public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug tree-optimization/61560] New: FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-fre-32.c on arm
@ 2014-06-19 11:10 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
  2014-06-19 11:12 ` [Bug tree-optimization/61560] " ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (3 more replies)
  0 siblings, 4 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-06-19 11:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61560

            Bug ID: 61560
           Summary: FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-fre-32.c on arm
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.10.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: tree-optimization
          Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
          Reporter: ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org

Created attachment 32972
  --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32972&action=edit
fre pass diff between bad and good dumps

On arm-none-eabi I see a regression in the aforementioned test:
FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-fre-32.c scan-tree-dump-times fre1 "return
x_\\d+\\(D\\);" 2

Curiously this doesn't happen for an aarch64-none-elf target built from the
same revision (r211782)

I'm attaching the diff between the failing (bad) fre dump for arm and the
passing (good) dump from aarch64


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* [Bug tree-optimization/61560] FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-fre-32.c on arm
  2014-06-19 11:10 [Bug tree-optimization/61560] New: FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-fre-32.c on arm ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2014-06-19 11:12 ` ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
  2014-06-23 10:53 ` [Bug testsuite/61560] [4.10 Regression] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-06-19 11:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61560

ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Keywords|                            |missed-optimization
             Target|                            |arm-none-eabi
                 CC|                            |rguenther at suse dot de
      Known to work|                            |4.9.0
      Known to fail|                            |4.10.0

--- Comment #1 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
cc'ing richi as he touched that test and area last.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* [Bug testsuite/61560] [4.10 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-fre-32.c on arm
  2014-06-19 11:10 [Bug tree-optimization/61560] New: FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-fre-32.c on arm ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
  2014-06-19 11:12 ` [Bug tree-optimization/61560] " ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2014-06-23 10:53 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
  2014-06-25  8:37 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
  2014-06-25  8:38 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-06-23 10:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61560

Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |ASSIGNED
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2014-06-23
          Component|tree-optimization           |testsuite
   Target Milestone|---                         |4.10.0
            Summary|FAIL:                       |[4.10 Regression] FAIL:
                   |gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-fre-32. |gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-fre-32.
                   |c on arm                    |c on arm
     Ever confirmed|0                           |1

--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
It's a testsuite issue, arm returns _Complex float in memory it seems so
we can't propagate a register into the return stmt.

I'll think of a good solution.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* [Bug testsuite/61560] [4.10 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-fre-32.c on arm
  2014-06-19 11:10 [Bug tree-optimization/61560] New: FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-fre-32.c on arm ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
  2014-06-19 11:12 ` [Bug tree-optimization/61560] " ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
  2014-06-23 10:53 ` [Bug testsuite/61560] [4.10 Regression] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2014-06-25  8:37 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
  2014-06-25  8:38 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-06-25  8:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61560

Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |RESOLVED
         Resolution|---                         |FIXED

--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Fixed.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* [Bug testsuite/61560] [4.10 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-fre-32.c on arm
  2014-06-19 11:10 [Bug tree-optimization/61560] New: FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-fre-32.c on arm ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2014-06-25  8:37 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2014-06-25  8:38 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-06-25  8:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61560

--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Jun 25 08:37:37 2014
New Revision: 211970

URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=211970&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-06-25  Richard Biener  <rguenther@suse.de>

    PR testsuite/61560
    * gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-fre-32.c: Change to avoid differences
    for targets that return _Complex float in memory.

Modified:
    trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
    trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-fre-32.c


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2014-06-25  8:38 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2014-06-19 11:10 [Bug tree-optimization/61560] New: FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-fre-32.c on arm ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-06-19 11:12 ` [Bug tree-optimization/61560] " ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-06-23 10:53 ` [Bug testsuite/61560] [4.10 Regression] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-06-25  8:37 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-06-25  8:38 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).