From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-497826-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 3039 invoked by alias); 22 Sep 2015 17:41:15 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 2933 invoked by uid 48); 22 Sep 2015 17:41:12 -0000
From: "vogt at linux dot vnet.ibm.com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/61578] [4.9 regression] Code size increase for ARM thumb compared to 4.8.x when compiling with -Os
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2015 17:41:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.9.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: vogt at linux dot vnet.ibm.com
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.9.4
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: attachments.created
Message-ID: <bug-61578-4-yPGAhCq0f3@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-61578-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-61578-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-09/txt/msg01804.txt.bz2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61578

--- Comment #28 from Dominik Vogt <vogt at linux dot vnet.ibm.com> ---
Created attachment 36371
  --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36371&action=edit
Outpout of the reload pass (BAD)

The full output of the reload pass on S/390, showing the behaviour described in
comment 27.