public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "trippels at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/61539] [4.8/4.9/4.10 Regression] ICE: in unify_one_argument, at cp/pt.c:15465 Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2014 19:48:00 -0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <bug-61539-4-e0bx6fbH5T@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw) In-Reply-To: <bug-61539-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> [-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --] [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8", Size: 10395 bytes --] https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61539 Markus Trippelsdorf <trippels at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed| |2014-06-17 CC| |trippels at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone|--- |4.8.5 Summary|ICE: in unify_one_argument, |[4.8/4.9/4.10 Regression] |at cp/pt.c:15465 |ICE: in unify_one_argument, |validate(value_store, |at cp/pt.c:15465 |new_tokens, (T*)0, 0); | Ever confirmed|0 |1 Known to fail| |4.10.0, 4.8.3, 4.9.0 --- Comment #1 from Markus Trippelsdorf <trippels at gcc dot gnu.org> --- Confirmed. markus@x4 tmp % cat test.ii template <typename _CharT> class A; template <typename> class B; template <class charT> class C; template <> class C<char> { virtual void xparse (int &, const B<A<char> > &) const; }; template <class T, class charT = char> class G : C<charT> { public: G (void *) {} void default_value (const T &); void xparse (int &, const B<A<charT> > &) const; }; template <class T, class charT> void validate (int &, const B<A<charT> > &, T *, int); template <class T, class charT> void G<T, charT>::xparse (int &p1, const B<A<charT> > &p2) const { validate (p1, p2, (T *)0, 0); } template <class T> G<T> *value (T *) { G<T> *r = new G<T>(0); } namespace Eigen { template <typename T> struct D; template <typename, int, int, int = 0 ?: 0, int = 0, int = 0 > class F; template <typename _Scalar, int _Rows, int _Cols, int _Options, int _MaxRows, int _MaxCols> struct D<F<_Scalar, _Rows, _Cols, _Options, _MaxRows, _MaxCols> > { typedef _Scalar Scalar; }; template <typename, int, int, int, int, int _MaxCols> class F { public: typedef typename Eigen::D<F>::Scalar Scalar; F (const Scalar &, const Scalar &, const Scalar &); }; template <class... T> void validate (int &, const B<A<char> > &, Eigen::F<T...> *); } int main (int, char *[]) { Eigen::F<double, 3, 1> a (0, 0, 0); value (&a)->default_value (Eigen::F<double, 3, 1>(0, 0, 0)); } markus@x4 tmp % clang++ -w -c -std=c++11 test.ii markus@x4 tmp % g++ -c -std=c++11 test.ii test.ii: In substitution of âtemplate<class ... T> void Eigen::validate(int&, const B<A<char> >&, Eigen::F<T ...>*) [with T = <missing>]â: test.ii:20:30: required from âvoid G<T, charT>::xparse(int&, const B<A<charT> >&) const [with T = Eigen::F<double, 3, 1>; charT = char]â test.ii:46:1: required from here test.ii:20:30: internal compiler error: in unify_one_argument, at cp/pt.c:16504 validate (p1, p2, (T *)0, 0); ^ 0x5e66fc unify_one_argument ../../gcc/gcc/cp/pt.c:16503 0x5e7562 unify_pack_expansion ../../gcc/gcc/cp/pt.c:17322 0x5e5b6b unify ../../gcc/gcc/cp/pt.c:18077 0x4fccc7 try_class_unification ../../gcc/gcc/cp/pt.c:17084 0x5e2bff unify ../../gcc/gcc/cp/pt.c:18105 0x5e2dec unify ../../gcc/gcc/cp/pt.c:17973 0x5e64f7 unify_one_argument ../../gcc/gcc/cp/pt.c:16509 0x5e894c type_unification_real ../../gcc/gcc/cp/pt.c:16581 0x5f2973 fn_type_unification(tree_node*, tree_node*, tree_node*, tree_node* const*, unsigned int, tree_node*, unification_kind_t, int, bool, bool) ../../gcc/gcc/cp/pt.c:16019 0x55e9d1 add_template_candidate_real ../../gcc/gcc/cp/call.c:3008 0x55f4ac add_template_candidate ../../gcc/gcc/cp/call.c:3105 0x55f4ac add_candidates ../../gcc/gcc/cp/call.c:5233 0x561cf9 perform_overload_resolution ../../gcc/gcc/cp/call.c:3953 0x56430a build_new_function_call(tree_node*, vec<tree_node*, va_gc, vl_embed>**, bool, int) ../../gcc/gcc/cp/call.c:4030 0x6e1d74 finish_call_expr(tree_node*, vec<tree_node*, va_gc, vl_embed>**, bool, bool, int) ../../gcc/gcc/cp/semantics.c:2365 0x5b7446 tsubst_copy_and_build(tree_node*, tree_node*, int, tree_node*, bool, bool) ../../gcc/gcc/cp/pt.c:14958 0x5c7a4e tsubst_expr ../../gcc/gcc/cp/pt.c:14137 0x5c8455 tsubst_expr ../../gcc/gcc/cp/pt.c:13563 0x5c8a37 tsubst_expr ../../gcc/gcc/cp/pt.c:13735 0x5c55ae instantiate_decl(tree_node*, int, bool) ../../gcc/gcc/cp/pt.c:20047 Please submit a full bug report, >From gcc-bugs-return-454422-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Jun 17 19:52:19 2014 Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-454422-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org> Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 3051 invoked by alias); 17 Jun 2014 19:52:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org> List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/> List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org> Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 3026 invoked by uid 48); 17 Jun 2014 19:52:15 -0000 From: "trippels at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/61539] [4.8/4.9/4.10 