From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-454568-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 27061 invoked by alias); 19 Jun 2014 22:11:28 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 27020 invoked by uid 48); 19 Jun 2014 22:11:24 -0000
From: "vries at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug testsuite/61567] New: gfortran.dg/coarray_collectives_{5,6}.f90 failure
Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2014 22:11:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: new
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: testsuite
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.10.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: minor
X-Bugzilla-Who: vries at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter attachments.created
Message-ID: <bug-61567-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2014-06/txt/msg01650.txt.bz2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61567

            Bug ID: 61567
           Summary: gfortran.dg/coarray_collectives_{5,6}.f90 failure
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.10.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: minor
          Priority: P3
         Component: testsuite
          Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
          Reporter: vries at gcc dot gnu.org

Created attachment 32978
  --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32978&action=edit
coarray_collectives_5.f90

I see these failures with r211823.

./gcc/testsuite/gfortran/gfortran.sum:
...
FAIL: gfortran.dg/coarray_collectives_5.f90  -O   scan-tree-dump-times original
"_gfortran_caf_co_max \\(&desc.., 0B, 0, &stat1, 0B, 0, 0\\);" 1
FAIL: gfortran.dg/coarray_collectives_5.f90  -O   scan-tree-dump-times original
"_gfortran_caf_co_min \\(&desc.., 0B, 0, &stat2, 0B, 0, 0\\);" 1
FAIL: gfortran.dg/coarray_collectives_5.f90  -O   scan-tree-dump-times original
"_gfortran_caf_co_sum \\(&desc.., 0B, 0, &stat3, 0B, 0\\);" 1
FAIL: gfortran.dg/coarray_collectives_6.f90  -O   scan-tree-dump-times original
"_gfortran_caf_co_max \\(&desc.., 0B, 0, &stat1, errmesg1, 0, 6\\);" 1
FAIL: gfortran.dg/coarray_collectives_6.f90  -O   scan-tree-dump-times original
"_gfortran_caf_co_sum \\(&val2, 0B, 4, &stat2, errmesg2, 7\\);" 1
FAIL: gfortran.dg/coarray_collectives_6.f90  -O   scan-tree-dump-times original
"_gfortran_caf_co_min \\(&desc.., 0B, res, &stat3, errmesg3, 99, 8\\);" 1
...

The original dump for coarray_collectives_5.f90 contains:
  _gfortran_caf_co_max (&desc.0, 0, &stat1, 0B, 0, 0);
and the scan for this pattern fails:
  _gfortran_caf_co_max \\(&desc.., 0B, 0, &stat1, 0B, 0, 0\\);

I tentatively marked this as a testsuite problem.