public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Keith.S.Thompson at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/61502] == comparison on "one-past" pointer gives wrong result
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2014 23:55:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-61502-4-DhTfespJPS@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-61502-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61502

--- Comment #8 from Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson at gmail dot com> ---
I'm not (deliberately) considering anything other than the requirements
of the C standard.

The standard talks about an array object immediately following another
array object in the address space. Since that phrase is used in
normative wording in the standard, I presume it's meaningful.  Since
the term is not otherwise defined, I presume that the intended meaning
is one that follows reasonably clearly from the wording.

The test program for Bug 63611, when I execute it, prints the string
"y immediately follows x", followed by the string "inconsistent behavior:".

Are you saying it's possible that y immediately follows x in the
address space when that line of output is printed, and that y *doesn't*
immediately follow x in the address space when "inconsistent behavior:"
is printed?

If so, can you describe what the word "follows" means in this context?
If it has a meaning that permits such behavior, can you cite a source
that indicates that that's how the authors of the standard meant it?


  parent reply	other threads:[~2014-10-21 23:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-06-13 15:59 [Bug c/61502] New: " Peter.Sewell at cl dot cam.ac.uk
2014-06-13 19:29 ` [Bug c/61502] " joseph at codesourcery dot com
2014-06-13 22:59 ` joseph at codesourcery dot com
2014-06-14  8:00 ` harald at gigawatt dot nl
2014-10-21 21:44 ` [Bug tree-optimization/61502] " jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-10-21 22:32 ` Keith.S.Thompson at gmail dot com
2014-10-21 23:17 ` joseph at codesourcery dot com
2014-10-21 23:55 ` Keith.S.Thompson at gmail dot com [this message]
2014-10-22  1:48 ` joseph at codesourcery dot com
2014-10-22  2:48 ` Keith.S.Thompson at gmail dot com
2014-10-22  8:40 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-10-22 16:55 ` harald at gigawatt dot nl
2014-10-22 17:25 ` joseph at codesourcery dot com
2014-10-26 18:30 ` Keith.S.Thompson at gmail dot com
2014-10-27 18:28 ` joseph at codesourcery dot com
2015-04-07  8:45 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-11-21  4:46 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-11-21  4:49 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-07-01 16:26 ` egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-01-26 13:17 ` vincent-gcc at vinc17 dot net

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-61502-4-DhTfespJPS@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).