public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug target/61533] New: gcc.target/i386/fuse-caller-save.c FAILs on 64-bit Solaris/x86
@ 2014-06-17  9:10 ro at gcc dot gnu.org
  2014-06-17  9:11 ` [Bug target/61533] " ro at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (5 more replies)
  0 siblings, 6 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: ro at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-06-17  9:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61533

            Bug ID: 61533
           Summary: gcc.target/i386/fuse-caller-save.c FAILs on 64-bit
                    Solaris/x86
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.10.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: target
          Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
          Reporter: ro at gcc dot gnu.org
                CC: tom at codesourcery dot com, ubizjak at gmail dot com
              Host: i386-pc-solaris2.1[01]
            Target: i386-pc-solaris2.1[01]
             Build: i386-pc-solaris2.1[01]

The new gcc.target/i386/fuse-caller-save.c test FAILs on Solaris 10 and 11/x86
with gas and -m64:

FAIL: gcc.target/i386/fuse-caller-save.c scan-assembler-not .cfi_def_cfa_offset
FAIL: gcc.target/i386/fuse-caller-save.c scan-assembler-not .cfi_offset

It's compiled like this:

/var/gcc/regression/trunk/11-gcc-gas/build/gcc/xgcc
-B/var/gcc/regression/trunk/11-gcc-gas/build/gcc/
/vol/gcc/src/hg/trunk/local/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/fuse-caller-save.c
-fno-diagnostics-show-caret -fdiagnostics-color=never -mclear-hwcap -O2
-fuse-caller-save -S -m64 -o fuse-caller-save.s

I'm attaching the assembler output.

  Rainer


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/61533] gcc.target/i386/fuse-caller-save.c FAILs on 64-bit Solaris/x86
  2014-06-17  9:10 [Bug target/61533] New: gcc.target/i386/fuse-caller-save.c FAILs on 64-bit Solaris/x86 ro at gcc dot gnu.org
  2014-06-17  9:11 ` [Bug target/61533] " ro at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2014-06-17  9:11 ` ro at gcc dot gnu.org
  2014-06-17 13:49 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: ro at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-06-17  9:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61533

--- Comment #1 from Rainer Orth <ro at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Created attachment 32950
  --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32950&action=edit
assembler output


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/61533] gcc.target/i386/fuse-caller-save.c FAILs on 64-bit Solaris/x86
  2014-06-17  9:10 [Bug target/61533] New: gcc.target/i386/fuse-caller-save.c FAILs on 64-bit Solaris/x86 ro at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2014-06-17  9:11 ` ro at gcc dot gnu.org
  2014-06-17  9:11 ` ro at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (4 subsequent siblings)
  5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: ro at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-06-17  9:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61533

Rainer Orth <ro at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Target Milestone|---                         |4.10.0


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/61533] gcc.target/i386/fuse-caller-save.c FAILs on 64-bit Solaris/x86
  2014-06-17  9:10 [Bug target/61533] New: gcc.target/i386/fuse-caller-save.c FAILs on 64-bit Solaris/x86 ro at gcc dot gnu.org
  2014-06-17  9:11 ` [Bug target/61533] " ro at gcc dot gnu.org
  2014-06-17  9:11 ` ro at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2014-06-17 13:49 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
  2014-06-17 13:54 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE @ 2014-06-17 13:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61533

--- Comment #3 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE <ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE> ---
> --- Comment #2 from Uroš Bizjak <ubizjak at gmail dot com> ---
> (In reply to Rainer Orth from comment #1)
>> Created attachment 32950 [details]
>> assembler output
>
> The test assumes that frame pointer is omitted.

It passes indeed with -fomit-frame-pointer added on both
i386-pc-solaris2.11 and x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu.  I suppose the patch
is ok then?

    Rainer
>From gcc-bugs-return-454397-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Jun 17 13:51:28 2014
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-454397-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 808 invoked by alias); 17 Jun 2014 13:51:28 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 781 invoked by uid 55); 17 Jun 2014 13:51:23 -0000
From: "yufeng at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/61483] [AArch64] builtin va_start incorrectly initializes the field of va_list for incoming unnamed arguments on the stack
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2014 13:51:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.8.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: yufeng at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: yufeng at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.9.1
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-61483-4-va79dTpPUL@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-61483-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-61483-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2014-06/txt/msg01479.txt.bz2
Content-length: 1842

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?ida483

--- Comment #2 from Yufeng Zhang <yufeng at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Author: yufeng
Date: Tue Jun 17 13:50:50 2014
New Revision: 211739

URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev!1739&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/

    PR target/61483
    * config/aarch64/aarch64.c (aarch64_layout_arg): Add new local
    variable 'size'; calculate 'size' right in the front; use
    'size' to compute 'nregs' (when 'allocate_ncrn != 0') and
    pcum->aapcs_stack_words.

gcc/testsuite/

    PR target/61483
    * gcc.target/aarch64/aapcs64/type-def.h (struct hfa_fx2_t): New type.
    * gcc.target/aarch64/aapcs64/va_arg-13.c: New test.
    * gcc.target/aarch64/aapcs64/va_arg-14.c: Ditto.
    * gcc.target/aarch64/aapcs64/va_arg-15.c: Ditto.

Added:

branches/gcc-4_9-branch/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/aapcs64/va_arg-13.c
      - copied unchanged from r211733,
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/aapcs64/va_arg-13.c

branches/gcc-4_9-branch/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/aapcs64/va_arg-14.c
      - copied unchanged from r211733,
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/aapcs64/va_arg-14.c

branches/gcc-4_9-branch/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/aapcs64/va_arg-15.c
      - copied unchanged from r211733,
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/aapcs64/va_arg-15.c
Modified:
    branches/gcc-4_9-branch/   (props changed)
    branches/gcc-4_9-branch/gcc/ChangeLog
    branches/gcc-4_9-branch/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.c
    branches/gcc-4_9-branch/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
    branches/gcc-4_9-branch/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/aapcs64/type-def.h
    branches/gcc-4_9-branch/libjava/classpath/   (props changed)

Propchange: branches/gcc-4_9-branch/
            ('svn:mergeinfo' modified)

Propchange: branches/gcc-4_9-branch/libjava/classpath/
            ('svn:mergeinfo' modified)


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/61533] gcc.target/i386/fuse-caller-save.c FAILs on 64-bit Solaris/x86
  2014-06-17  9:10 [Bug target/61533] New: gcc.target/i386/fuse-caller-save.c FAILs on 64-bit Solaris/x86 ro at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2014-06-17 13:49 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
@ 2014-06-17 13:54 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com
  2014-06-17 13:58 ` ro at gcc dot gnu.org
  2014-06-17 14:04 ` ro at gcc dot gnu.org
  5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: ubizjak at gmail dot com @ 2014-06-17 13:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61533

--- Comment #4 from Uroš Bizjak <ubizjak at gmail dot com> ---
(In reply to ro@CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE from comment #3)

> > The test assumes that frame pointer is omitted.
> 
> It passes indeed with -fomit-frame-pointer added on both
> i386-pc-solaris2.11 and x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu.  I suppose the patch
> is ok then?

Yes, I think that -fomit-frame-pointer should be added unconditionally to the
dg-options.

Patch is preapproved for mainline SVN.
>From gcc-bugs-return-454399-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Jun 17 13:55:04 2014
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-454399-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 6378 invoked by alias); 17 Jun 2014 13:55:04 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 5124 invoked by uid 48); 17 Jun 2014 13:54:32 -0000
From: "alexander.adam at informatik dot tu-chemnitz.de" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/61537] New: template parameter lists wrongly detected on "struct" or "class" keyword on parameters
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2014 13:55:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: new
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.9.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: alexander.adam at informatik dot tu-chemnitz.de
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter attachments.created
Message-ID: <bug-61537-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2014-06/txt/msg01481.txt.bz2
Content-length: 2985

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61537

            Bug ID: 61537
           Summary: template parameter lists wrongly detected on "struct"
                    or "class" keyword on parameters
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.9.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: c++
          Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
          Reporter: alexander.adam at informatik dot tu-chemnitz.de

Created attachment 32956
  --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32956&action=edit
sample code

When I define a template method outside of its template class declaration, it
cannot use the class or struct keyword on normal parameters.
This worked up to gcc 4.8. If I remove the struct or class keyword, everything
works fine again. I tried -std=c++98 without success.
If I write the definition inside the class Base { ... }; it also works.

When I try to compile the code (see attachment), I get the following error:

$ g++ main.cc
main.cc:17:38: error: too many template-parameter-lists
 void Base<T>::do_sth(S param, struct Dummy) // not working
                                      ^
main.cc:17:6: error: prototype for ‘void Base<T>::do_sth(S, int)’ does not
match any in class ‘Base<T>’
 void Base<T>::do_sth(S param, struct Dummy) // not working
      ^
main.cc:11:18: error: candidate is: template<class T> template<class S> void
Base<T>::do_sth(S, Dummy)
             void do_sth(S param, struct Dummy dummy);

$ gcc -v
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=gcc
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.9/lto-wrapper
Target: x86_64-linux-gnu
Configured with: ../src/configure -v --with-pkgversion='Debian 4.9.0-6'
--with-bugurl=file:///usr/share/doc/gcc-4.9/README.Bugs
--enable-languages=c,c++,java,go,d,fortran,objc,obj-c++ --prefix=/usr
--program-suffix=-4.9 --enable-shared --enable-linker-build-id
--libexecdir=/usr/lib --without-included-gettext --enable-threads=posix
--with-gxx-include-dir=/usr/include/c++/4.9 --libdir=/usr/lib --enable-nls
--with-sysroot=/ --enable-clocale=gnu --enable-libstdcxx-debug
--enable-libstdcxx-time=yes --enable-gnu-unique-object --disable-libmudflap
--enable-plugin --with-system-zlib --disable-browser-plugin
--enable-java-awt=gtk --enable-gtk-cairo
--with-java-home=/usr/lib/jvm/java-1.5.0-gcj-4.9-amd64/jre --enable-java-home
--with-jvm-root-dir=/usr/lib/jvm/java-1.5.0-gcj-4.9-amd64
--with-jvm-jar-dir=/usr/lib/jvm-exports/java-1.5.0-gcj-4.9-amd64
--with-arch-directory=amd64 --with-ecj-jar=/usr/share/java/eclipse-ecj.jar
--enable-objc-gc --enable-multiarch --with-arch-32=i586 --with-abi=m64
--with-multilib-list=m32,m64,mx32 --enable-multilib --with-tune=generic
--enable-checking=release --build=x86_64-linux-gnu --host=x86_64-linux-gnu
--target=x86_64-linux-gnu
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.9.0 (Debian 4.9.0-6)
>From gcc-bugs-return-454400-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Jun 17 13:55:13 2014
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-454400-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 7128 invoked by alias); 17 Jun 2014 13:55:12 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 6757 invoked by uid 48); 17 Jun 2014 13:55:08 -0000
From: "paolo.carlini at oracle dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug libstdc++/61536] [4.10 regression] g++ and libstdc++ regressions on arm-none-linux-gnueabihf with missing typeinfo
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2014 13:55:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: libstdc++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.10.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: link-failure
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.10.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-61536-4-QZ12quWHxz@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-61536-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-61536-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2014-06/txt/msg01482.txt.bz2
Content-length: 418

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?ida536

--- Comment #9 from Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> ---
Well, up to you really: maybe operator!= is special for you because it just
thinly wraps operator== which is exported for you. If adding back *only* that
additional export under the macro works, all your tests are fine, it would be
great. Otherwise, just revert. Sorry again for the breakage.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/61533] gcc.target/i386/fuse-caller-save.c FAILs on 64-bit Solaris/x86
  2014-06-17  9:10 [Bug target/61533] New: gcc.target/i386/fuse-caller-save.c FAILs on 64-bit Solaris/x86 ro at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2014-06-17 13:54 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com
@ 2014-06-17 13:58 ` ro at gcc dot gnu.org
  2014-06-17 14:04 ` ro at gcc dot gnu.org
  5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: ro at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-06-17 13:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61533

--- Comment #5 from Rainer Orth <ro at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Author: ro
Date: Tue Jun 17 13:58:11 2014
New Revision: 211740

URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=211740&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Compile gcc.target/i386/fuse-caller-save.c with -fomit-frame-pointer (PR
target/61533)

    PR target/61533
    * gcc.target/i386/fuse-caller-save.c: Add -fomit-frame-pointer to
    dg-options.

Modified:
    trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
    trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/fuse-caller-save.c


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/61533] gcc.target/i386/fuse-caller-save.c FAILs on 64-bit Solaris/x86
  2014-06-17  9:10 [Bug target/61533] New: gcc.target/i386/fuse-caller-save.c FAILs on 64-bit Solaris/x86 ro at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (4 preceding siblings ...)
  2014-06-17 13:58 ` ro at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2014-06-17 14:04 ` ro at gcc dot gnu.org
  5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: ro at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-06-17 14:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61533

Rainer Orth <ro at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |RESOLVED
                URL|                            |https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-
                   |                            |patches/2014-06/msg01357.ht
                   |                            |ml
         Resolution|---                         |FIXED
           Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org      |ro at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #6 from Rainer Orth <ro at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Fixed for 4.10.0.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2014-06-17 14:04 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2014-06-17  9:10 [Bug target/61533] New: gcc.target/i386/fuse-caller-save.c FAILs on 64-bit Solaris/x86 ro at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-06-17  9:11 ` [Bug target/61533] " ro at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-06-17  9:11 ` ro at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-06-17 13:49 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
2014-06-17 13:54 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com
2014-06-17 13:58 ` ro at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-06-17 14:04 ` ro at gcc dot gnu.org

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).