From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id D6B393840032; Wed, 21 Jul 2021 05:13:24 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org D6B393840032
From: "me at larbob dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug middle-end/61577] [4.9.0 Regression] can't compile on hp-ux v3
 ia64
Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2021 05:13:24 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.9.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: build
X-Bugzilla-Severity: major
X-Bugzilla-Who: me at larbob dot org
X-Bugzilla-Status: WAITING
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-61577-4-GGkIQGyywR@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-61577-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-61577-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2021 05:13:24 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D61577

--- Comment #269 from Larkin Nickle <me at larbob dot org> ---
(In reply to The Written Word from comment #268)
> (In reply to Larkin Nickle from comment #262)
> > Created attachment 51182 [details]
> > GCC 11.1 patch to net dwarf2 debugging symbols
> >=20
> > Rebuilding with this patch. Should hopefully net me actual dwarf2 debug
> > symbols.
>=20
> What if you use the GCC --gdwarf-2 option instead of this patch? Does the
> patch just set the default DWARF version? Seems like if GCC supports DWARF
> >2, --gdwarf-2 should generate just v2 DWARF info.

Yes, I think that should work fine too.=