Regression] ICE: in unify_one_argument, at cp/pt.c:15465 Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2014 19:52:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.8.2 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: trippels at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.8.5 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: <bug-61539-4-Ec8QOooSFE@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-61539-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-61539-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2014-06/txt/msg01504.txt.bz2 Content-length: 1197 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61539 --- Comment #2 from Markus Trippelsdorf <trippels at gcc dot gnu.org> --- Another smaller testcase (clang rejects this): markus@x4 tmp % cat foo.ii template <class> class A; template <> class A<char> { virtual void m_fn1 (int &, const int &) const; }; template <typename, int> class B; template <class, class = int> class C : A<char> { public: C (void *) {} void m_fn1 (int &, const int &) const; }; C<B<double, 0> > *a = new C<B<double, 0>>(0); template <class... T> void validate (B<T...> *); template <class T, class charT> void C<T, charT>::m_fn1 (int &, const int &) const { validate ((T *)0); } markus@x4 tmp % g++ -c -std=c++11 foo.ii foo.ii: In substitution of âtemplate<class ... T> void validate(B<T ...>*) [with T = <missing>]â: foo.ii:18:19: required from âvoid C< <template-parameter-1-1>, <template-parameter-1-2> >::m_fn1(int&, const int&) const [with <template-parameter-1-1> = B<double, 0>; <template-parameter-1-2> = int]â foo.ii:19:1: required from here foo.ii:18:19: internal compiler error: in unify_one_argument, at cp/pt.c:16504 PR60942 looks like a dup. >From gcc-bugs-return-454423-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Jun 17 19:52:37 2014 Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-454423-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org> Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 4349 invoked by alias); 17 Jun 2014 19:52:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org> List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/> List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org> Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 3691 invoked by uid 48); 17 Jun 2014 19:52:30 -0000 From: "rose.garcia-eggl2fk at yopmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug bootstrap/61388] [4.8 Regression] linux/microblaze fails to build: undefined machine-specific constraint at this point: "Q" Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2014 19:52:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: bootstrap X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.8.3 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: rose.garcia-eggl2fk at yopmail dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.8.4 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: <bug-61388-4-V5kt8QVfN9@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-61388-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-61388-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2014-06/txt/msg01505.txt.bz2 Content-length: 899 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?ida388 --- Comment #5 from Rose Garcia <rose.garcia-eggl2fk at yopmail dot com> --- (In reply to Michael Eager from comment #3) > What sources are you building? GCC 4.8.3 release tarball, as already mentioned. > > When I build --target=microblaze-xilinx-elf from the current sources, I see > the same warning message for microblaze.md that you list. I do not see the > other errors. Constraint "Q" is defined in constraints.md. others building gcc 4.8.3 reported the same problem. the problem is that this patch entered the *stable* release series between 4.8.2 and 4.8.3, and apparently depends on changes from the 4.9.x devel branch. this patch reportedly fixes the problem: http://www.openadk.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?p=openadk.git;a=blob;f=toolchain/gcc/patches/4.8.3/miscompile.microblaze;hÕ75054aa9a6b9c6081753289dcfc4b3e47c5af7;hb=HEAD
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-06-17 19:48 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2014-06-17 17:36 [Bug c++/61539] New: ICE: in unify_one_argument, at cp/pt.c:15465 validate(value_store, new_tokens, (T*)0, 0); ilja.j.honkonen at nasa dot gov 2014-06-17 19:48 ` trippels at gcc dot gnu.org [this message] 2014-06-17 20:46 ` [Bug c++/61539] [4.8/4.9/4.10 Regression] ICE: in unify_one_argument, at cp/pt.c:15465 trippels at gcc dot gnu.org 2014-06-18 13:30 ` trippels at gcc dot gnu.org 2014-06-26 12:51 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2014-06-30 15:12 ` jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2014-06-30 15:59 ` jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2014-06-30 16:11 ` jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2014-06-30 17:31 ` jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2014-06-30 17:36 ` jason at gcc dot gnu.org
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=bug-61539-4-e0bx6fbH5T@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).