport from mainline.
PR libgfortran/61499
* gfortran.dg/arrayio_15.f90: New test.
Added:
branches/gcc-4_9-branch/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/arrayio_15.f90
Modified:
branches/gcc-4_9-branch/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [Bug libfortran/61499] [4.9/4.10 Regression] Internal read of negative integer broken
2014-06-13 14:55 [Bug libfortran/61499] New: Internal read of negative integer broken in 4.9.0 on krefson at gmail dot com
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2014-06-27 21:38 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2014-07-03 18:51 ` pault at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-07-04 16:24 ` krefson at gmail dot com
2014-07-07 3:39 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: pault at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-07-03 18:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61499
--- Comment #8 from Paul Thomas <pault at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Hi Jerry,
Looks as if you did the business?
Maybe it should be closed.
Thanks
Paul
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [Bug libfortran/61499] [4.9/4.10 Regression] Internal read of negative integer broken
2014-06-13 14:55 [Bug libfortran/61499] New: Internal read of negative integer broken in 4.9.0 on krefson at gmail dot com
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
2014-07-03 18:51 ` pault at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2014-07-04 16:24 ` krefson at gmail dot com
2014-07-07 3:39 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: krefson at gmail dot com @ 2014-07-04 16:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61499
--- Comment #9 from Keith Refson <krefson at gmail dot com> ---
This fix checks out for the full code in context as well as the boiled-down
example. Happy for this to be closed.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [Bug libfortran/61499] [4.9/4.10 Regression] Internal read of negative integer broken
2014-06-13 14:55 [Bug libfortran/61499] New: Internal read of negative integer broken in 4.9.0 on krefson at gmail dot com
` (10 preceding siblings ...)
2014-07-04 16:24 ` krefson at gmail dot com
@ 2014-07-07 3:39 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-07-07 3:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61499
Jerry DeLisle <jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #10 from Jerry DeLisle <jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Fixed and Closing
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread