From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-456188-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 7058 invoked by alias); 12 Jul 2014 22:19:10 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 6992 invoked by uid 48); 12 Jul 2014 22:19:07 -0000
From: "dominiq at lps dot ens.fr" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/61615] Failure to resolve correct generic with TYPE(C_PTR) arguments
Date: Sat, 12 Jul 2014 22:19:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.10.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
X-Bugzilla-Status: WAITING
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status cf_reconfirmed_on everconfirmed
Message-ID: <bug-61615-4-Xoj39pSqAf@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-61615-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-61615-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2014-07/txt/msg00779.txt.bz2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61615

Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |WAITING
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2014-07-12
     Ever confirmed|0                           |1

--- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> ---
If I use Fortran pointers as below, I get the "expected" output

MODULE foo
  USE iso_c_binding
  IMPLICIT NONE
  INTERFACE bar
    MODULE PROCEDURE bar_s
    MODULE PROCEDURE bar_a1d
  END INTERFACE bar
CONTAINS
  SUBROUTINE bar_s(a, b)
    real, pointer :: a, b
    WRITE (0, *) 'in bar_s'
  END SUBROUTINE bar_s

  SUBROUTINE bar_a1d(a, b)
    real, pointer :: a(:), b(:)
    WRITE (0, *) 'in bar_a1d'
  END SUBROUTINE bar_a1d
END MODULE foo

PROGRAM cptr_array_vs_scalar_arg
  USE foo
  USE iso_c_binding
  IMPLICIT NONE
  INTEGER, TARGET :: i
  real, pointer :: a, b
  real, pointer :: c(:), d(:)
  CALL bar(a, b)
  CALL bar(c, d)
END PROGRAM cptr_array_vs_scalar_arg

I don't understand how the code in comment 0 can distinguish bar_s from bar_a1d
based on the variable locations in memory, nor why it chooses bar_a1d.